The Virtualization Room

Dec 4 2007   10:06AM GMT

Sun thinks big with xVM Ops Center

Alex Barrett Alex Barrett Profile: Alex Barrett

Just as it said it would back in October, Sun Microsystems Inc. is releasing version 1.0 of its “new” xVM Ops Center management suite, which is really a merger of its Sun N1 System Manager (N1SM) and Sun Connection configuration management software packages that have been brought under the auspices of Sun’s nascent virtualization brand.

Nevertheless, xVM Ops Center Director of Marketing Oren Teich claims there’s more to Sun’s new management bundle than branding. There’s a nice new Web user interface, of course; but perhaps more to the point, xVM Ops Center can manage a far greater number of operating system instances than its prior incarnation. To wit: N1SM maxed out in the 100- to 250-node range; Sun Connection gave up around 500; but Teich claims xVM Ops Center is able to manage around 5,000 running OS instances.

“That’s a lot bigger than any of our customers have calls for using,” Teich said. That includes the Texas Advanced Computing Center, whose 3,936-node Sun-based supercomputer will be managed by xVM Ops Center.

That surge in scalability stems from a redesign of xVM Ops Center’s network architecture. Taking its cues from the Web feed format Really Simple Syndication (RSS) we all use to read frequently updated content like blogs or news, xVM Ops Center shuns the old model of a central management server regularly polling its charges and instead adopts a subscription model where agents take the initiative to report up to the mother ship — the satellite server — via distributed proxies.

“The agents talk to proxies, and the proxies talk to the satellite servers,” Teich said, not the other way around.

Sun’s xVM Ops Center agents also mimic RSS in its use of XML over HTTP. This approach, Teich said, helps Ops Center “avoid having to punch holes all over your firewalls, which has always been a nightmare.”

But as impressive as this 5,000 number may be, you’ll have to wait until the second quarter of 2008 and version 2.0 for Sun xVM to actually be able to manage xVM, the Xen-based hypervisor. “Version 1.0 doesn’t include Xen management; that’s because we don’t have it yet,” Teich said. For now, xVM Ops Center is limited to managing physical machines running Linux or Solaris [Windows support is forthcoming, although no date has been specified]. For tasks within a virtual environment, “customers today would probably use VMware [VirtualCenter].” That’s OK, though, because for now, about 75% of Sun’s “many hundreds of customers” for N1SM and Sun Connection are still running in a physical environment.

Sun has released pricing for xVM Ops Center: $10,000 for the central satellite server and $100 to $350 per managed instance, or guest.

1  Comment on this Post

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • chris rosentreter
    i think that its great that sun is coming out with new items. im sure later on today/tommarrow the stocks should be up. however, i think they should increase the price to upgrade or buy the new unit, because if it costed the company 10,000 dollars for a product that theyre not sure will completely improve the business and income of the company, i think for the units that are bought they should be improved to 250-500 bucks. even thoguh thats a big jump, since there are different versions of the program, they should have different prices at a highter rate. like they make it seem like it will do good, and hopefully it does, but still theres always the risk of people saying "oh, thats not that big of a deal, sure, its an upgrade, but still" from what i read al that the upgrade will do is improve the service in more places. ive heard that the service already is very good in most places, improving it will give gaurenteed satisfaction for everyone everywhere. since this seems like a good product overall thy should increase the price. now some people might say drop it. but why? if its gonna do goos, make the price high. thats what they did with the iPhone, they made the price high and different prices for different units. however, what nintendo did with the Wii was brilliant. they went and said, k lets make an amazing game system and charge less than the leading game systems. since they did that, people still, 1 year later, are sleeping outside on the ground for it. i mean the idea of someone being that desperate for something for 250 bucks is undescribable. yet theyre making alot of money, sun isnt that way. theyre not a headline making corperation, its understandable to have the prce be higher than what you can get for say apple or dell. thats myn opinion!
    0 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: