The Business-Technology Weave

December 30, 2012  2:12 PM

Social Media: Impacting juries and fairness of trials?

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

According to Ohio Lawyer magazine, approximately 60% of judges in this country are providing social media guidance to juries during trial.

Frankly:  Why is this not 100%?

Almost every profession and discipline has been through, and continues to go through, embarrassing episodes due to “inside” personnel making exposures of information to the public, all-too-frequently through social media.  A great example, local to me, is a large healthcare complex in town:  Caregivers were discussing patients in a very critical manner on social media, and referring to them by name and room number.  If professional people with special training, clearances, and access are falling prey to the temptation to gossip online, then imagine what juries are tempted to do, particularly absent firm direction and guidance regarding social media.

Note:  This is not to say, or imply, that juries can’t be comprised of professional people.  Nor is it to impugn very intelligent and savvy tradespeople, or intelligent, informed, homemakers and so forth; however, I don’t care how educated, trained, or experienced a potential jury member is in their area of occupation – absent appropriate care, concern, and caution regarding the discussion of cases on social media, that jury member is defective.

Many State Bar Associations and allied jury instruction committees have been releasing jury instructions for some time, in order to educate and remind members that the bar to discussing the case outside of court and outside of sanctioned jury deliberations, is strictly verboten – and of course this includes social media, e-mail, the internet, and anything else related, such as comment fields in news stories, live chats, and indeed “on the internet or on any electronic device including cell phones.”  Hmmm… they might want to update that last with “mobile device.”

Judges are also well-advised to remind jurors of consequences such as mistrials and wasted time.  Presently, abuse of social media will result in dismissal from the trial, but watch for that to change:  Soon, I believe it is likely that discussion and divulgence of trial information to social and allied media by a juror will result in prosecution and punishment.

December 29, 2012  12:22 PM

Ambiguity Revisited: Buying U.S. Bonds? Be forewarned –

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

I’m hearing more and more stories of this nature:  Of system ambiguities, breakages, confusions, outright dead-ends… paired with so-called “helpdesk” functions that are virtually no help at all.  We spoke about an example here a few weeks ago.

It seems that the Treasury Department has a new online system for the purchase of “digital bonds.”  According to Susan Tompor, personal finance columnist for the Detroit Free Press, this is the first Holiday season that paper U.S. savings bonds are not being sold at banks.

Not to worry:  You can go to for the digital bonds.  The discontinuation of paper bonds is a cost cutting measure.  However, it seems that the online system is cumbersome at best, downright confusing for the most part, and in many cases either leaves the potential purchaser exiting the system in total frustration (absent purchase), or worse, debits a purchaser’s card for more than anticipated for any particular bond.

Ms. Tompor has been in contact with readers who have had to e-mail the TreasuryDirect helpdesk several times in order to successfully navigate the system.  One reader said he spent significant parts of three days trying to make purchases… and was never successful.  Let’s recognize something obvious here, but extremely important:  If you’re selling something, the absolute last thing you need is to have an ambiguous, obtuse, select-and-order system.

Apparently too there have been significant changes involving the amount of money required vis-à-vis the face value of bonds, but many customers, due no doubt to pesky system ambiguities, have found this out the hard way, racking up unanticipated debit amounts on their cards.

Making matters worse is something that I’m finding to be the rule these days, rather than the exception:  Helpdesks that are inaccessible due to hold times that go on forever – literally.

It shouldn’t be that hard to craft systems that are relatively easy to use.  Of course, broken systems and dysfunctional project teams are partly what keep yours truly in clover, but ultimately I tell everyone the same basic thing:  Imagine you’re using the system you’ve just designed for the first time; look at it through a User’s eyes.  Where are the ambiguous decision points and paths?  Make clear where the user is to go, based on what they’re trying to do.  Imagine yourself “going wrong” in the system – force yourself to look for areas where a new user can go astray – and then fix the potentials for, and liabilities of, bad outcomes.

Of course, this smoothing of systems should be going on during all points of the project; in initial design, but certainly through various iterations and versions of betas during testing.  If, after due diligence, you, as the system designer, are not sure just how “user friendly” a system is – throw up a dialog box, some questions, and force the user down the correct fork in the road – as much as possible.  We’ve all seen good systems and bad.  Getting it right just requires a little care, concern, and imagination.

Just these two simple words, foremost in mind, can stave off all manner of problems:

Smash ambiguity.

December 27, 2012  10:53 AM

Early Networking: Intercontinental Jam Session

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

Regular readers of this blog may know that I collect records – “vinyl,” “LPs,” “33s”, “78s,” “45s” – I even have Edison disks and cylinders (and the related players).

Mine is a formal record library, with sections for Rock, Jazz, Blues, Bluegrass, early Country, Classical, Folk – maybe a few other genres…

Recently I stumbled across a most interesting jazz album, recorded and released in 1959, entitled “One World Jazz.”  It involves 15 leading jazzmen – but don’t mistake it for “Big Band” – it’s in the pocket of that nice late-‘50s/early’60s progressive jazz, of which I’m particularly fond.

But here’s the amazing thing:  This session bridged three continents, and the cities are New York, Stockholm, Paris, and London – with musicians on one laying down tracks, with subsequent shipment of tapes to the second continent and addition of additional musicians, and then to the third continent, and… you get the idea.

Of course, today this would be a small feat:  digital files can be swapped around the world almost immediately, for contributions and additions of all sorts.  In fact, soon – if not already – it will be possible to be jammin’ live, in real time, with any number of people, dispersed around the globe.  Imagine:  Sitting in a room, either alone or with a few other players, and having some video and speaker monitors in the room – your intercontinental friends are in the band in a “virtual” sense, and you collaborate and lay down tracks.  Pretty powerful.

For those interested, the LP is on Columbia, with catalog number WL 162.  Musicians are:

In New York:  J.J. Johnson, trombone; Ben Webster, tenor saxophone,Clark Terry, trumpet;  Hank Jones; piano; Kenny Burrell, guitar; George Duvivier, bass; Jo Jones, drums.

In Stockholm:  Ake Persson, trombone.

In Paris:  Stephane Grappelly, violin; Martial Solal, piano; Roger Guerin, trumpet; Bob Garcia, tenor saxophone.

In London:  Ronnie Ross, baritone saxophone; George Chisholm, trombone; Roy East, alto saxophone.

NP:  One World Jazz, Columbia, WL 162

December 27, 2012  10:13 AM

A New Year begets New Projects: Get off on the right foot

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

In continuing from yesterday (below), we find that most project problems – not all – but most can be avoided, and any others that pop up can be minimized.

In achieving outright avoidance of most problems, any project needs only a few simple things, leveraged at the very outset – (It is imperative that IT managers, directors, and supervisors [such as HelpDesk, for example]) adhere to this – as well as all business-related people. C-class executives are at the very crux of these matters, and they must be fully vested in these principles too. Be sure to have:

A clear definition of business goals and the related solution(s). The more empirical and on-target you can be, the more you can minimize function creep later, and changes in scope. Adding functions, and widening the scope of the project later has catastrophic affects on your budget and, it bears mentioning, the working relationships of all involved. Do your due diligence in spec’ing the project at the outset – who and what does it serve? ID the elements of business, the departments, people, processes, products, services, customers, compliancies to regulatory authorities – everything.

Identification of valid approving authorities for all stages and deliveries, as well as ID’d authorities for supports such as budget, personnel, sanctioned changes where necessary.

Have a solid system for approving and tracking changes. This can be a shelf-solution, or an internal, custom, sophisticated system – but be certain to have something in place. Systems vary in sophistication, but I’ve seen many small orgs with tiny budgets do some pretty weighty projects using spreadsheets. The important thing is to adhere to solid communications, early identification of problems, and total buy-in from everyone on changes. That means approving authorities, all involved business and IT folks, and those directly implementing the adjustments and changes.

Manage risk very carefully. Remember: In the realm of risk, unmanaged possibilities become probabilities. If you’re worried any particular bad thing can happen, don’t risk its manifestation – discuss it at the project meeting table, and alert stakeholders and sponsors where necessary.

Again, due diligence up front is leveraged and makes for smooth projects – define goals and objectives and you’ll be fine. Remember too that, whether you’re a certified project manager or someone just piloting because you’re in the chair, it’s best to practice on some smaller-scale projects before tackling big ones. Before your first core, mission-critical, upgrade – start with something a little more limited in scope: A new HelpDesk ticketing software, for example. Pilot a project to update Windows, or MS-Office, or the like.

December 26, 2012  2:46 PM

A New Year begets New Projects: Common mistakes and avoidance

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

Upon entering any project and its allied management, whether you’re the titular project manager, or one of the subordinate leaders of sub-elements of the project, or a member of the  project staff, or a business player, you need to recognize common mistakes so as to avoid them.  Watch for:

Poor identification of the critical pathKnow where you are, where you’re going, and how to get there.  Seems simple enough; but simple isn’t the same as easy.  In knowing where you are, get all of the necessary resources clearly identified and committed:  Personnel; budget; clear identification of goals – with direct tethers to stakeholders and responsible parties.

Poorly crafted and overlooked milestones:  Be certain to have a realistic hierarchy of goals and deliveries identified.  Once identified, define them well, to include having them in the right order; for example, if a part of the project requires more bandwidth, and another element is a bandwidth upgrade – get the chronology right and do it in the right order.

Lack of Comprehensive Stakeholder Involvement:  Many projects go awry due to a failure to get executive buy-in.  Particularly for IT personnel, determine:

Who are the stakeholders that will “play fair”?  Recognize your strengths, and conversely:  Who has a vested interest in old systems, and who might therefore engage in foot-dragging, or a begrudging engagement?  Are there departments, and therefore players, who might be vested in protectionism and jealousy?  Are any departments “silo’d” that might feel an “outside” project is impinging on their judgments and latitude?

Particularly for projects that bridge “sister-and-brother” agencies, companies, partners, etc., this can be of concern.  Be certain to document “buy-ins” and all agreements – no matter how informal some promises seem to be.  Handshakes and smiles are good – but get it on paper where possible.  Remember:  The most peril can lie outside the legally specified and documented realms.

Broken Communication and Hobbled Collaboration:  Many projects suffer from poor communication, both formal and informal.  In the case of the former, project meetings rely too much on “feel good” accommodations and agreements that are not tied to empiricals, and which are then poorly documented, or not documented at all.  Empirical measures, tied directly to concrete milestones, themselves fully-sanctioned with strong sponsors, are essential.

So, always determine who is doing what, and who has agreed to and sponsored those whats.  Speak directly and accurately in meetings.  Make sure that all accommodations, adjustments,  and agreements are fully understood.  Be certain that adjustments and course-corrections do not violate larger project principles (principles in service to the “local”, specific, project – and that also do not violate basic project management practices).  Anything having dire effect must go to negotiation involving business stakeholders, budget authorities, and so on.  Adjustments to timelines, whether involving interim milestones or ultimate go-live, must certainly get on the table as soon as they look to be manifesting, for early involvement of business’ attention, and a leveraged attention for best adjustments and outcomes.  Don’t try to hide anything.

We’ll continue and finish with some final cautions in our next article.

December 26, 2012  12:41 PM

A New Year begets New Projects

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

Ready or not, here comes 2013. And… most organizations have critical projects already underway, or planned initiatives for the upcoming new year.

Any new year usually inspires people to forgive, to vow not to repeat past mistakes, and to look forward with optimism and renewed vigor. But in the world of business and one of its most critical supports – Information Technology – avoiding past mistakes, looking forward with optimism, necessitates more than wishful thinking and a forgiving nature.

In a world where, by many estimates, about 25% of projects are cancelled before completion (in order to completely re-define and re-launch), we can see that we need some empirical resolutions to ensure best success. Because, we must further realize that of the projects that are maneuvered to a “successful” outcome, 49% suffer budget overruns. That is not sound business!

Also, 41% fail to deliver the expected ROI and general business value. 47% have higher than expected maintenance costs. And amazingly, 62% fail to meet their anticipated schedules, to include milestones and ultimate go-live dates.

So what is the main problem? According to c|net News, “There exists a disconnect between the IT department and the business owners who sponsor IT projects. The two often have very different ideas as to what they want.” But how can it be that IT “wants” something different than Business? The business-half is in charge. IT suggests and (hopefully) brings about the best supports, given the business goals and available supports that the marketplace offers – but IT reports to business – even in a tech company.

Here, we’re defining “business” as those leaders and stakeholders who are not IT: In other words, our discussion applies not just to private business, but to public sector endeavors such as government agencies and departments, non/not-for-profits, and even sole proprietors; they too suffer the divide between effective business, and effective business-enablements.

So, business must take the lead: Business must be qualified to discuss its own requirements, priorities, and available resources (personnel, budget, time).

Business must qualify , as a stakeholder, in understanding the technology it owns, uses, and progresses – in not only effecting the best business outcomes and solutions/service to others, but in matters of business survival. Not too many wrong turns can be sustained.

Next: We’ll look at the most common mistakes, with advice on how to avoid them.

December 24, 2012  1:39 PM

Small Business: Time for an App?

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

Small businesses manage their budgets and overhead very carefully – they have to.  Investments must represent true investment – with direct payoffs in the form of strong ROI; a carefully managed Total-Cost-of-Overhead (TCO); and it helps to have an efficient Time-to-Value (TtV) – that is, the sooner something can start contributing and delivering to the bottom line, the better.

We want quick returns on our investments, and we want to maximize profit by keeping overhead low even as we invest in, and implement, those things that drive revenue.  And so, in the face of an ongoing mobile revolution, any business has to ask itself:  Should we have an app?

Regardless whether any small business sees the need for an app now, or later, it is wise to have a mobile strategy.  Stay current with what is available and what it may do for you now, or in time.  A good start is to simply optimize your website for mobile.

“Mobilizing” your website

Engaging a provider to build a mobile-friendly website is quite inexpensive.  Most sites today utilize a Cascading Style Sheet-based design (CSS).  If you’re not on a CSS protocol, you need to get there in order to be positioned effectively for the future anyway, and that is going to cost a bit.  Assuming you’re utilizing CSS, optimizing your site for mobile isn’t difficult, or expensive.  Many web hosts will even provide a free basic mobile site.  However, for a polished look, best operations, and best certainty, you’ll want to partner with a strong mobile solutions provider.  It’s a good relationship to get underway in any case.

Advantage of Mobile Site over App and Vice-Versa

In terms of compatibility, mobile sites work universally, independent of device, and generally independent of browser.  Score an advantage for the mobile site.  However, recognize that a mobile user must open the browser, and negotiate to the URL, or to the Favorite, or Bookmark…

Apps, on the other hand, can be anchored right on the device’s desktop.  And, apps can be customized to do anything, whereas mobile sites are merely replications of regular site, or even slightly diminished versions.  Apps can provider reminders, can notify of new products and services, can be customized to tie into other apps, and so forth.  It’s important to recognize that each app will need to be created for each platform you intend it for, whether Android, iPhone, or Blackberry.

Apps can also be “inside-facing” – that is, they are not customer-oriented, but rather they help your inside people and processes.  Inventorying, for example.  Dispatching, as another.


An app for your organization can cost anywhere from thousands, to tens of thousand, to hundreds of thousands of dollars – depending on the size and scope of your business and related desires.  A good place to start is with an initial, high-level, conversation with a mobile applications solutions provider – that much is free.  They can help you to decide where the advantages lie:  site vs. app, and the robustness of each, and where the paybacks are.

I’d like to wish all readers of this blog and all staff at TechTarget:  Happy Holidays!

December 21, 2012  12:24 PM

Modern Security Awareness

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

A national newscaster revealed something this past Sunday that is quite extraordinary, given the times we live in. He said, approximately*, the following on a news broadcast: (* details have been disguised)

“I’d just like to say that tomorrow is my brother’s birthday. Lieutenant Colonel John Smith, of Oshkosh, Maryland is 50 years old.”

It’s interesting to note that we have a fair amount of info for piecing together… identity theft:

Date of Birth
City and State

If you think this is being a little paranoid, remember this saying: Just because you’re paranoid, it doesn’t mean no one is out to get you. The real trouble here is the efficiency involved. It’s one thing to mention this information to a small group of people – perhaps some of whom you don’t know well. It’s quite another to divulge this information nationally, to millions of people (and that is this particular show’s audience numbers).

With a little diligence, an identity thief can cruise past this person’s mailbox, and steal even more critical identifying information. As a start, the info above is enough of a foundation to make that cruise a good investment in time. Also, “spoofing” then becomes more easily leveraged; the contact of this person, either via e-mail, USPS mail, or even in person.  One example is a spoof whereby someone poses as the representative of a veteran’s organization, and asks to “verify” information:

“Hello Colonel Smith, we have your city and state as Oshkosh, Maryland – is that correct?  Thank you.  We also have your date of birth as 12/16/62 – is that correct?  Would you please provide your Social Security Number for verification?  Thank you Sir.”  You get the idea.  It happens quite frequently.

The newscaster could have said, merely, “I’d like to wish my brother a Happy Birthday… tomorrow is his birthday” – and left it at that. However, if it were me, I would say nothing. In the first place, a national news audience doesn’t particularly care, and while the mention “on air” might please his brother, it’s really not worth it. It’s not that big a deal in personal terms – being that it’s likely that a phone call will be made (or can be made, in lieu of the on air greeting) later.

It’s time to think very carefully about what you do: What you reveal; to whom; where; and when (are others nearby who can overhear? Online – are systems truly secure?).

In divulging personal information, regardless of the reason, always ask yourself:  Is this something that I have to provide? If it is truly necessary, is this the superior way to do it?

What this newscaster did is fine… for the ‘50s, ‘60s, ‘70s… etc. – maybe. But in today’s times?

NO. WAY.  Be careful out there.

December 17, 2012  5:07 PM

CrowdFunding: Conceive it… Fund it… LAUNCH IT

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

Ever had a great idea, but thought:  Ah, I don’t have the capital to get this off the ground… and probably never will…  and who’s going to want to invest with an unknown like me, anyway?

Or perhaps you’ve wanted to be an investor yourself:  Getting in early, when the gettin’s good.  A relatively small investment, with big payouts to come once a company or idea really takes off.

But again, perhaps you’ve lacked what you considered to be the necessary capital.

Well, the opportunities for everyday people, investors large and small, are changing due to the phenomenon of crowdfunding.

Crowdfunding of sorts has been around forever.  Whenever groups of people contribute to a common cause – whether a business startup, political campaign, building fund, or a healthcare endeavor for a sick friend or acquaintance, for example – we’re leveraging the strength of numbers (the crowd), in garnering small, but powerful, accumulations of resources.  In many cases, we not only “fund” with money, but also with other resources:  Time; attention; focus; and work.

However, with today’s buzzword branding of “crowdfunding,” we’re speaking of equity-based funding:  contributing to a company’s start, with you the funder, subsequently owning a small piece of that company.

“Funding Portals” provide a rich dynamic whereby potential investors can find and begin partnerships with entrepreneurs – websites and related entities already exist, and more are coming.  However, recognize that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will be regulating these portals, as well as activity within crowdfunding – in protection to both investor and startups.  Much of the legislation is contained in the JOBS Act (Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act), of April 2012.  However, also recognize that the area of crowdfunding is in a relative flux, and due diligence in this area will remain challenging as further legislation and changes manifest themselves.

When considering crowdfunding, whether as pitchman/woman or potential investor, recognize that crowdfunding is undertaken for more than equity.  You may see a startup idea that is poised to deliver something to market that you’ve been waiting for, or just have a vested interest in, by virtue of the fact that you’ll use it to good advantage:  “Why hasn’t someone invented a way to _______?”  “Why can’t someone invent something that _________?”  Now you can help bring a certain something to market, and capture its best use to your own advantage – whether for personal pursuits or as a business lever.

Crowdfunding is a great way to uncover ideas that, ‘till now, may have been hidden.  Consider:  The Wright Brothers invented the airplane by virtue of their knowledge, intelligence, and perseverance – same for Edison and his light bulb and myriad other inventions; but they also had the means, and the time.  How many people, 50 years prior, 100 years prior, had valid ideas, of all sorts, but lacked the resources to develop them?  How many sparks of ideas self-extinguished because the intelligent people behind them spent their days tied to more mundane work – perhaps plowing a field all day in bringing food to their family’s table – unable to climb into a position to devote time to development… and delivery?

Given the leverage of today’s social media, and funding portals, we can say:

Get ready for a big change…

December 8, 2012  12:45 PM

The Death of Empiricism?

David Scott David Scott Profile: David Scott

I’ve been known to say that we’re in real trouble as a society when banks start failing the routine task of maintaining simple balances.  Simple balances such as those associated with Checking and Savings accounts.  It will be a sign.  (Maybe some of you will report that we’re already there – I’d be interested in any stories).

Recent events, such as this one *, leave me wondering if we’re not very close to a failure of banks to do simple accounting – an accounting for whether an account is open or not; whether it is active or not.  And now, another recent event does not lend confidence – rather, I see the value of empirical measures, and associated discipline, being discounted…

This most recent event certainly touches on both business and IT, and I’d like to relay it here.  

Back in July, my area suffered a very severe storm.  It was nothing on the scale of Sandy, but my neighbors and I were without power for 7 days – many other folks went without for 10 days or more.  I live near a state park, and was able to use the facilities there for showers.  Toward the end of the week, I realized I’d need to wash clothes very soon.  I surveyed the park’s Laundromat, and saw that I’d need quarters for the washers and dryers.

I procured a $10 roll of quarters from my bank.  However, that very day, my power was restored.  The roll remained unopened in the console of my car for these past months.  A couple weeks ago, I opened the roll… and to my surprise, found a nickel in the middle!  My $10 bill had been turned into $9.80.

Not a big deal to some, and the missing 20 cents was nary a concern to me.  But consider what this means…   A major bank dispensed $9.80 for $10 in what was supposed to be a transaction of equal values on each side.  If a bank cannot execute its primary duty, in safeguarding and accounting for money, then is it a “bank” at all?  In other words, if anyone banks $10, and desires to withdraw $10… then $10 is due; no other amount represents true banking.

But the really interesting part involves my conversation with one of the managers there.  I told her about finding the nickel in the roll.  We laughed over it, and she offered to reimburse me the 20 cents.  I say “no,” she only had my word for it – but asked how the error could have happened.  She replied that the bank only examines rolls at each end, for the appropriate coin (in view).  I asked how they knew whether there wasn’t a bar of lead in there, or something else lending weight, with coins on each end.  She said that there are rolls the bank packs themselves, but additinoally, the bank takes rolls of coins from customers – but they must be customers who have accounts at that branch, and they must initial the rolls they tender for paper money.  The bank also gets rolls of coins from other banks – in these cases, she said, those rolls are stamped – essentially branded to indicate the bank from which the roll came. 

I asked her if she wanted the initials/or bank stamp that was on my roll – it was intact in the car.  She said “no.”

When I returned to my car, I examined the torn roll – all of the paper is there (as pictured), but I found no initials, nor did I find a stamp.  My bank was either being disingenuous with me, or worse, their standards have slipped… or no longer exist.

Again, on the surface this appears to be a small thing.  But, the more you think about it… 

Any thoughts?


*  I am still receiving statements from Capital One – after a three year absence – but now indicating a balance of negative $6.99.  In other words; they owe me money.  Think I’ll collect the same exhorbitant interest they charge us?  It’s the Zombie account that won’t die.

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: