Will a directional antenna with higher db output make much of a difference

Wireless Access Points
The following question was submitted to SearchNetworking.com editors. Can you help? I am trying to set up a wireless access point to cover a couple of apartments near an office on a small campus. I set up an access point in the office, but cannot get a connection about 50 feet away in one of the apartments due to the intervening walls. There are three walls that the signal needs to go through, two of which are 1 foot thick adobe. My question is, will a directional antenna with higher db output make much of a difference, or is that more about distance than penetrating through the walls? -- Doug D. --------------------------------- Kara Gattine Associate Editor, SearchNetworking.com and SearchMobilecomputing.com

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

Radio 101 – signal strength is signal strength and how you use it up to you. If you take the base definition of an omnidirectional antenna as being value 1, then the transmit power (output of access point) is distributed evenly in a spherical pattern with the WAP at the center. Ideal for a multi-story house with the WAP in the middle.
A ‘directional’ antenna gets its ‘gain’ from forcing more energy into a ‘torus’ (doughnut) shape, usually in the horizontal plane while reducing the signal up and down.
Unfortunately you said ‘adobe’ walls. Signal absorbtion (loss passing through walls) is a function of density of the material, metallic content, and water content. WAPs use frequencies readily absorbed by water (cell phone dropouts in the rain), metal studs (twice as limiting as wood), and crystal lattice structure (cement and sand in adobe). You may need an outside antenna at one or both ends and a WAP repeater.

Discuss This Question: 1  Reply

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.
  • LisaPhifer
    Directional antennas focus a transmitter's output power into a narrower field. In free space, that makes radio signal travel farther. When obstacles like walls are present, the power delivered to the near-side of the wall will be higher with a directional antenna than with an omni antenna. If the wall merely absorbed RF energy, a higher-power signal would indeed have a better chance of propagating completely through the wall. However, all walls are not equal. Some surfaces (like metal) reflect RF instead of absorbing it. For example, a window covered by steel blinds will reflect signal, while a stucco wall containing diamond mesh both reflects and absorbs signal, depending upon RF frequency (wavelength). This USC research paper describes attenuation measurements taken through a wide variety of building materials and radio frequencies: "www.am1.us/Papers/E10589 Propagation Losses 2 and 5GHz.pdf" Check out the measurements given for brick, stucco, and cinder block. I have not seen any published specs for adobe walls, but your walls probably contain some type of wire mesh inside them, and of course nearly a foot of mud. A high-gain directional antenna might be somewhat helpful, but ultimately may not provide sufficient coverage where you actually want it in the distant apartment. You may have better luck pursuing another alternative -- for example, Ethernet over Powerline (www.homeplug.org), or connecting WLAN bridges to directional antennas placed just outside windows, aimed at each other.
    1,995 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.


Share this item with your network: