IoT Agenda

January 26, 2018  2:30 PM

Three ways to drive IoT monetization with connected cars

Nicolas Desmarais Nicolas Desmarais Profile: Nicolas Desmarais
Connected car, Consumer IoT, Data Analytics, IIoT, Internet of Things, iot, IoT analytics, IoT data, OEM, Predictive maintenance

Many consumer IoT companies have struggled to monetize their offerings as effectively as their industrial IoT peers, but some have found the exception. Take connected cars, for example, which are powering nearly half of global consumer IoT revenue. That revenue isn’t just flowing from in-vehicle infotainment features that deliver on improved driver experiences. Automakers are now personalizing the driving experience by giving drivers access to premium services, apps, subscriptions and more in-car and on the web.

Here are three learnings from how leading automotive OEMs have successfully bridged connected devices to drive new revenue streams from IoT:

Turning data into actionable insights

Every connected car generates a treasure trove of data, giving auto manufacturers unprecedented access to user behavior, telematics feedback and environmental data. By collecting and storing all possible usage and sensor-based data for future processing, auto manufacturers can apply analytics to build better products.

AppDirect IoT for Connected Cars

Imagine a dashboard that helps product engineers understand driver usage behavior, or gives insight into wear tracking data from a component manufacturer. With big data analytics, manufacturers can glean insights that provide tangible value to both operations and customer service. Based on this knowledge, new products will be created and existing ones will be improved. Products and services that enable rich experiences for drivers and passengers through wireless updates or streamlines the OEM’s operations will get market traction.

Bringing together customers and suppliers

Creating a dedicated place for customers and suppliers to come together allows auto manufacturers to retain customers and establish new revenue streams long after the initial vehicle purchase. For OEMs, this place is an ecosystem, made up of hardware, software, firmware, content and service providers. However, OEMs need to provide a wireless, secure, branded user experience to monetize this ecosystem.

Deploying a trusted commerce platform lets OEMs test a range of flexible business models from one-time purchase, fractional ownership and pay-per-use (such as Car2Go) to bundles or subscriptions (such as satellite radio or Audi on Demand). With this platform, OEMs can easily offer trials, premium upgrades and feature add-ons to customers, who can discover products and services and have them delivered remotely to their cars. Additionally, the OEM can share sales revenue and reconcile cost sharing with partners.

Providing real-life use cases

Tesla recently averted a costly dealership repair of nearly 30,000 vehicles that had an issue with a charging plug software bug with an over-the-air update. Using predictive maintenance data, OEMs can proactively replace “bad” car parts — a win for them, the car dealer and the driver.

Predictive maintenance uses sensor data generated by the vehicle to determine a defect. The OEM can then shut down that sensor and replace the part as needed. When this happens, like in Tesla’s case, the information can be forwarded to a cloud service which interfaces to find a dealer, and after reaching out to the driver using an app on the vehicle head unit, mobile device or portal schedules the service and orders the required parts.

This scenario ultimately ties the traditional servicing model of vehicles to IoT, enabling intuitive servicing and customer retention.

When considering the capabilities of a connected car, the market will drive IoT monetization. Improving customer service, driver experience and vehicle performance/adaptability through IoT adds ongoing value to connected cars, provided the OEM uses the power of data analytics, a central platform for drivers and developers, and a commerce solution to drive new business models and enhance traditional ones.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 26, 2018  11:07 AM

NFC unlocks opportunities in technology at CES 2018

Paula Hunter Profile: Paula Hunter
CES, consumer experience, Internet of Things, IoT devices, Mobile, NFC, smart home

At CES this year, near field communication (NFC) technology proved itself a dominant technology across a variety of industries. By using a smartphone, NFC can easily be applied to products in the smart home, retail and healthcare areas and beyond.

Truly, NFC technology is becoming a widespread, common (and common sense) technology for consumer and business products. Each of the new products highlighted below and featured at CES can be accessed with a smartphone. To date, there are over 2 billion NFC-enabled devices in the world — almost a quarter of the earth’s population. The future is mobile and NFC is a key enabler for new product development.

The dramatic increase in smartphone usage will only further fuel the innovation and product development using NFC technology. It is exciting to be leading the NFC Forum at this stage of growth and innovation. Here are my four highlights from CES 2018:

L’Oréal’s UV Sense

NFC has officially made its debut in the beauty department. By using L’Oréal’s UV Sense, consumers can learn how much sun they are getting by sticking the My UV Patch onto their thumbnail. My UV Patch, using NFC technology, lets users know when they have had too much sun by tapping their smartphone onto the patch. Once a smartphone communicates with the nail sticker, the L’Oréal UV Sense app can be used to gather information about a person’s skin and how much sun time is too much sun time for that person.

The YesItIs Tag Sensor

This year the YesItIs Tag Sensor brought home one of the 2018 CES Innovation Honoree Awards in the category of smart home. The YesItIs Tag Sensor is a tag that records environmental data, including measuring temperature and humidity levels. The data is accessed by tapping on the tag with your smartphone. From warehouses to construction sites to homes, the YesItIs Tag Sensor keeps track of the surrounding environment with a single tap.

Sony’s Truly Wireless Bluetooth Headphones

Wireless headphones have been done before, but not like Sony’s Truly Wireless Bluetooth Headphones. Featuring the NFC Forum’s N-mark brand prominently on the headphones, they can be paired by tapping a smartphone to the headphones. This is one of the simplest, easiest ways I’ve found to pair two devices. Kudos to Sony!

Selinko’s ‘Product-as-a-Store’ service

Selinko’s newest innovation allows for any object to become a store. Retailers are beginning to avoid the middle man, selling directly to the consumer, and Selinko’s “Product-as-a-Store” service makes this a reality. Tap the object to be purchased with a smartphone to explore the details of a product or make a purchase. Retail is beginning to transform with the use of NFC technology. To learn more about NFC and the consumer’s retail journey, check out the NFC Forum’s next generation retail and brand experience infographic.

This year at CES we saw NFC innovations like never before. NFC technology is being implemented in all different facets of our lives. From home to auto to wearables, NFC technology opens up doors for an almost unlimited array of opportunities. I can’t wait to see what CES has in store for 2019!

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 25, 2018  2:36 PM

When IoT puts the user last

Gordon Haff Profile: Gordon Haff
CES, consumer experience, Internet of Things, iot, IoT devices, smarthome, User experience, UX

Even if you’re not much interested in the latest gadgetry, the massive CES (formerly Consumer Electronics Show) in Las Vegas is worth observing — preferably from afar — for the overarching zeitgeist and emerging trends in IoT, smart home and consumer tech generally.

This is especially true today when consumer tech and business computing are often one and the same. It seems quaint, in this world of smartphones, that BYOD was once a topic of hot debate.

I’m not sure that type of convergence is happening with IoT, though. At least not yet.

Solutions in search of problems

Taylor Lorenz wrote about how “CES was full of useless robots and machines that don’t work.” Her observations pretty much line up with my overall take on smart home devices — so many are solutions in search of problems.

I have a few connected monitoring devices of various sorts in my house. They let me virtually drop in when I’m traveling, which provides some level of comfort.

For the most part, though, smart home gadgetry is aimed at solving problems most of us don’t actually have. Flicking a light switch or going to the door if someone knocks rank very far down the list of things I need to automate and complicate. (Of course, if someone is mobility-impaired I can fully understand why devices to help with these things could be useful, but that’s a corner case.)

Clean the house, wash and put away the dishes, do laundry? In other words, truly interact with the physical world. Now we’d be talking. But most smart home devices can’t actually do any of these things or, if they do, they do so in such a limited way that they’re effectively useless. There are partial exceptions, like the Roomba and its knockoffs, but even those require the right layout of house to be genuinely useful.

Furthermore, a lot of this stuff not only solves problems we don’t have, but does it badly. I’m pretty experienced with electronics and networking and I still fully expect that unboxing one of these creations will be the prelude to an hour or two of cursing, upgrading firmware, rebooting and other aggravations.

User experience rules

By contrast, smartphones and consumer-oriented web apps won because they were better. Consumers liked iPhones and Android phones better than they liked BlackBerry phones. They liked modern, responsive web interfaces better than they liked their enterprise apps.

That’s not hard. Admittedly, a user experience that leads to sending a ballistic missile warning by mistake is a particularly extreme case in point. But, let’s face it, a lot of traditional enterprise apps are pretty user hostile. But consumer IoT hasn’t put user experience in the forefront as successful consumer products do.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

The principles for IoT design are different from more traditional interfaces, but they can still be deliberately designed as Catherine Robson discusses in the video “Building your Internet of Things (IoT) User Experience.”

We can also think about new types of interfaces.

Voice interfaces may be one class of device that has potential both in the home and in business settings. The Amazon Echo in particular apparently had a great holiday season. Amazon promoted and discounted aggressively and, at about $30, it hit a sweet spot for gift giving.

Voice has its challenges as an interface. And once the novelty wears off, a lot of people probably don’t use these assistants for much. But that’s in part because none of them do a very good job of parsing complicated questions. That’s certain to improve over time. And when it does, they could become useful in a variety of situations where you need information or need to give a command without using your hands. (For a simple example, my dentist uses one as a timer.)

Improving the IoT device experience doesn’t have a single solution. It needs design. It probably needs new technologies and approaches that make set up and maintenance more automated. And even after all that, a lot of devices will still be useless.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 25, 2018  10:54 AM

Protecting the car of the future

Andrew Till Profile: Andrew Till
Connected car, Internet of Things, iot, iot security, IoT sensors, Sensors

A recent study found 31% of leading automakers, investors and technology companies say cybersecurity concerns are the biggest obstacle to the growth of connected cars. Cyberhacking of the connected car has even made it to plot lines of blockbuster movies, like the most recent The Fast and the Furious film. Yet, many consumers don’t have an understanding of the severity that cybersecurity threats pose and what goes into protecting the connected car from attacks, nor the solutions necessary to address this challenge.

With a quarter billion connected vehicles expected to be on the road by 2020, one might ask — how can automakers continue to meet the security demands and protect the connected vehicle of the future?

Protecting driverless cars against cyberattacks can be a complex and difficult task, especially as the proliferation of data across different systems and devices makes the car more vulnerable than ever before. However, there are companies leading the way to protecting the car of the future and here is how they are going about it:

Industry leaders are enabling technology to secure the connected car. In order to keep connected cars protected against cybersecurity attacks such as ransomware hacks, companies are creating integrated systems that deliver complete visibility, detection and mitigation capabilities. These security technologies, such as sensor spoofing technology, protect the whole car, from inside to outside. As autonomous vehicles are becoming more real, influencing our industry, from OEMs to Silicon Valley companies and all the way up to The Hill, we must remember that cybersecurity and privacy should be an essential part of the design and development of such vehicles.

Securing the IoT network as whole, from connected vehicles to home devices and cloud technologies, is another way that companies are securing the autonomous vehicle. When thinking about cybersecurity, one cannot just think about a specific device — if the car can communicate with a city-wide IoT network and a traffic light (V2X technology) or with other vehicles (V2V technology), then those “external” networks must be secure as well. It is important the security protocols and regulations be considered when developing new connected products no matter what industry the products will be sold in. Additionally, when securing the connected vehicle, companies have been working on technologies that mitigate and detect cyberattacks from both the vehicle’s internal network and external threats.

Household name technology companies are bringing together cybersecurity partners to keep the connected autonomous car protected. Over the last year, the automotive cybersecurity space has transitioned to a new level of maturity and it has become evident that protecting the connected vehicle needs to be a collaborative effort. In the U.S. for example, the Automotive Information Sharing and Analysis Center (Auto-ISAC) organization was formed in 2015 by OEMs, with top Tier 1 companies, including Harman, joining in 2016, to work proactively on implementing security features into every stage of the manufacturing process as well as to share information on emerging issues. The Society for Automotive Engineering (SAE) has been working on drafting cybersecurity best practices and standards, such as this guidebook published last year, and similar organizations are working in Europe and Japan. The vision for that collaborative effort is definitely becoming a reality.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 24, 2018  4:23 PM

IoT in 2018: Reality checks and real-world applications

Klaus Michael Vogelberg Profile: Klaus Michael Vogelberg
ai, augmented reality, Blockchain, Data Management, Internet of Things, iot, IoT analytics, IoT data, Virtual Reality

The global business world continued to introduce, improve and build upon technologies, applications and platforms in 2017. We saw many innovations that possess the ability to connect to the internet of things enter the market. And others that already carried IoT functionality switched on for the first time. Over the next year, I see the technology world continuing to build next-generation systems with IoT capabilities and functionality. I do, however, think predictions about the global scaling of IoT and its real-world usage will continue to be overblown.

Here are my three key megatrends to watch for over the next year of IoT.

IoT will contribute to workplace productivity

Global enterprises will increasingly turn to data generated from IoT to look internally and improve their respective performances at the technology, output and staff levels. Specifically, executives and human resources teams will use collected data from campus sensors and employee badges to monitor, assess and change staff operations in 2018. Using IoT-connected technologies to gauge employee efficiency will extend to industries that fly under the IoT radar, such as accounting or wealth management. It will lead to companies using outcomes from the collected IoT data to adjust workplace operations in the name of productivity.

IoT will connect to other emerging technologies in the name of data

Data is at the core of global innovation today. The Economist classified it as the world’s most valuable resource, replacing oil. Companies want to build technologies that deliver accurate data to leadership, staff, partners, vendors and customers. Most enterprises also want to collect accurate data about customers in order to better market offerings and build lasting relationships. Once they have that data, they want to use business intelligence platforms, analytics software and other technologies to better optimize it. The public sector, for its part, wants accurate data to provide industry governance, citizen services and improve internal operations.

In 2018, enterprises and agencies that invest more in technologies like AI, blockchain, virtual and augmented reality, cloud and mobile will improve the collection, analysis and delivery of data. IoT will provide an additional enterprise outlet for data optimization. Indeed, interoperability and connectivity between IoT and these next-generation technologies will provide competitive advantages and customer experiences throughout 2018.

IoT will be tested on a global scale

The private sector will pursue data analytics, cloud infrastructure platforms and standalone technologies to make the most of IoT over the next year. In practice for both sectors, this will materialize as a network of sensors on vehicles, proprietary field assets and remote locations funneling actionable information back to a physical office where people can review outcomes. Federal and local governments, for their part, will join technology giants in pursuit of potential real-world applications of IoT in 2018. For the global public sector, IoT will still be a moonshot pursuit, but its utility will become clearer — especially for infrastructure, citizen data and emergency response.

By the end of the year, I believe enterprises and governments pursuing IoT R&D initiatives will have a clearer idea of what works and what doesn’t with IoT.

IoT in 2018 (and beyond)

Over the next year, I see IoT playing a supporting or complementary role to increased workplace connectivity based mostly on enterprise budget, ambitions and sector relevance. Organizations across sectors will tap into IoT to conduct regular business, manage talent and boost productivity. I believe even the public sector will begin to explore IoT research and development in 2018. While we must be realistic about the short-term needs of businesses, without question, IoT will emerge as a viable resource for collecting and mobilizing data across industries and geographies this year.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 24, 2018  10:17 AM

Why it’s critical enterprises address the IoT security blind spot

Nadir Izrael Profile: Nadir Izrael
Access control, Botnet, Internet of Things, iot, iot security, malware, patching

Organizations of all types are facing an emerging security threat in the internet of things — a security threat they have yet to come to grips with. The rapid adoption of connected devices, like webcams, printers, smart watches, HVAC systems, headsets, medical devices and others, has led to a dramatic rise of devices being brought into corporate environments. In fact, Gartner estimates that as many as 8.4 billion devices are now in use. These devices connect employees and access and share critical business information. Unfortunately, companies can’t see or protect the majority of these new IoT devices in and around their businesses. This is the IoT security blind spot. In fact, our research shows companies can’t see 40% of the devices in their organization.

The design and function of IoT devices themselves also pose unique security challenges. There are three core challenges to protecting these new connected IoT devices. First, unlike desktops and laptops, this new wave of smart, connected devices doesn’t get the typical IT treatment, with supervised access control, antivirus and intrusion prevention software. Second, they use new connectivity protocols, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee and others, that are not addressed by traditional security systems, reinforcing the IoT security blind spot. Third, it’s impossible, or at least very impractical, to patch most IoT devices. In many instances, no patches or method for a patch/update even exist. If patches are available, they can take months to be released, and updating the devices is not easy as we experience with our smartphones. The result is billions of devices running antiquated operating systems and modules with documented but unpatched vulnerabilities.

Keep in mind, these devices are built to be accessible and always on, with minimal user maintenance. They are network-capable by default and designed to continually seek out connections, which means they are easy prey for attackers looking for a way into a corporate network. Each of these new devices is the new endpoint, with the ability to reach sensitive corporate data and resources, but without the capability of being secured like a conventional endpoint is.

Taken together, these issues present a near perfect storm of risk — devices that are accessible, vulnerable and unprotected. Enterprises are just now confronting the reality of how to protect themselves.

We’re seeing more vulnerabilities specifically impacting IoT devices, too. Over the last year, there’s been a significant rise in airborne threats targeting IoT devices and using wireless networks. These include Reaper, aka IoTroop, which has infected more than a million IoT devices; the KRACK Wi-Fi encryption vulnerability; the Mirai botnet that took down much of the internet a year ago; and BlueBorne, the critical Bluetooth vulnerability our researchers discovered earlier this year impacting more than 5 billion devices. With attacks and threats like these growing combined with IoT device adoption continuing to scale fast, enterprises are at a critical inflection point. If they don’t address these threats now, more devices will be deployed that aren’t protected and more attacks will be launched with devastating impacts on businesses.

So what can we do?

Protecting connected devices requires a new approach, one that clearly does not require an agent to be installed. That approach won’t work on these new devices. The new approach also needs to identify any device in a company — wired or wireless, on or off the corporate network. It needs to see the real behavior of this device — not just the type of device, but what it is doing and what devices or networks it is trying to connect to. And lastly, it has to be able to sanction devices, letting well-behaving devices access systems and denying access to devices acting suspiciously or improperly.

We’re at a turning point in the development and deployment of IoT devices. The attacks, exploits and vulnerabilities that use the wireless networks the devices use are only going to get worse. Now is the time for a new approach to address this problem. The IoT age can only deliver on the promise of better efficiency, convenience and insights if we ensure that data, devices and networks that rely on it are secure.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 18, 2018  9:55 AM

How machine learning streamlines location data with the Kalman filter

Manisha Raisinghani Manisha Raisinghani Profile: Manisha Raisinghani
Algorithms, Internet of Things, iot, IoT analytics, IoT data, Lms, Logistics, Machine learning, SLA

We have spoken about machine learning and the internet of things as tools to optimize location analytics in logistics and supply chain management. It’s an accepted fact that technology, especially cloud-based, can benefit companies by optimizing routes and predicting the accurate estimated time of arrivals (ETAs). The direct business value of this optimization lies in the streamlining of various fixed and variable costs associated with logistics.

Companies can track the fuel consumption based on distance traveled while calculating instances of acceleration and hard braking. Moreover, companies can use real-time tracking to ensure that different service-level agreements (SLAs), such as elimination of nighttime drive or excessive speed variations, are met. Countries like the United States now mandate electronic logging devices be fitted with the trucks to track active driving hours and patterns.

All this tracking and optimization of factors is dependent on the assumption that the information being captured is accurate. Wrong data around distance traveled can show an inflated or under-par fuel consumption. Here, each situation might lead the company to assume a problem and spend hours fixing something that doesn’t exist. Moreover, the real problem might then be lost and might not get solved. In terms of SLAs, the companies may either erroneously record SLA breaches (or not record them altogether), leading to misunderstandings and invoicing errors.

It is extremely important to focus on clean and accurate data while using it to make business decisions.

The challenges of capturing location data

Let’s quickly understand the constraints while capturing location and movement data:

Tracking hardware
Trackers send out location-based pings in the form of signals. These signals are received by the company and fed into their logistics management system (LMS). The LMS records the movement of resources from the point they leave the originating warehouse until the point they reach their destination. Many companies don’t have the technology to track the resources in real time. However, they enlist the services of tracking and optimization professionals to help them manage their resources.

These tracking companies utilize the location data points (latitude-longitudes) of the resources movement to create a journey map for the trip. This is where errors first get showcased.

While the tracker is sending out location pings, the tracker might send erroneous pings, which could offset the actual route of the resource. For example, the reported location of a vehicle might be 10 meters to the left of its actual position. In the next second, it might be 10 meters to the right. These random fluctuations arise from internal hardware constraints or surrounding network problems (of the vehicle). When this (wrong) data is reported and processed, it gives the illusion that either a. the vehicle traveled more distance that it did, or b. the vehicle sped from one point to another in a short period.

In both scenarios, the proceeding information might lead the company to make an inefficient decision.

Tracking software
At the level of the software used to read and process the location information, there must be a built-in capability to clean and organize the incoming data. However, most tracking companies fail to differentiate between good tracking data and bad tracking data. This leads them to showcase ETAs that are predicted based on wrong data. This means that the delivery would either arrive later than expected or earlier. Hubs keep their own loaders-unloaders free around the time of delivery, and when the ETAs aren’t met, they lose on their time.

Even at the planning stage, the bad data creates forecasting problems, which mean that companies won’t be able to accurately map their costs to their active resources, leading to over or under capacity.

Now, that you know why good data is essential to optimization, here’s how LogiNext solved these problems using the Kalman filter.

Kalman filter: How it works

The Kalman filter is an innovative data cleansing method discovered initially by NASA for its Apollo missions. Since then, the filter has been randomly used for route and location corrections. The idea is that the filter recognizes sudden deviations (impulses) from the average data and marks the possibility of that data being erroneous. When this possibility or probability increases a preset threshold, then the filter auto-adjusts the information to be closer to the points reported before and after the erroneous data.

Machine learning-backed tracking errors and corrections

Tracking errors and corrections

This gives a more accurate set of information. The filter works as a preliminary validation engine for the incoming location information.

We updated and improved the Kalman Filter to add a learning ability to its original filtering process. This means that as the filter processes information, it learns from it and becomes more efficient the next time it is run. If at first run the filter worked with 70% efficiency, then the next time it would run at 72%, then at 78% and then further or until the engine is aware of each possible deviation and error points up to even a few yards. Even when a vehicle is moving at a regular speed or accelerating, the filter would be able to perfectly analyze whether the route (along with historical and current traffic and weather conditions) justifies the recorded tracking points.

In simple words, the updated Kalman Filter would tell whether the information being fed into the LMS is absolutely accurate or not. All bad data is dumped into a different database (which is again used as a benchmark to adjust all following information). The filter may recognize, for example, that when a vehicle moves along Route A while crossing a specific territory in the evening between 4:00-5:00 pm, the tracking information recorded tends to fluctuate due to detention, speeding, network issues or any other reason. It would clean and adjust the information to make it consistent and usable.

Applications of the Kalman filter in logistics management

Here is some of the actual tracking information received from erroneous hardware or infrastructure:

Machine learning-backed Kalman filter before corrections

Kalman filter before corrections

It can be seen that the overall distance recorded would be higher than the actual distance the vehicle traveled. Even the ETA might be recalibrated, which might create warehousing and workforce problems (as mentioned earlier). With connectivity between hardware within vehicles, cellphone towers, servers and so forth improving every day, there still exist some processing errors that come up from time to time creating bad data. This bad data, when fed into the ERP of a company, then leads to errors and over or underestimations in planning. This leads to excess or shortage of resources or inventory, further leading to losses and inefficiency. This would eventually affect the end customer or client and damage the brand value of the company.

The covering layer of software must compensate for these errors. Hence, our machine learning enabled the Kalman Filter to run in real time along with real-time tracking of resources and fleet. This updated version of the filter is light and can be run instantaneously as the tracking information comes in. There is almost no lag between data reception, cleaning, adjustment and reporting. This means that when the manager views the traffic information in her dashboard, what she views is the accurate location, orientation and speed of each vehicle at any moment in time.

Machine learning-backed Kalman filter after corrections

Kalman filter after corrections

As a part of the analytic reports, trip information such as route deviations, detention, delays and speed are all absolutely accurate. As we have seen earlier, this filter gets better the more it is run. So, each progressive report would be far more accurate than the previous one.

Accurate information helps companies take proper strategic decisions with a higher probability of success. It’s simple: if we work with the right information, the planning would be more precise, with a higher chance of on-time deliveries, lessened delays, greater resource utilization and higher customer and client satisfaction.

The updated Kalman filter, hence, adds to the growing progress towards creating more and more value for industry 4.0 using the internet of things.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 18, 2018  9:48 AM

Why you need to design for analytics to succeed at IoT

Dean Hamilton Profile: Dean Hamilton
Data Analytics, Internet of Things, iot, IoT analytics, IoT data, Personalization

As companies in a variety of industries plan and execute their digital transformation strategies, powered by the internet of things, they should be designing everything — products, applications, sensors, networks, services, etc. — with one all-encompassing goal: to maximize the value of the data they create or ingest.

The key to maximizing that value is analytics. Timely, reliable, accessible, trustworthy analytics is the future battlefield on which IoT wars will ultimately be won or lost. Without significant data analytics investments, most organizations have little hope of making sense out of all the data generated by IoT, and of gaining real value for themselves and their customers.

With so many constantly connected devices, we now have an opportunity to learn about how products really work — or don’t work — over a period of time in a customer environment such as a home, school, workplace, healthcare facility or other environment.

A new product, created for today’s connected world, should be designed to analyze the usage patterns, effectiveness and performance of the real-world production instances in the hands of actual customers. The main goal of doing so is to inform the development of future products and services, so they can increase in quality, effectiveness and customer satisfaction.

Getting personal

IoT gives manufacturers an opportunity to rethink what it means to bring a product to a mass market. It opens up possibilities of whole new ways of offering products on a personalized basis, because everyone uses products differently or has different goals or purposes in mind when they buy and use products.

Manufacturers in general, and consumer goods makers specifically, are starting to explore moving away from the traditional industrial model of building low product variability with high volume. For decades, companies have been building lots of things that basically look and act the same. With that model, everyone buys essentially the same thing, or the same thing with perhaps a slight variation such as the size, color or style of the product. But in today’s market, more consumers are looking for personalization, unique customized offerings that are designed and made just for them and tailored to meet their needs.

Part of this trend has been driven by the rise of technology such as 3D printing. This enables mass customization, or the production of personalized goods or services that meet customers’ needs. Mass customization aims to deliver individualized products while maintaining the low costs enabled by mass production.

But connected devices also allow the products to adapt themselves in the field, realigning their capabilities and learning from customers’ preferences to provide uniquely personal product experiences.

Thriving through analytics

In a recent interview, Mark Bregman, senior vice president and CTO at NetApp, described “data thrivers” as “those organizations building their business around data and then deciding what business to be in.” This thinking represents a profound shift in how businesses make product decisions.

For instance, a maker of cosmetic products for women could deploy a connected cosmetics case that would be able to discern which products a consumer is actually using, how frequently she is using them and the current level of each consumable.

A cloud-connected application could not only determine when to provide just-in-time resupply, but might also use a built-in camera to provide makeup suggestions. Based on the customer’s usage patterns, certain personalized cosmetics blends could be offered just for that unique customer’s needs. The possibilities are endless.

The key to making this whole process — or a similar process with a different set of products — work is to design the products with data collection and advanced analytics in mind from the beginning. The products themselves will then become a principal source of valuable information to inform the future business strategy. Data thrivers will be organizations that embrace an analytics-led business strategy as intensely as other more traditional business disciplines.

Operational intelligence and digital twins

A significant component of designing for analytics is the digital twin, which is a near-real-time digital replica of a physical asset, process or system that can be used for various purposes. This digital representation of a product instance provides a historical record of its operating performance throughout its lifecycle.

Companies can compare electronic “twins” of real products with the design model to learn how they can enhance future products. Advanced analytics technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, can be used to create dynamic digital simulation models that update as their physical counterparts change, providing insights into potential customer service issues before they impact customers.

This type of near-real-time advanced analytics is at the heart of an operational intelligence revolution that promises to allow companies to provide better warranties and service levels, while reducing support costs and increasing customer engagement and affinity.

Traditional business intelligence analytics will also be informed by accumulated sensor data and help to optimize strategic decisions. But it is an impending revolution in operational intelligence that promises to produce the most compelling benefits for connected product manufacturers.

Challenges ahead

Of course, the whole idea of gathering and analyzing personal data about how products are used is not without challenges. Product companies will need to offer significant incentives and benefits for customers to want to share such information. Sufficient safeguards of personal privacy, transparency about who owns product usage data, and controls affecting what such information can be used for must be provided.

But these concerns should not stop companies from embracing this new era of connected, personalized products that will ultimately deliver better customer experiences and financial gain for businesses. Companies such as Amazon, Google and Apple, with their in-home digital assistants, are already proving that consumers will embrace connected devices that deliver both utility and security. The common thread between these companies is that they have data and analytics in their DNA. The transformative companies of the future will be the ones that rebuild their organizations to fully embrace these disciplines.

By designing for analytics, even the most unsophisticated companies (or products) can be transformed into digital powerhouses of tomorrow.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 17, 2018  2:50 PM

How IoT can provide greater value to the agriculture industry

Karina Popova Profile: Karina Popova
Agriculture, farmers, Internet of Things, iot, IoT analytics, IoT data

Real-time agricultural data contains knowledge about what the farming industry needs, how to make production more efficient and how to establish a better IoT market for the agriculture industry.

IoT provides a greater profit to farmers

Agriculture is usually called an industry that has much to win by securing the internet of things. We used to hear that it could be “the first big industrial IoT market.” Progress in technology provides farmers the capability to automatically handle actual information about the status of soil, water and crops. Though the potential of IoT to transform farming productivity, improve economic performance and increase yield is best achieved when linked to data analytics and machine learning.

Besides this, production costs rise — including prices of seeds, water, electricity and machinery. This is putting stress on agribusinesses to more efficiently employ resources and increase production.

Manual data gathering methods make it challenging to reach optimum levels of effectiveness, particularly given the geographic areas in the agriculture arena. Technology today is playing a more significant role in this. The sophistication of smart sensors, internet-enabled devices, software applications and cloud data storage facilities are providing enormous amounts and types of data to be captured, stored, manipulated and supplied into decision-support tools to control decisions.

Greater intelligence for agriculture industry

Proper data analysis will add meaningful value to agribusinesses. Greater intelligence can be extracted when data sets are merged with other data sets.

There are plenty of use cases that prove how combined data sets are providing greater value to farmers. For example, data collected from soil sensors and crop monitoring systems are being coupled with climate data, which is empowering farmers to make better decisions to boost crop yields. On several farms, sensors and monitoring systems are connected to automated watering systems to prepare ideal soil conditions, expedite healthy plant growth and maximize product turnover.

In addition, livestock monitoring systems can store real-time information regarding the geolocation of the sheep, as well as biometric data about activity, weight, blood, heart rate and other parameters that can assist with decisions about health, welfare and reproduction.

Limitations for IoT in agriculture

The number and types of challenges associated with smart farming ranges across various agricultural production systems, and infrastructural limitations apply when it comes to IoT implementation. Many areas have poor connectivity, with comparatively higher cost and slower speed than the services available in urban areas. Lack of access to mobile coverage can be a major obstacle to technology adoption, with many urging the government to justify available funding to secure equal access to infrastructure in rural areas. Most areas will have some kind of 3G or 4G connectivity, but in numerous cases, it’s rather poor.

The main question agriculture leaders have to ask themselves is “How can I get data when and where I need it?” Based on more advanced sensors appearing on the market, the top question is: “How can I use the sensors and data to expand sales and decision-making processes?”

IoT strategy in agriculture industry

It seems simple, but making the first step is tough. The first reasonable move is to follow the “think big, start small” strategy.

Hopefully, the internet of things will bring the industry where it has never been. It is essential to develop a deeper knowledge of IoT benefits and risks while testing agriculture ideas. Keep successes and learn from failures, and constantly search a little bigger — establishing powerful techniques for better research.

With precision agriculture as an industrial IoT market, the compensation for society can be tremendous.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

January 17, 2018  1:40 PM

Why citizens should be the digital heartbeat of every smart city

Seeta Hariharan Seeta Hariharan Profile: Seeta Hariharan
Internet of Things, iot, IoT applications, IoT devices, Smart cities, smart city, User experience

With 70% of the world’s population expected to live in urban areas by 2050, the allure of the urban lifestyle is making cities the place to be. Like other historical migrations, it’s causing a wave of disruption followed by new challenges and social consequences.

At the top of the list are extraordinary burdens placed on city infrastructure and limited financial resources to deal with them. Population booms are also forcing cities to face greater competitive pressures for investment, talent and opportunities.

Like their tech-savvy residents, cities are choosing smart technology to improve their prospects. They’re investing in smart highways, bridges, buildings, water systems, transportation and streetlights. Navigant Research predicts the global market for smart city solutions and services will skyrocket from $40.1 billion in 2017 to $94.2 billion by 2026.

Massive improvements in the performance and price of technologies like the cloud, processing power, storage and bandwidth have left a fertile landscape for smart city projects. With a growing appetite for data from the physical world, the number of IoT devices will soar from 11 billion today to 80 billion by 2025, according to IDC.

Promising new sources of data outside traditional urban domains are now available to city planners from non-governmental organizations, local businesses and technology firms. Like an artist with a giant canvas and an endless palette, they have an abundance of data at their disposal to design smart cities that were unimaginable until recently.

A perfect storm of enabling technologies. Diverse sources of data. Overburdened infrastructure. Competitive pressures. The conditions for building smart cities have never been more promising.

Yet, there may be a colossal disconnect with the citizens who stand to benefit.

Here’s why: The proliferation and faster adoption of digital technology over the past decade has conditioned consumers to think and behave differently. While most citizens are avid consumers of digital technology, the appeal of the latest innovation for them is changing. It’s no longer just about the latest gadgets, but rather their potential to improve how they experience their digital and physical worlds. (Which they now perceive as one, thanks to their constant interactions with their favorite brands.)

Not long ago, buying and learning new technology was a big deal for consumers. Besides coming with a high price tag, products like PCs and software packages required a steep learning curve before delivering meaningful benefits.

Today, the way we experience technology is vastly different. Low-cost or free innovations, such as smartphone apps powered by augmented intelligence, are ubiquitous, easy to use and constantly enhanced. Embedded technology is so tightly woven into our everyday lives we don’t notice it. We seamlessly adopt new technology across our digital and real worlds because the complexity is largely hidden. Benefits like finding the best price on a pair of shoes or expanding our social network are immediate, tangible and measurable.

This instant gratification we’ve grown to expect from smart technology is causing an interesting social phenomenon. It’s conditioning us to desire and expect specific outcomes and experiences instead of acquiring things that promise them.

This shift to wanting — and immediately expecting — rewarding experiences is sometimes called the outcome economy. It’s generating growth in sectors associated with immediate experiences, like dining and travel, but negatively impacting others, such as traditional retail.

In this context, the goal of smart cities is to help citizens take advantage of the positive outcomes they’ve grown accustomed to experiencing as consumers across their unified digital and physical worlds.

Consider Airbnb. It’s not just selling rooms for rent. It’s offering richer, more satisfying and personalized travel experiences — such as violin making in Paris or hunting for truffles in Tuscany. Through experiences with Airbnb, consumers interact with multiple brands that comprise an ecosystem of value within easy reach.

To survive and thrive, cities need to reach further, too.

Around the world, there’s an influx of smart city technology in urban environments — public transportation, utilities, parks, arenas and recreational spaces — with much more planned. So, why can’t citizens get the same great experiences from their city that they do from their favorite consumer brands?

Urban leaders could start by learning from successful consumer brands. Instead of promoting products, they’re obsessed with meeting the rising expectations of today’s empowered consumer with great experiences. For cities, this means putting citizens at the heart of smart city strategies to meet the higher expectations and logical outcomes they expect.

To do so, public sector leaders must open their eyes to the potential of data from across and even outside of traditional urban domains to deliver better, more holistic experiences for citizens — like making cities feel safe and welcoming. This requires treating citizens like the unique consumers they are, truly understanding their wants, needs and expectations.

Cites should assume the role of savvy marketer: capturing insights from diverse data sources, analyzing them in real time, and constructing highly personalized offers and opportunities as part of a larger ecosystem of value that citizens welcome and expect. In such a city:

  • A water main break will automatically alert citizens taking the bus along affected routes, immediately sending new travel options that save them time by analyzing real-time water and transportation data in unison.
  • City residents will feel safer after an automobile accident because streetlights will brighten automatically to enhance public safety, even notifying first responders when crowds gather.
  • Tourists will feel welcome in foreign cities despite visiting during peak congestion periods. They’ll be guided by personalized journeys based on real-time data from environmental sensors, transportation data, crowd movements and major city events in progress.
  • Employees working the night shift will feel a sense of well-being and security on their commute because streetlights will automatically brighten in areas with rising crime rates.

As more cities embrace an outcome-based approach to their smart city strategies, citizen expectations will rise. Like smart businesses, cities will compete to offer the winning experiences citizens expect.

All IoT Agenda network contributors are responsible for the content and accuracy of their posts. Opinions are of the writers and do not necessarily convey the thoughts of IoT Agenda.

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: