<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing for Business - our / our&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Foneman1</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Foneman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Just curious to see how many others caught this.
In your explanation, you incorrectly used the phrase "If it was a word..."
Since this is a subjunctive clause. it should read "If it were a word..." ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious to see how many others caught this.<br />
In your explanation, you incorrectly used the phrase &#8220;If it was a word&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Since this is a subjunctive clause. it should read &#8220;If it were a word&#8230;&#8221; <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tpm</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Tpm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Of course they are sure. The word "our" incorporates the possessive, whereas Madonna does not - it's just a name. And of course they're right, "our's" is not a word.
Makes me wonder about what's been happening in American schools over the past few decades; apparently English is no longer taught.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they are sure. The word &#8220;our&#8221; incorporates the possessive, whereas Madonna does not - it&#8217;s just a name. And of course they&#8217;re right, &#8220;our&#8217;s&#8221; is not a word.<br />
Makes me wonder about what&#8217;s been happening in American schools over the past few decades; apparently English is no longer taught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaco</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-our-ours/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>are you sure?   if it were Madonna's,  it would not be 'Madonna is'   it woud indicate it 'belonged' to Madonna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you sure?   if it were Madonna&#8217;s,  it would not be &#8216;Madonna is&#8217;   it woud indicate it &#8216;belonged&#8217; to Madonna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->