four years ago I was in Mountain View, California, interviewing for a position with Google.
It was an odd sort of interview. Lots of puzzles, math-like challenges, and code. Lots, and lots, and lots of code.
No, what struck me were the people. Continued »
The income stream will help in two ways: If you lose the job, it will help meet your needs, but while you keep the job, it will help you build the fund.
Today, two things: How to build the fund, and how to generate an income stream.
When I introduced the Eff U Fund, I suggested that the very idea was challenged. Once you’ve saved up the three-to-six months of savings, should you tell the boss to, well, Forget himself and walk out, that money will run out very quickly. I suggested the reader needs a revenue stream, not a pile of cash.
I’m not the first person to have this idea; why, George Costanza realizes it in an early episode of Seinfeld.
Have you ever seen or heard a conversation something like this:
Person: My job stinks. My boss is a jerk. My goals don’t make sense, and just as I’m about to have a handle on them, they change. I report to six different people.
Comment #1: Man, that stinks.
Person: I’m worried about my job. I might lose it. I wish I could just quit, but I need to pay the mortgage.
Comment #2: What you need is an F U fund!
Ahh, yes. The F U fund, which may stand for “Forget You.” Three to six months of savings, so if things get really tough, you can bail out. I understand.
The problem is, it isn’t enough. Oh Yes! The internet commenters say, you /really/ need six to nine months.
That isn’t enough either.
In fact, it’s unlikely that your F U fund will ever be large enough to solve this kind of problem – but there are other ways – which are demonstrated on, of all things, an episode of The Office.
Yes, that’s right, Michael Scott, the bumbling manager of The Office, figured this when he tried to sell the Michael Scott Paper Company …
But first …
Professional Conferences give you new ideas to try, to grow your network, and can provide a chance to reflect and charge. I can’t recommend them enough.
Yet when I mention how wonderful conferences are, one of the common responses I get is “that’s great Matt but …”
Folks don’t get to attend them because it isn’t in the budget, isn’t in the travel budget, or just plain isn’t on the radar.
If you are in that boat, well, this blog post is for you.
I’m going to tell you how to get to a professional conference in the next eighteen months.
You do the work, I can get you to a conference.
I’ll stake my reputation on it.
Last time, my friend Shawn introduced his premise — that IT Workers are the coal miners of the 21st Century.
This time, Shawn’s back, to explain how the shift from hourly work to exempt has changed the nature of the work itself … and not for the better.
Obviously, Shawn’s comments are an analogy. Certainly, working conditions and employment opportunities looked much more dim for the West Virginia coal miner of 1897. Where the coal miner risked a collapsed mine, lack of oxygen, and poisoned lungs, an IT worker might face a paper cut, or, perhaps, repetitive stress injury from too much typing.
Still, there are things going on in how IT workers are treated; his ideas may cause you to pause and refect.
Back to you, Shawn …
A few weeks back, I introduced you to my friend Shawn. He’s a strong systems thinker, a former soldier, someone I respect and admired from my youth.
Shawn cut his teeth in the dotCom era, becoming a programmer, then general technologist, then IT manager, now … I’m not sure. Last time I checked, he was an account rep for an IT managed services firm, the kind that has been eating a hole in traditional IT departments.
Shawn cares about his field, and his perspective is shared by life in the trenches. So when he kept writing about what he sees happening to our field, and asked me to publish it, I couldn’t say no.
Here’s the question that keeps Shawn up at night: Are IT Workers the Coal Miners of the 21st Century?
From here on out the words belong to Shawn, not me.
Men and women of greater writing talent and skill than I have written eulogies for Steve Jobs. Some have been touching and inspirational; others knew him, or his companies, far better than I. It would be more than a little pretentious for me to try to write an article that, at best, might be a bit of a copy of what has come before.
And that’s good, because that ain’t this article.
Instead of talking about what Mr. Jobs did, I’d like to talk about what made him different, and how, in our own way, we can be different too.
The Heart of the Matter is that Steve Jobs was a thief and a failure.
He was good at it.
You should be too.
So two weeks ago, HP made it’s announcement that it was considering leaving the PC business, and I made my speculation that Dell might fill in the gap.
Then I went home for the weekend and found this headline on the cover of EWeek:
“The World According to Dell: The Company Michael Dell started in 1984 has expanded into areas Dell Executives didn’t even consider give years ago: Software, Services, and Cloud Computing.”
It’s almost as if the folks at Dell strategically timed a marketing push, just at a time when the traditional competition was at it’s weakest.
nah. That would actually make … sense.
The article is fascinating, and a good read; here are a few of my favorite gems: