Enterprise IT Watch Blog

Jun 13 2018   1:58PM GMT

Waiting for blockchain hype to subside and data platform incumbents to play their hands

Michael Tidmarsh Michael Tidmarsh Profile: Michael Tidmarsh

Tags:
Blockchain


Data image via FreeImages

By James Kobielus (@jameskobielus)

Blockchain isn’t snake oil, but it’s not exactly the panacea that we’re being led to believe.

Yes, many promising technologies got through this hype phase before mass adoption, but the blockchain mania seems to lack the center of gravity that old-timers like me used to call a “killer app.” In enterprise IT, there’s not even any consensus about where blockchain should sit in the stack of promising projects to explore. By some accounts, blockchain is gaining momentum among IT practitioners. But other observers have surveyed enterprise IT executives and found precious little enthusiasm for the technology.

No one doubts that blockchain has use cases for which it’s ideally suited and will be commercialized successfully. But if anybody’s making serious money from this open-source technology right now, it’s the hypesters. I couldn’t help noticing when the roguish John McAfee added blockchain hype to his revenue model. This recent interview revealed that he now charges $105,000 per tweet to promote different cryptocurrencies and has advised or worked with well over dozen startups in this space.

That’s why I couldn’t help laughing as I sifted through one outlandish McAfee assertion after another, such as:

  • “Every field of life is being enhanced, bettered, made cleaner, safer, more convenient and cheaper with cryptocurrency and the blockchain.”
  • “In five years, there will be nothing that’s not on the blockchain.”
  • “The people who understand there is no boss, central authority or central design will be making hundreds of millions of dollars, and everybody else will fail.”
  • “With the blockchain, you don’t have an idea. You simply get the people together and see what comes out.”

With that last statement, I felt like I was going to pass out, seeing as how McAfee seems to be advising us to switch off our critical minds when blockchain enters the conversation. This is the kind of exhortation where a tech evangelist starts to sound like a cult leader who wants our money along with our unquestioning devotion to the sacred cause. This collectivist “you simply get people together” tenet seems to be yet another page out of the crusading evangelists textbook. And the promise of one clique getting super-rich while “everybody else will fail” sums up the blockchain true believer’s saved-or-damned outlook very nicely.

It will be good in a few years’ time when blockchain mania is ancient history and we learn where this technology ends up in the current pantheon of next big things, including artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, intelligent robotics, augmented programming, edge computing. Wikibon finds a lot of innovation taking place in the intersections between blockchain and these emerging technologies, as well as in such established enterprise infrastructure as industrial IoT and identity management.

Regarding blockchain’s commercialization, I doubt that the getting-rich will be as speedy as McAfee wants to believe, due in parat to the very collectivism he calls out as necessary to the technology’s deployment.

It’s highly doubtful that greenfield blockchains will just waltz into existing industries and rapidly disrupt existing B2B practices to the advantage of some new class of competitors. If this scenario is realistic, then why, in the almost 10 years since blockchain sprang forth from the bowels of Bitcoin, have we seen no one seize this opportunity to disrupt market after market and get filthy rich in the process?

In a recent article, Deloitte discussed the pivotal role of B2B collectives and their stakeholders in building successful blockchains. “Generating the greatest value from blockchain will require organizations to collaborate with competitors, regulatory bodies, form or join consortia and partner with startups. For many organizations, this level of collaboration requires organizations to adopt new ways of working, both internally and externally….Standardisation will enable enterprises to share blockchain solutions more easily and collaborate on their development. CIOs can start to set the standards for this. For example, by working with external developer ecosystems, teams can begin to exchange ideas and key learnings with like-minded organizations…Data management and process standards already exist in many organizations and these same standards can be applied to blockchain.”

One factor slowing enterprise embrace of blockchain is the chicken-and-egg difficulty of finding tech personnel who have operational experience with the technology. As Gartner said in a recent study, “The challenge for CIOs is not just finding and retaining qualified engineers, but finding enough to accommodate growth in resources as blockchain developments grow. Qualified engineers may be cautious due to the historically libertarian and maverick nature of the blockchain developer community.”

Clearly, McAfee is one of many blockchain evangelists who are targeting that “libertarian and maverick” element with their breathless pitches. One might more accurately call it a “gold-rush mentality,” with that analogy an almost-perfect fit for a mania that’s sustained by waves of “miners” panning their “stakes” for a new “coin” that may turn out to be, for the most part, fool’s gold.

Ironically, another key libertarian cause—privacy protection—may also throw a wrench into adoption of blockchain into the business world. As I noted recently, the new General Data Protection Regulation  (GDPR) is making it very difficult to justify deploying blockchain’s “immutable distributed hyperledger” into any application that manages the personally identifiable information (PII) of European Union citizens. The sticking point is that blockchain’s unchangeable historical record conflicts with GDPR’s guarantee of a “right to be forgotten”—in other words, to request that your PII be permanently deleted from any database—including blockchains—in which it’s been persisted.

Even if blockchain’s money train is able to exploit lucrative opportunities that don’t conflict with GDPR and similar laws elsewhere, it may be derailed in the long run by the laws of capitalism. As it was with the hopefuls who flocked to northern California in the 19th century, the real money to be made from blockchain will accrue to merchants who supply the tools of the trade.

In that regard, we’re already seeing who those blockchain beneficiaries will likely be, and, no surprise, it’s the incumbent IT vendors. Wikibon has been seeing an acceleration in blockchain-related platform and tooling announcements from established enterprise IT solution providers, with a consistent emphasis on making this technology play well in enterprise cloud data infrastructures:

  • Amazon Web Services recently launched new preset templates for rapid creation, deployment and securing blockchains in the AWS cloud. Accessible through this get-started page, these templates make it easier for developers to create blockchains on either of two blockchain versions: Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric. AWS’s templates create peer-to-peer blockchains in which each participant has access to a shared ledger where the immutable, independently verifiable transactions are recorded. Users can leverage managed, certified AWS CloudFormation templates to automate the deployment of Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric frameworks as well as additional required components. The blockchains may be deployed on Amazon Elastic Container Service or ECS clusters, or directly on an EC2 instance running Docker. Blockchains are created in the user’s own Amazon Virtual Private Cloud, allowing use of their PC subnets and network Access Control Lists. Users of AWS-hosted blockchains can assign granular permissions using AWS Identity and Access Management to restrict which resources an ECS cluster or EC2 instance can access. The blockchain templates are free of additional charge to AWS customers, though they must still pay for the AWS resources needed to run their blockchains on AWS. They can create and deploy blockchain networks in any public AWS region.
  • IBM recently launched its Blockchain Platform, which offers the capability as a software-as-a-service on its public cloud service. As described in this IBM whitepaper, the service runs on the open-source Hyperledger blockchain version from the Linux Foundation. It includes intuitive tooling that helps IBM Cloud subscribers to accelerate development and operationalization of a distributed, scalable and high-performance blockchain. Developers use Integrated Hyperledger Composer to turn business concepts into application code optimized for running on the deployed blockchain. Policy-based governance tools simplify network activation and management tasks across distributed blockchains. IBM Cloud’s always-on operations enable 24×7, no-downtime updates to blockchain applications. IBM provides tools for users to easily migrate from blockchain proofs-of-concept all the way through to production on a secure, high-performance and fully scalable networks in IBM Cloud. IBM provides a visual tool for users to manage blockchain administration and governance, iterative development and basic service levels. Under an Enterprise Plan, IBM Cloud offers a secure environment and advanced service levels for production-grade deployment, application development and testing.
  • Microsoft recently announced the public preview of Azure Blockchain Workbench at its Build conference. Available in the Azure MarketplaceWorkbench is a low-code development tool that enables developers to create, refine and deploy blockchain apps rapidly with minimal coding. The tool provisions an end-to-end blockchain, infrastructure and application on Azure with a few clicks. It integrates the blockchain with all the Azure services needed to build a functioning application. It can associate blockchain identities with federated identity systems through Azure Active Directory for single sign-on, and for simplified identity management throughout a B2B blockchain consortium. It stores secrets and keys securely with Azure Key Vault. It ingests and manages the events required to trigger smart contracts using Service Bus and Event Grid. It synchronizes on-chain data with off-chain storage and databases to query attestations and visualize ledger activity more easily. It leverages Microsoft Flow and Logic Apps to enable easy integration of blockchain workflows with existing systems. And it extends blockchain capabilities with a REST-based API for client development and a message-based API for system-to-system integration.
  • Oracle unveiled its open-source blockchain platform-as-a-service offering last fall at its OpenWorld conference. Oracle Blockchain Cloud Service is a comprehensive cloud platform for building, deploying, integrating, updating, querying, transacting, securing, scaling, administering and monitoring blockchains. The service includes client-side software development kits for enrolling blockchain members, adding peer nodes, creating channels, deploying smart contracts, registering for events, running transactions and querying ledger data using Java and Node.js. It provides REST APIs for integrating with other systems via Oracle Integration Cloud, Oracle Digital Innovation Platform and NetSuite SuiteCloud Platform. Developers can build new blockchain transactional applications in Oracle Java, Application Container, Mobile, Application Builder, Integration or SOA Cloud Services. Provisioning an Oracle blockchain instance spins up a production-ready platform including all required infrastructure services and embedded resources, including compute, containers, storage, identity management and event streaming. Built on Hyperledger Fabric, Oracle’s service takes the features of that open-source platform and adds security, confidential permissions and transactional processing capabilities for building enterprise-grade blockchain applications.

As can be seen from these announcements, vendors of blockchain infrastructure solutions are going to market with approaches that have served them well with established platforms. As I discussed here, these include blockchain platforms as a service, blockchain deployment templates, blockchain domain accelerators, and blockchain ecosystem hubs.

My sense is that the most innovative blockchain startups will emerge from their incumbent-fostered ecosystems, with the most successful players being deeply rooted in established industries. The many technical limitations of blockchain—in terms of performance and scalability for transactional data applications—will keep it from dominating many core enterprise use cases.

The incumbent enterprise data platform vendors will dominate blockchains. They will do so by playing their hands in the area of hybrid clouds, in which blockchains will be one important new data thread in the tapestry but far from the only one.

In other words, there is no blockchain monoculture on the horizon for enterprise data professionals.

 Comment on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: