<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing for Business - dived, dove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-dived-dove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-dived-dove/</link>
	<description>A Whatis.com Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ivy Wigmore</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/writing-for-business-dived-dove/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=304#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I have to say I was surprised on this one -- I didn't think "dived" was used anywhere. I've always heard and seen "dove." But I guess that's the British-Canadian standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I was surprised on this one &#8212; I didn&#8217;t think &#8220;dived&#8221; was used anywhere. I&#8217;ve always heard and seen &#8220;dove.&#8221; But I guess that&#8217;s the British-Canadian standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->