View From Above

Jun 13 2011   5:40AM GMT

iPad Competitors Can’t Play Games

Ron Miller Ron Miller Profile: Ron Miller

BlackBerry Playbook ad on Friday night while watching Game 5 of the Stanley Cup Finals and I was a bit surprised by what I saw. Instead of a tablet aimed squarely at business, I saw one marketed to consumers. If BlackBerry and other iPad competitors want to take on Apple, they can’t compete on the consumer level. They have to make their stand as a business device.

IT Pros won’t be swayed by Angry Birds and the ability to play movies. They want a device that plays nicely with their enterprise software and that integrates with existing enterprise security systems. In fact, there are probably many more conservative organizations out there after seeing an ad like that, which might see these devices, not as productivity tools, but consumer toys, making them all the less likely to make the investment.

And that seems to be the general problem for the growing list of iPad competitor devices. None of them seem to realize that they’ll never compete with iPad and its 25 million served. Instead, they have to carve a niche. To me that niche, should be a device that caters strictly to business.

These devices are competing on a number of levels including hardware quality, the operating system and how well it integrates into enterprise services. Then there is price and finally and most important, there are the supported apps in whatever app distribution system the device has.

The PlayBook by all accounts certainly has the great hardware. It’s a BlackBerry, so chances are, it will play nicely in the enterprise. Pricing is competitive with iPad, but it’s severely lacking in apps. Unless it can jump start its developer ecosystem quickly, it’s a nice piece of technology without a lot of practical application for business users.

Last week, HP announced the new TouchPad running WebOS will go on sale July 1st with a price for a 16GB model starting at $499.99, the exact same price as the 16GB iPad and the 16GB PlayBook. Given the sophistication of the hardware involved, and Apple’s supply chain acumen, it’s apparently hard for competitors to cut pricing much below that, although undercutting the iPad by $50 or even $100 would certainly make these devices (all things being equal of course) more attractive to organizations looking to introduce tablets, but shy about making a big investment.

It’s also unclear how well stocked the TouchPad application store will be. As John Paczkowski wrote on All Things Digital on Friday, “As I’ve said before, its application and content ecosystem might need growing, but the TouchPad looks like it’s got a decent shot at becoming the frontrunner in the massing horde of tablet hopefuls chasing Apple’s iPad.”

That’s a big if though because the success of any of these devices competing with the iPad is going to hinge on the number and quality of their apps. Nice hardware and a well-designed OS is not going to be enough to propel any of these tablets past Apple.

The only way to sell against Apple right now, as I see it, is to make your tablet the must-have *business* device. Forget about Angry Birds. The users may crave that, but the IT pros supporting them and the CIOs buying them want these devices to mean business first and foremost.

Photo by IntelFreePress on Flickr. Used under Creative Commons License.

3  Comments on this Post

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • Spdhar
    This is a very good argument and yes indeed as things look now, the only way an iPad competitor can hope to mount an effective challenge is to aim at the enterprise market. Tablet deployment for the enterprise market comes with a security concern and even there a recent security shootout documented by CIO magazine [A href=""] found the RIM Playbook best of breed - followed closely by the iPad and Android a serious threat. Will that mean that people will now need two tablets - one for personal use, the iPad and the other for work use since the enterprise tablet will most certainly have lock down policies on what apps can be downloaded and used and not ? I think effective enterprise deployment will be through a Citrix Receiver type of a virtual desktop onto the employee owned iPad for it to be. A tablet aimed purely at enterprise will also in my opinion not have enough going for it to succeed - unless it is something that the enterprise hands you when you log into the office and takes back when you leave - like say in a hospital environment.
    0 pointsBadges:
  • Ron Miller
    I agree. Many companies will let users have the iPad (especially if executives want it) and use tools to provide secure access to the company network. But the other players have to find a way to compete with Apple's dominance and making an enterprise-friendly device is one way to do that. Thanks for commenting. Ron
    580 pointsBadges:
  • Spdhar
    QNX - RIM's new OS has a lot going for it but and if only the new owners had the kind of vision and marketing wherewithal that Apple has. Among all the tablet OS's out there - this has the most technically brilliant solution but will they win or even so much as make a dent compared to iOS?
    0 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: