 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing for Business - A Whatis.com Blog &#187; Principle A violation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/tag/principle-a-violation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>More misadventures with &#8220;myself&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/more-misadventures-with-myself/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/more-misadventures-with-myself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[me/myself/I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal pronouns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Principle A violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflexive pronouns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/more-misadventures-with-myself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On his Literal-Minded blog, Neal Whitman explains more about how reflexive pronouns are used correctly in an embarrassing episode from his past: “Maddie, Ed, Deanna, and Jennifer are riding together,” said Chad. “Michelle will be riding with myself, and …” With myself? I thought. Why was Chad talking in that pompous way? Why didn’t he [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his Literal-Minded blog, <a href="http://literalminded.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/dancing-with-imyself/">Neal Whitman explains more about how reflexive pronouns are used </a>correctly in an embarrassing episode from his past:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Maddie, Ed, Deanna, and Jennifer are riding together,” said Chad. “Michelle will be riding with myself, and …”</p>
<p>With myself? I thought. Why was Chad talking in that pompous way? Why didn’t he just say with me? This kind of myself-abuse was one of my grammar peeves.</p>
<p>Syntacticians have a name for what Chad did, but it’s not a very well-chosen name. They call it a Principle A violation. If I had named it, I would have called Principle A the Reflexive Rule. It’s the rule that says that in Standard English (and other languages, too), reflexive pronouns are used when a grammatical object of a verb or preposition refers to someone already mentioned earlier in the same clause&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Whitman goes on to explain how he embarrassed himself (note correct use of reflexive pronoun) &#8212; not by using <em>myself</em> incorrectly but by correcting someone else who had (in, perhaps, less than ideal circumstances for a teachable moment).  Oh, he was correct, grammatically. <a href="http://literalminded.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/dancing-with-imyself/">But were his motives suspect? </a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/more-misadventures-with-myself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
