 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is correct &#8212; any time or anytime?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/which-is-correct-any-time-or-anytime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/which-is-correct-any-time-or-anytime/</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: IvyWigmore</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/which-is-correct-any-time-or-anytime/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>IvyWigmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=442#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one seems to break down according to location. I&#039;ve seen since that &quot;anytime&quot; is not considered wrong in the US, although it&#039;s still considered incorrect in Britain. 

I came across this post recently and thought I should edit it to reflect that duality. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. :)

DatSplat has a nice entry about this issue: http://www.datsplat.com/grammar-any-time-versus-anytime-one-word-or-two-words/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one seems to break down according to location. I&#8217;ve seen since that &#8220;anytime&#8221; is not considered wrong in the US, although it&#8217;s still considered incorrect in Britain. </p>
<p>I came across this post recently and thought I should edit it to reflect that duality. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>DatSplat has a nice entry about this issue: <a href="http://www.datsplat.com/grammar-any-time-versus-anytime-one-word-or-two-words/" rel="nofollow">http://www.datsplat.com/grammar-any-time-versus-anytime-one-word-or-two-words/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldclassic70</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/which-is-correct-any-time-or-anytime/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldclassic70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=442#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Explanation: Any time is always two words.&quot; is incorrect for this usage.  It is like saying &#039;cannot&#039; can only be spelled &#039;can not&#039;.  

Anytime is a valid word - see http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anytime.  

b. is correct.  For a. to be correct, it must read &quot;at any time&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Explanation: Any time is always two words.&#8221; is incorrect for this usage.  It is like saying &#8216;cannot&#8217; can only be spelled &#8216;can not&#8217;.  </p>
<p>Anytime is a valid word &#8211; see <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anytime" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anytime</a>.  </p>
<p>b. is correct.  For a. to be correct, it must read &#8220;at any time&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
