How could IBM have settled at ‘Q’ while naming its system objects?

195 pts.
Tags:
AS 400
IBM AS/400
for e.g. QSYS, QSJSENDER, QCMDEXC, QDDSSRC
1

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

It is least likely to be used by a customer for their naming conventions. You will also similar thinking in a lot of other areas where the use of some letters like O and I are not used because of the similarity to zero and one causing confusion and typos if entering data.

Discuss This Question: 10  Replies

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.
  • Splat
    It's one of the least used letters of the alphabet.
    12,875 pointsBadges:
    report
  • GregManzo
    Splat is correct. Check your Scrabble set - Q is worth 10 points. (So is Z but it's too much of a cliche)
    2,960 pointsBadges:
    report
  • WoodEngineer
    IBM also wanted something which would identify an object as part of the systems infrastructure - something supplied by IBM.
    In the early days of the IBM i's predecessor, System/38, there was a terrific tech magazine named Q38.   
    8,225 pointsBadges:
    report
  • rajat01
    Or maybe, 'cause, the system primarily deals with the data processing, hence Q perfectly represents the importance of 'Queuing Theory' in a data-processing system. Maybe.
    195 pointsBadges:
    report
  • ToddN2000
    True a lot of Q's on the system MSGQ, DTAQ, JOBQ, OUTQ, DSTQ, USRQ, PRTQ, DPCQ, FAXQ.
    132,760 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Splat
    But no Qbert.
    12,875 pointsBadges:
    report
  • ToddN2000
    @Splat: They did but he jumped ship :) That brought back memories.
    132,760 pointsBadges:
    report
  • aceofdelts
    I always thought it was because the person who decided had 17 fingers
    2,550 pointsBadges:
    report
  • ej
    I recall that "back in the day" of System 3 and S34 / S36 IBM used # and $ sign to preface their utility programs and they were criticized for being to imperialistic using $ and #. So when they came out with the S38, they chose something less likely to be so controversial.
    70 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Rrbond07
    My understanding is that it is a carry-over from the SYS36 and SYS38.
    750 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following

Share this item with your network: