The iSeries Blog

Jan 21 2009   8:54AM GMT

System i hits new low: Revenue down 92%

Leah Rosin Leah Rosin Profile: Leah Rosin

This morning on the radio I heard that IBM had released fourth quarter and 2008 year end results, with the company reporting net income up 12%. But, the System i didn’t fare well in the company’s announced earnings, with a jaw-dropping decrease in revenue of 92% year-on-year. Last quarter, we reported that the System i revenue was down 82%. The explanation is that the company has combined the revenues from Systems i and p in the new converged System p numbers, and no longer attributes any new Power running i sales to the legacy system. On the positive side, revenues from the converged System p server products increased 8%, the only increase for the Systems and Technology hardware segment.

It seems that IBM, a company founded on “machines” has moved on and is now finding success in software, services and financing. In fact, IBM senior vice president and chief financial officer, Mark Loughridge, told a conference call of financial analysts that the company derived 90% of it’s revenue from these segments. But Loughridge shared the company’s optimism going forward, “With the stimulus packages being put in place, the economies will start to improve as we go to the back half of the year. Likewise, for the first quarter our performance will be relatively flat, with growth especially in second half of the year.”

2  Comments on this Post

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • David Smith
    I'm sorry but I have to object to this very misleading headline and article. The platform has been merged ... so of course if IBM has chosed to put the new combined revenue in the "p" column then the "i" column will essentially go to zero. That says nothing about how well the IBM i operating system is doing or how much of the Power Systems sales are driven by the "i" operating system. It could very well be down from last year but I don't think we have enough information in the IBM numbers to accurately say. But to write such a misleading headline is I think irresponsible.
    0 pointsBadges:
  • Cwc
    Perhaps Loughridge was trying to be diplomatic. In reality, these "stimulus packages" aren't going to help at all. When the federal government "spends" billions (and now a trillion) dollars of taxpayer money that doesn't even exist, it only makes the situation worse.
    4,290 pointsBadges:

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: