 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ordering adjectives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: LesterSmith</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>LesterSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Stevegs points out, the explanation contradicts the answer. 

The problem, I believe, is in trying to create a &quot;rule&quot; from a &quot;rationale.&quot; Yes, most people would agree that metal is the most critical adjective here; it defines something essential about the devices. The reason &quot;b&quot; seems the better order of &quot;big&quot; and &quot;ugly,&quot; however, has to do with rhythm. It&#039;s poetics. 

Regarding the role of grammar in cases like these, see &quot;[A href=&quot;http://www.upwritepress.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?PostID=103899&amp;A=SearchResult&amp;SearchID=542354&amp;ObjectID=103899&amp;ObjectType=55&quot;]Not Just One but Four Grammars - and Why That&#039;s Good[/A].&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Stevegs points out, the explanation contradicts the answer. </p>
<p>The problem, I believe, is in trying to create a &#8220;rule&#8221; from a &#8220;rationale.&#8221; Yes, most people would agree that metal is the most critical adjective here; it defines something essential about the devices. The reason &#8220;b&#8221; seems the better order of &#8220;big&#8221; and &#8220;ugly,&#8221; however, has to do with rhythm. It&#8217;s poetics. </p>
<p>Regarding the role of grammar in cases like these, see &#8220;[A href="http://www.upwritepress.com/BlogRetrieve.aspx?PostID=103899&amp;A=SearchResult&amp;SearchID=542354&amp;ObjectID=103899&amp;ObjectType=55"]Not Just One but Four Grammars &#8211; and Why That&#8217;s Good[/A].&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevegs</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/ordering-adjectives/#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer given is [B]&#039;b&#039;[/B] but the logic of the reason supports[B] &#039;a&#039;[/B].  if opinion is &#039;last&#039; or furthest from the noun being modified, then the word order should be ugly (opinion), big (size) metal (material) devices.  But the &#039;natural&#039; order which is usual and customary is big (size), ugly (opnion) metal (material) devices.

So something seems out of alignment here.

******
You&#039;re right -- I think I made the assumption that the seeming natural order would be correct. I&#039;m going to have to dig around and see if I can find out some other reason I&#039;m right. ;-)

Thanks for commenting!

Ivy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer given is [B]&#8216;b&#8217;[/B] but the logic of the reason supports[B] &#8216;a&#8217;[/B].  if opinion is &#8216;last&#8217; or furthest from the noun being modified, then the word order should be ugly (opinion), big (size) metal (material) devices.  But the &#8216;natural&#8217; order which is usual and customary is big (size), ugly (opnion) metal (material) devices.</p>
<p>So something seems out of alignment here.</p>
<p>******<br />
You&#8217;re right &#8212; I think I made the assumption that the seeming natural order would be correct. I&#8217;m going to have to dig around and see if I can find out some other reason I&#8217;m right. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p>Ivy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
