 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: biweekly vs. semiweekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/</link>
	<description>Is your grammar as good as your code?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivy Wigmore</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=624#comment-56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment, Steve. 

I could not agree more. And, in fact, I&#039;ve come across numerous scornful references to Merriam-Webster as an example of lowered standards. Nevertheless, they&#039;re a recognized authority so their opinion has some weight. (That doesn&#039;t mean we have to agree with them, though. ;) )

Best,

Ivy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Steve. </p>
<p>I could not agree more. And, in fact, I&#8217;ve come across numerous scornful references to Merriam-Webster as an example of lowered standards. Nevertheless, they&#8217;re a recognized authority so their opinion has some weight. (That doesn&#8217;t mean we have to agree with them, though. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Ivy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meandyou</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Meandyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=624#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that dictionaries are lowering their standards.  I realize that definitions change over time.  However, it seems that dictionaries are altering definitions  faster and faster.  It used to be only &quot;college&quot; dictionaries would have changes to words based on usage (e.g. appendixes) but now it seems that even others are following suit.  I am sure that electronic communication is partly to blame for this continued dumbing down of America.

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that dictionaries are lowering their standards.  I realize that definitions change over time.  However, it seems that dictionaries are altering definitions  faster and faster.  It used to be only &#8220;college&#8221; dictionaries would have changes to words based on usage (e.g. appendixes) but now it seems that even others are following suit.  I am sure that electronic communication is partly to blame for this continued dumbing down of America.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivy Wigmore</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivy Wigmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=624#comment-53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi David -- Thanks for taking the time to inform. How unhelpful of M-W, though! I suspect their decision is based on use. The effect is to make it impossible to know what someone means when they say &quot;biweekly.&quot; 

I&#039;ll edit more info into the post. 

Thanks for commenting!

Ivy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David &#8212; Thanks for taking the time to inform. How unhelpful of M-W, though! I suspect their decision is based on use. The effect is to make it impossible to know what someone means when they say &#8220;biweekly.&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll edit more info into the post. </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting!</p>
<p>Ivy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP2000</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/biweekly-vs-semiweekly/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>DP2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/writing-for-business/?p=624#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ivy,

According to the Merriam-Webster OnLine Dictionary, biweekly can also mean occurring twice a week; therefore, both options are correct.  I agree that option b is the preferred choice but that&#039;s not what you asked.

Regards,
David.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ivy,</p>
<p>According to the Merriam-Webster OnLine Dictionary, biweekly can also mean occurring twice a week; therefore, both options are correct.  I agree that option b is the preferred choice but that&#8217;s not what you asked.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
