Excessive JOBLOGS from subfile

230 pts.
Tags:
AS/400
iSeries
Subfile
Since upgrading to 7.1 this past month we are experiencing a problem from one program from a subfile that is causing excessive job logs creating huge spool files. A message will appear in the subfile then its automatically answered with a 'C' and this happens several times in the spool file causing thousands of pages to appear. However, the user does not experience and stoppages or problems.. Is there a way to shut off the logging. Someone here said this happened before when an upgrade was done but no knowledge of how it was dealt with. Here is the message below:
30   03/26/15  07:47:33.615807  QSFGET       QSYS        039C
To module . . . . . . . . . :    PGM01
To procedure  . . . . . . . :   PGM01
Statement . . . . . . . . . :   333200
Message . . . . :   Subfile record not found.
Cause . . . . . :   The input operation to the subfile specified a relative
record number for which no active subfile record exists. Recovery  . . .
See the Application Display Programming book, SC41-5715, for subfile
processing. Possible choices for replying to message . . . . . . . . . .
. . . :   I -- Request is ignored. Control is returned to user. C -- Requ
is canceled. Escape msg CPF5104 is sent.
03/26/15  07:47:33.616061  QMHCHGEM     QSYS        0146

PGM01
To module . . . . . . . . . :   PGM01
To procedure  . . . . . . . :   PGM01
Statement . . . . . . . . . :   333200
Message . . . . :   C
More...
0

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

Discuss This Question: 2  Replies

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.
  • pdraebel
    The PGM attempts to READ a subfile record that does not exist. Check the command on line 333200 that is used to read the subfile. Is an EOF condition monitored?
    7,545 pointsBadges:
    report
  • TheRealRaven
    A similar issue has been reported for a previous release, but it seems it was back maybe 10 or more years ago. Other than the obvious fix of making sure that only 'active' records are accessed from a subfile, you can try recompiling both the DSPF and the program back to a target release of the previous system version. If that works, you should report the problem to IBM.
    33,730 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following

Share this item with your network: