 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has lain or has laid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/has-lain-or-has-laid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/has-lain-or-has-laid/</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevegs</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/has-lain-or-has-laid/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/has-lain-or-has-laid/#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the difference in the grids?  They both reference lie - laid is not listed at all.  Is laid not a valid word, then?

*********
Thanks for noticing, Steve -- I botched the tables. I&#039;d inadvertently copied the two tables twice and apparently removed the two &quot;lay&quot; tables instead of one of each. I&#039;ll fix!


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference in the grids?  They both reference lie &#8211; laid is not listed at all.  Is laid not a valid word, then?</p>
<p>*********<br />
Thanks for noticing, Steve &#8212; I botched the tables. I&#8217;d inadvertently copied the two tables twice and apparently removed the two &#8220;lay&#8221; tables instead of one of each. I&#8217;ll fix!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
