<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing for Business - A Whatis.com Blog &#187; made-up words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/tag/made-up-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>ingenuous vs. disingenuous</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ingenuous-vs-disingenuous/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ingenuous-vs-disingenuous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonly confused words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[made-up words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=1952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? The media is being __________ when it follows a vendor&#8217;s lead and calls a blatant marketing event a &#8220;news conference.&#8221; a. ingenuous b. disingenuous Answer: b Explanation: Unless we see the press as being naive and easily duped, they&#8217;re disingenuous in this context. In yesterday&#8217;s post, I wrote about ingenious vs. ingenuous [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct?</strong><br />
The media is being __________ when it follows a vendor&#8217;s lead and calls a blatant marketing event a &#8220;news conference.&#8221;<br />
a. ingenuous<br />
b. disingenuous<br />
<span id="more-1952"></span><br />
<strong>Answer: b</strong></p>
<p><strong>Explanation: </strong><br />
Unless we see the press as being naive and easily duped, they&#8217;re disingenuous in this context. </p>
<p>In yesterday&#8217;s post, I wrote about <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ingenuous-or-ingenious-whats-the-difference/"><em>ingenious</em> vs. <em>ingenuous</em></a> and mentioned that a lot of people don&#8217;t seem to realize there are two different words. I came across one mention of a Microsoft Word correction error, in which some typoed version of <em>ingenious</em> is corrected to <em>ingenuous</em>. </p>
<p>One thing I hadn&#8217;t anticipated was that other people seem to use <em>ingenuous</em> when they mean <em>disingenuous</em>. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the first definition of ingenuous that pops up in a Google search:</p>
<p>in·gen·u·ous/inˈjenyo͞oəs/<br />
Adjective:<br />
(of a person or action) Innocent and unsuspecting.<br />
Synonyms:<br />
artless &#8211; naive &#8211; candid &#8211; frank &#8211; simple &#8211; guileless</p>
<p>Someone is disingenuous if they are insincere but pretend to have those qualities. I suspect the use of ingenuous to mean disingenuous comes from thinking the word is linked to genuine, so <em>ingenuous</em> might mean <em>not genuine</em>.</p>
<p>And then there are people throwing <em>ingenuine</em> into the mix. Darren Barefoot, seeking support, <a href="http://www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2007/03/ingenuine-isnt-a-word.html">found 19,100 Google hits</a> for it &#8212; but none in dictionaries. That was in 2007. Let&#8217;s see&#8230; Today we&#8217;re up to 98,800. That means that, although ingenuine is still not a word, it may well be some day. Adding a new category for posts now: Non-words. </p>
<p><img src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/07/logo_twitter.gif" alt="" /> Follow me on <a href="http://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar">Twitter @tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ingenuous-vs-disingenuous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expedite or expediate?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/expedite-or-expediate/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/expedite-or-expediate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[made-up words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transitive verbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use the better choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worthless words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=1685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? To prevent a crippling worm attack, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) urged that all users _______ application of the patch. a. expedite b. expediate Answer: a. Explanation: Expedite is by far the better choice here. Although I hate to have to report this, expediate is gaining acceptance as a word &#8212; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct? </strong></p>
<p>To prevent a crippling <a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/worm">worm</a> attack, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) urged that all users _______ application of the <a href="http://searchenterprisedesktop.techtarget.com/definition/patch">patch</a>.</p>
<p>a. expedite</p>
<p>b. expediate</p>
<p><span id="more-1685"></span></p>
<p><strong>Answer: a.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><strong>Explanation:</strong></strong></p>
<p><em>Expedite</em> is by far the better choice here.</p>
<p>Although I hate to have to report this, <em>expediate</em> is gaining acceptance as a word &#8212; although I&#8217;m happy to report that it&#8217;s not in very many dictionaries. It means <em>expedite, </em>which means to do something promptly or to speed up a process. I expect this is another word created because it was being used. People probably made it up as a verb form of <em>expedient</em>. What next &#8212; <em>expediation</em> instead of <em>expedition</em>? I&#8217;m too scared to look.</p>
<p><em>Expediate</em> comes to me via my husband, who works at an IT firm (which shall remain nameless to prevent me from having drinks tossed in my face at the summer mixer). A coworker used it in a construction similar to the one I used above. The hub&#8217;s workplace is a fruitful source of blog fodder &#8212; his boss inspired the <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/which-is-correct-moot-or-mute/">mute point</a> post.</p>
<p><em>Expediate</em> was featured in the <a href="http://home.comcast.net/~wwftd/">Worthless Word for the Day</a> list.</p>
<p>What horrific grammatical errors are you hearing in the wilds of  IT and business? Let me know!</p>
<p><strong>Follow me on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/tao_of_grammar">@tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/expedite-or-expediate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
