<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing for Business - A Whatis.com Blog &#187; till or &#8217;til</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/tag/till-or-til/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Till or &#8217;til?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/till-or-til/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/till-or-til/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apostrophes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonly misspelled words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[till or 'til]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/till-or-til/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? Because time is limited, please hold your questions ____ after the robot demonstration. a. till b. &#8217;til Answer: a Explanation: Although till is often considered to be an abbreviation of until &#8212; and is frequently thought to be incorrect for its extra letter l and lack of apostrophe &#8212; it actually predates [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct?</strong><br />
Because time is limited, please hold your questions ____ after the robot demonstration.<br />
a. till<br />
b. &#8217;til</p>
<p><span id="more-809"></span><br />
<strong>Answer:  a</strong></p>
<p><strong>Explanation: </strong><br />
Although <em>till</em> is often considered to be an abbreviation of <em>until</em> &#8212; and is frequently thought to be incorrect for its extra letter<em> l </em>and lack of <em>apostrophe</em> &#8212; it actually predates the longer word.  People who want to use a less formal variant sometimes use &#8217;til, but that&#8217;s not actually a word. Because we&#8217;ve got two perfectly good, equally correct words that mean the same thing, we don&#8217;t need to incorporate another into the language. (Merriam-Webster, I&#8217;m talking to you!)</p>
<p>See more about <em>&#8217;til, till </em>and <em>until </em>on <a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-unt1.htm">World Wide Words</a> and <a href="http://motivatedgrammar.wordpress.com/2007/11/23/til-v-till-v-til-v-until/">motivated grammar.</a></p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/DivineWrite">@divinewrite</a> for the idea for this post. (He, in turn, thanks <a href="http://twitter.com/code_and_prose">@code_and_prose</a> for setting him up with a question.)</p>
<p><img src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/07/logo_twitter.gif" alt="" /> Follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar">Twitter @tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/till-or-til/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
