Virtualization Pro

Sep 12 2008   7:28PM GMT

What’s that noise? Predictions for VMworld 2008

Rich Brambley Rich Brambley Profile: Rich Brambley

By Monday morning, the buzz surrounding the world’s largest virtualization conference, VMworld 2008 in Las Vegas, Nevada, should be so deafening that it will make you virtually insane. The pun was intended. The topics on news, finance, technical analysis and blog sites will be overflowing with announcements and reports from VMware, sponsors, exhibitors and partners at the conference. We are, and will continue, contributing to the buzz here at Virtualization Pro as well. There will also be strategically released announcements from VMware’s competitors, most of which signed up for exhibitor booths at VMworld anyway. I do not know how I will keep up with the steady geyser of information, and I will be in the middle of it.

Here are some of my predictions on what I expect (more like hope) to hear loud and clear above the constant static to be generated next week. I have no special access or insight other than my conversations with my contacts. These predictions are just my guesses.


  • Continuous Availability – Demonstrated in the past at VMworlds, the ability to simultaneously run a VM across multiple ESX/ESXi hosts and provide a synchronized, instantaneous failover will be touted as the foundation for the next generation of VMware’s HA (high availability) features.
  • Cloud Infrastructure – Building on advances like continuous availability, VMware’s vision of ubiquitous and automated virtual infrastructure will be discussed in detail.

VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure)

  • Offline VMs – The latest version of VMware’s virtual desktop manager product, VDM, will help push the VDI concept to the next level of adoption with the ability to provide mobile users a local copy of a VM that will synchronize with a master version when on the corporate network.
  • Faster, more flexible and efficient VM deployments – I expect to hear about advancements in the ability to rapidly deploy large numbers of VMs from a single master template using minimal storage space. This will be achieved by separating the operating system, applications, and user profiles into separate components that are individually pieced together to form a customized virtual desktop. Enhancements from storage vendors in thin provisioning and LUN cloning will support this model.

VMware Workstation 6.5

  • Version 6.5 – VMworld 2008 would be a great time to release the latest version, wouldn’t it? With the growing popularity of Sun’s xVM Virtualbox VMware should take the opportunity to introduce the new version and all the automation, GUI, and performance improvements they’ve added.
  • Integration of ACE – Building on the existing integration of VMware ACE in the current version, I expect VMware Workstation and ACE to merge into one product eventually.
  • Free Version or enhancements to VMware Player – I’m not convinced that the full version of Workstation will ever be offered for free, but, just like VMware’s strategy with ESXi, I can imagine a free version of VMware Workstation that could be offered with limited features. Whether VMware introduces a restricted Workstation or just adds to the already free VMware Player, offering a free desktop product with comparable features to the competition would make sense.

3  Comments on this Post

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • Rick Vanover
    I am hoping samplings and nibbles of "VI4" will be available. I think that is the next milestone, and am excited with what will be teased next week. Some dreamy ideas on my late night wish list: -grid virtualization (distributed resources across hosts for a VM) -co-hosting of a VM (like marathon) -new pricing model -VMFS4 enhancement - maybe a virtual LUN accessible across types (NFS and FC) -VM recycle bin
    20 pointsBadges:
  • Rich Brambley
    Rick, I've heard rumors about your first three wishes. Your last two are unique concepts to me. For a LUN to span storage protocols it would require ESX to either support NTFS on FC or VMFS on NFS - interesting possibilities. A VM Recycle Bin would be convenient, but not sure if the extra storage space would be worth it?!
    0 pointsBadges:
  • Rick Vanover
    The VM recycle bin is a tough call at first - but when I ddi the accidental delete of a test VM - I would have really liked the concept! I think that is a good use of local storage IMHO (I don't do anything locally for the hosts).
    20 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: