Mainframe Propeller Head

Aug 17 2009   12:56PM GMT

One end user’s comments on the mainframe dilemma

Mark Fontecchio Mark Fontecchio Profile: Mark Fontecchio

Last week I spoke with Chris O’Malley, the head of CA’s mainframe business unit and a keynote speaker at the upcoming Share conference in Denver, about some of the challenges facing mainframers today. Jim Hood, a mainframer at Siemens Healthcare, wrote to me and had this to say in reply:

“Cost, I think, is primarily at the heart of the mainframe dilemma:  hardware, software and people.   Skills, or the concern of those disappearing over time, is secondary.  Hardware and software costs, and the perception that these are so much higher than a compatible server based operation, helps fuel the urge to displace this platform.  I still cannot be convinced that the TCO is significantly higher than that of running thousands of servers when you add license costs, all the replaceable components and ongoing support (manpower) for upgrades, maintenance, asset management, etc.  Even so the movement continues.

The related costs for the skill sets needed to run a mainframe operation is the other fly in the ointment.    Older mainframe programmers/analysts get a bad rap from a cost standpoint even though their long tenure at many organizations has made them successful (the business and themselves) while their long, loyal labor yielded advancement and increased salaries.  That isn’t a good mix in today’s marketplace where low costs rule.  I wonder what happens when the same scenario plays out 20 years from now when the current younger, lower cost workers are not so young or low cost anymore.

I’m not sure if there are any real replacement plans from a talent standpoint.  That would mean acquiring “young” labor while keeping “older” labor which means increasing costs even more.  In today’s world cost reductions don’t have the luxury of time on their side — immediacy rules — so while there might be a concern about keeping talent the reality, I think, largely depends upon a balance sheet.   Even for those who could stay (to mentor) many mainframers have already been in the business 30-40 years.   It is going to take a lot of activity to get the twentysomethings thinking that zOS is cool.  By the time that happens (if ever) there won’t be many mentors left — whether by choice or not.”

1  Comment on this Post

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • spintreebob
    You'd think that especially in IT, decisions would be based on facts and logic. But in my many years of consulting to many shops that does not appear to be the case. For a time the fad was [I]nobody was ever fired for buying blue[/I]. Now we have the flavor of the month in terms of both hardware and software. SOA? Virtualization? ITIL? My product claims to be both, depending on what's hot and what's not. In reality technology only needs 2 tiers, the user's PC with a browser, memory and diskdrive and a database server. All the multi-tier hype is a creation of vendors who realize that the more tiers and the more complexity they can put in the flavor of the month, the more hardware and software products they can sell. Z's big challenge is to convince decision makers who want to play it safe by buying what everyone else is buying that the cost of the complexity of a multi-tier system is more than the cost of having all that complexity loaded into a single complete system. But so far that sales pitch is not cool. It's not hip. So we continue with emotional decisions rather than logical decisions.
    70 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: