 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing for Business - A Whatis.com Blog &#187; Latin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/tag/latin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:44:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Font of wisdom or fount of wisdom?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/font-of-wisdom-or-fount-of-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/font-of-wisdom-or-fount-of-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[archaic words and phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonly confused words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meanings of common expressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=2611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? Once upon a time, the CIO was considered the ____ of all wisdom, at least in terms of technology. a. fount b. font Answer: Either. Explanation: Fount is short for fountain as a spring flows from the earth; metaphorically, it refers to a continuous source of something or other. A font, in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct?</strong><br />
Once upon a time, the <a href="http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/CIO">CIO</a> was considered the ____ of all wisdom, at least in terms of technology.<br />
<strong>a.</strong> fount<br />
<strong>b.</strong> font</p>
<p><span id="more-2611"></span></p>
<p><strong>Answer: Either.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Explanation:</strong><br />
<em>Fount </em>is short for <em>fountain</em> as a spring flows from the earth; metaphorically, it refers to a continuous source of something or other. A font, in this context, is more of a reservoir, like the baptismal font. So, although the original expression was &#8220;fount of all wisdom,&#8221; either works, depending on whether you consider someone to be an eternal source of wisdom or just a sort of holding tank for it. In either case, we often use &#8220;fount of all wisdom&#8221; sarcastically, implying that they may not be quite as wise as they are deemed to be.</p>
<p>I thought of writing this post because I referred to George Bush as a fount of malapropisms and other errors yesterday in a <a href="https://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar/status/299479737439494144">conversation on Twitter</a> and then wondered about the relationship between the words <em>fount</em> and <em>font</em>.</p>
<p>They both derive from the Latin <em>fons</em> for <em>fountain</em> but came different routes:</p>
<p>From Merriam-Webster:<br />
Fount: Middle English, from Old English, from Late Latin font-, fons, from Latin, fountain<br />
Font: Middle English, from Old English, from Late Latin font-, fons, from Latin, fountain</p>
<p>I&#8217;m inclined toward fount, myself, but as Maeve Maddox wrote in her post <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/fount-of-wisdom/">Fount of Wisdom</a>, &#8220;Do you see the figurative source of wisdom or information as a welling spring of water, or as a filled basin? I’ll stick with fount, but I’d hesitate to fault the speaker/writer who goes with font.&#8221;</p>
<p>Follow me on <a href="http://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar">Twitter @tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/font-of-wisdom-or-fount-of-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Per say what?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/per-say-what/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/per-say-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonly misspelled words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? A serious reportable event is not evidence of negligence ______. a. per say b. perse c. per se Answer: c. Explanation: Per se is a Latin phrase meaning by or in itself. For example, drinking a liter of vodka is not illegal per se but you cannot legally drive a car after [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct?</strong><br />
A <a href="http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/electric-power.html">serious reportable event</a> is not evidence of negligence ______.<br />
a. per say<br />
b. perse<br />
c. per se</p>
<p><span id="more-1129"></span><br />
<strong>Answer: c.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Explanation: </strong><br />
<em>Per se</em> is a Latin phrase meaning <em>by or in itself</em>. For example, drinking a liter of vodka is not illegal <em>per se</em> but you cannot legally drive a car after doing so. And before you try this experiment at home, you should be aware that it could also lead to other ill-advised behaviors.</p>
<p>Online, something like 432,000 people seem to think the term is spelled <em>per say</em>. Other misspellings include <em>perse, perce, persay </em>and <em>persai.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/whatis/latin-phrase-cheatsheets-to-impress-your-friends-and-colleagues/">See our cheat sheet for more handy Latin phrases.</a></p>
<p><img src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/07/logo_twitter.gif" alt="" /> Follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar">Twitter @tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/per-say-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does that augur well or auger well?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/does-that-augur-well-or-auger-well/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/does-that-augur-well-or-auger-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[auger or augur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonly misspelled words]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word meanings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is correct? The CFO said, with a twinkle in her eye, that the client&#8217;s enthusiasm for the straw man proposal ______ well for negotiations. a. augured b. augered Answer: a. Explanation: To augur is to indicate or predict from signs or omens; augury is the practice of doing so. An auger, on the other [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Which is correct?</strong><br />
The <a href="http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/CFO">CFO</a> said, with a twinkle in her eye, that the client&#8217;s enthusiasm for the <a href="http://searchcrm.techtarget.com/definition/strawman">straw man</a> proposal ______ well for negotiations.<br />
a. augured<br />
b. augered</p>
<p><span id="more-1088"></span><br />
<strong>Answer: a.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Explanation: </strong><br />
To augur is to indicate or predict from signs or omens; augury is the practice of doing so. An auger, on the other hand, is a type of device used to drill holes.</p>
<p>In ancient Rome, an augur was a priest who foretold events by interpreting natural phenomena, such as the entrails of sacrificial birds. (I had to hold myself back from saying &#8220;foretold future events&#8221; but, really, what other kind could you foretell?)</p>
<p>There are a couple of theories about where the word came from. One is that it derives from an Old Latin (There&#8217;s my thing learned for today &#8212; there was Old Latin before the Latin that we think of as pretty old itself) word for <em>increase</em> because augury was often used to predict the likelihood of crop increases. (That&#8217;s where the word <em>augment</em> comes from.) The other theory is that augur comes from<em> avi</em> and <em>geros</em>, meaning &#8220;directing the birds.&#8221;</p>
<p>The interesting thing about <em>auger</em> is that it used to be <em>nauger</em> but somehow <em>a nauger </em>was split up incorrectly as <em>an auger</em>. That&#8217;s just one of many entertaining facts in <a href="http://twitter.com/@editormark">@EditorMark&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.markallenediting.com/allen/Twitter_archives.html">Twitter Archive</a>.</p>
<p>The nauger reminds me of a<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/bored-maybe-you-need-a-nobby/"> joke about a nobby</a> in Cathleen Schine&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Three-Weissmanns-Westport-Novel/dp/0374299048/">The Three Weissmans of Westport</a>. Which I think I&#8217;m going to have to post about separately because I&#8217;ve gotten sidetracked enough for one post.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augur">There&#8217;s more information about augurs and augury in the Wikipedia entry.</a></p>
<p><img src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/8/files/2009/07/logo_twitter.gif" alt="" /> Follow us on <a href="http://twitter.com/tao_of_grammar">Twitter @tao_of_grammar</a></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/does-that-augur-well-or-auger-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
