Health IT Pulse

May 17 2012   11:32AM GMT

Study: It’s workflow, not EHR implementation that begets quality

Don Fluckinger Profile: Don Fluckinger

Tags:
EHR implementation
Meaningful use

A three-year study published in the May-June issue of Annals of Family Medicine, at first blush, doesn’t make a good case for EHR implementations. Its findings showed that for 16 practices in the eastern U.S. — treating almost 800 diabetes patients — outcomes measured by A1C, actually, were worse on average than 26 practices using dead trees for their health records.

That should give critics of EHRs and those who enjoy criticizing federal health IT policy in general as a giant government boondoggle plenty of ammunition. Great.

But, looking over the findings by the authors from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey’s School of Public Health, it appears from their results that another principle’s in play we’ve heard consultants and analysts endlessly repeat: Installing an EHR system doesn’t fix anything. If there are problems in a provider’s workflow before flipping the switch on an EHR, those problems will persist despite the technology investment.

The researchers focused on EHR features that enable population care, a coming hotspot as accountable care organizations will hold physicians accountable for chronic disease quality of care measures among their patients.

“In EHR-using practices,” the authors write, “leaders should focus on engaging all members of the health care team in redesigning work to support efforts to improve population care–whether or not their current system supports these efforts.”

They authors go on at length to speak of meaningful use and education of physicians, making recommendations for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT and putting some responsibility on vendors for making EHR systems more usable. They also detail, quite thoughtfully, the limitations of their study (i.e., they did not choose the study participants to offer a true national reflection of the U.S. health system, and furthermore the providers in the study were early EHR adopters — things might be different now).

While the study does have its limitations, it’s good to see EHR implementations analyzed in the mode of a randomized clinical trial, which one would think would yield more accurate results than the more frequent vendor studies or surveys we see almost daily. More and more of these studies are cropping up in scholarly journals.

Now, all we need to guard against is a politically charged press manipulating the numbers to create falsehoods — such as “Hey! I thought EHRs were supposed to solve all our problems, and look here, these researchers call it a complete waste!” when in fact, time and time again these studies merely reaffirm that providers need to solve their workflow problems…before installing the EHR. And, as the authors put it, consider how that EHR implementation might change workflows — and prepare for it.

10  Comments on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • Don Fluckinger
    Study: It’s workflow, not EHR implementation that begets quality #meaningfuluse http://t.co/2bLN5xbg
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Craig Byer
    @DonFluckinger: Study: It’s workflow, not #EHR implementation that begets quality #meaningfuluse http://t.co/xWYtvdIT” #HITsm #HCSM
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Jenny Laurello
    MT @DonFluckinger: Study: It’s workflow, not #EHR implementation that begets quality #meaningfuluse http://t.co/zk5BXHGe #HealthIT
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • IQMax
    MT @DonFluckinger: Study: It’s workflow, not #EHR implementation that begets quality #meaningfuluse http://t.co/zk5BXHGe #HealthIT
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Charles Webster, MD
    Need BPM-style workflow RT @DonFluckinger Study It's workflow not EHR implementation that begets quality #meaningfuluse http://t.co/TPo9wuZO
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • SearchHealthIT
    http://t.co/5d4m3xGo Don't blame #EHR implementation for poor care quality if workflow issues still exist #healthIT
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • Pivasys
    RT: SearchHealthIT: http://t.co/mg70ufvg Don't blame #EHR implementation for poor care quality if workflow issues still exist #healthIT
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • HealthcareMG
    http://t.co/5d4m3xGo Don't blame #EHR implementation for poor care quality if workflow issues still exist #healthIT
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • ICMCC News Page » Study: It’s workflow, not EHR implementation that begets quality
    [...] Article Don Fluckinger, Health IT Pulse, 17 May 2012 Article (Crosson 2012) [...]
    0 pointsBadges:
    report
  • John Smith
    Study finds integrating workflow into #EHR is key to quality | http://t.co/GQAdE4XJ
    0 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: