<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing for business - neither/nor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-neithernor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-neithernor/</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TPLTX70</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-neithernor/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>TPLTX70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-neithernor/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Technically, none of the three options are correct. When you use a "neither/nor" usage, it's the same as using "each."  Hence, the verb should be "has" and not "have".

Either way, thanks for helping folks improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, none of the three options are correct. When you use a &#8220;neither/nor&#8221; usage, it&#8217;s the same as using &#8220;each.&#8221;  Hence, the verb should be &#8220;has&#8221; and not &#8220;have&#8221;.</p>
<p>Either way, thanks for helping folks improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->