When I was a little kid growing up in suburban Poughkeepsie, New York, it was easy to spot the Dads who worked at IBM. They all wore the IBM (I’ve Been Moved) uniform: a dark suit, white shirt, skinny tie and shoes with laces. Loafers of all kind were frowned upon.
IBM celebrates the corporate uniform in a retrospective called “The Way We Wore.”
I was surprised to learn that there really wasn’t a dress code at IBM during the 1960‘s. The uniform was just an example of what my parents would have labeled “peer pressure” when talking about a younger generation.
Going through IBM’s virtual scrapbook got me wondering — what’s the corporate culture of today going to look like to future social historians?
I telecommute and am working right now at my dining room table, still in my pajamas. My husband commutes an hour and 15 minutes each day. His daily uniform is a bright-colored shirt, wild tie, khaki pants and boating shoes. (Jeans on Friday)
Not a dark suit or power bow-tie between us. I know when I do have to go in to the office, it’s pretty eclectic. It got me wondering, IS there a uniform for techies right now? Do people in your workplace still dress like they did in Freshman year — or has business invaded the landscape of your workday and changed the camouflage?
Informal survey: What’s your work uniform?
The Wolfram Demonstrations Project is a free service with over twelve-hundred dynamically interactive examples of math, science, and physics. Levels of complexity range from elementary school level to graduate physics. Each example has code associated with it.
Lovers of Mathematica, a marvelous mathematical modeling application, will recognize Wolfram as the maker of that fine software. Mathematica itself includes thousands of original algorithms, spanning applied uses that range “from simple calculator operations and educational demonstrations to large-scale systems deployment and maximum-power supercomputing.”
Caught in a boring phone meeting? Need a brain refresh between tasks? Create a work of art at jacksonpollock.org. You start with a blank canvas. Go fast for skinny lines, slow for blobs, click to change colors — you’ll figure it out. For a real challenge, try creating something that DOESN’T look like a Jackson Pollock. (Hey, drop us a note if you end up with a Rembrandt!)
Have you been over to search with Ms. Dewey yet? Ms. Dewey is a viral marketing campaign that Microsoft launched in October, 2006. The campaign centers around msdewey.com, which features actress Janina Gavankar playing a character of the same name.
The Web site features an experimental Flash-based interface that houses Windows Live Search, Microsoft’s search engine. Unlike the more minimalist design principles favored by Google or Ask’s search interface, Ms. Dewey uses a dark city skyline with Gavankar placed front and center. She prompts the visitor to search, commenting on keywords entered. When idle, she’ll find other things to do, often using props from behind the desk or making observations that can only be described as snarky.
The site was developed by graphic designers McCann-Erickson and developer EVB, using over 600 video clips. While the results may be no better than those generated on the standard Live Search page, there’s no question that Ms. Dewey is both easier on the eyes and more entertaining than Jeeves ever was.
One of our colleagues, SearchNetworking.com’s Tessa Parmenter, wrote a provocative message to her audience this past week. In it, she commented on a new tool, Netcosm, described by Andrew Hickey in his recent article, “Network Monitoring gets a video game touch.” Here’s what Andrew had to say:
What if monitoring tools got a 3D kick and incorporated slick, video game-like graphics and sound effects to alert IT of problems on the network?
Sounds a bit goofy, but it just might work.
NetQoS, maker of tools like SuperAgent and ReporterAnalyzer, recently announced its latest creation: Netcosm, a 3D graphical representation of the network and the traffic that traverses it. It uses video game-style graphics, resembling something out of the futuristic 1980s movie Tron or early incarnations of popular games like Doom or Quake.
Netcosm, to put it simply, represents the network and the traffic that traverses it with 3-D graphics that look distinctly like those of a video game. While the tool is not yet released, Netcosm can be viewed as an online demo.
Tessa asked some provocative questions in a recent newsletter, which, with her permission, we’ve excerpted below. Please feel free to respond to with your thoughts in letters to the editor or in the comments section of this post. Do you think this is the future of networking and tech support?
Netcosm targets the younger generation of networking pros, those used to the graphics and sound effects of video games — the IT pro gamer.
What does this say to the non-gamer, networking professional? Maybe it won’t matter because the graphics are doing them a service, presenting lots of metrics all at once with quickly comprehensible images. But could this be ostracizing, or even belittling to the more informed and practiced IT pro?
My guess is no, since much of work these days feels, well, much more like work. Laughter seems to have been squeezed out of our daily work lives — no play allowed, no laughter, no games — so why not add a little joie de vivre to our work day? Isn’t this like getting paid to play video games? And isn’t that a gamer’s dream come true?
In a sense…but then what is this saying about our culture? Maybe the boundaries of work and play should not combine. If you go into this program with the mindset that you’re playing a video game, then you might want to rethink things. There are no pauses, no cheat codes, and certainly no extra lives. Once a failsafe has gone down and the bad guys have taken over your network, you’ve compromised corporate data, not just your self-esteem. And the excitement of the graphics might be tempting. Even the best network admin might want to see what happens, just this one time, when something combusts. Though unrealistic, it’s still a thought to consider. The worse things get, the cooler things look.
All in all, though, we can take this for what it is: a great way to illustrate what is going on with your network. Rather than deciphering vague alert messages, this gets the point across immediately. And, because the majority of us are image-oriented, it makes sense to represent these pertinent metrics graphically.
Do you feel differently about this? Is there something you want to add or comment on? Share your thoughts with us at SearchNetworking.com and send your message to: firstname.lastname@example.org.
While you could view our Technorati Profile, you’d find very little there of interest regarding Alex. Of course, we look forward to seeing that change! If you find our posts interesting, funny or useful, we’d love your link.
While this post primarily serves to claim this blog on Technorati, you can also “favorite us” on Technorati:
And, as long as you’re here, we might as well point out that you can subscribe to this blog’s feed using RSS and a feed reader. Just click on the feed icon below and use one of the subscription options provided by Feedburner. Happy surfing!
We’ve long since defined Linux.
We’ve gone on to note the various distributions, including lightweight versions in the skinny Linux family like Feather Linux, Austrumi and even Puppy Linux. These operating systems are often run directly from live distros burned onto CDs or from hot-swappable flash memory-based jump drives.
We’ve also podcasted about portable applications, where we learned how open source applications like Mozilla‘s Firefox Web browser and Thunderbird email client, along with Audacity, OpenOffice and many other apps have been made mobile. Similarly, these applications are run directly from portable storage media or devices. And, like many others, we’re watching how the OLPC’s XO is received and works “in the wild” as it moves from prototype to worldwide distribution.
Now, we’re taking note of the next version of the “portable desktop,” at least as described by Wired’s Monkey Bites blog. Meet “Damn Small Linux,” a distribution of Linux that takes up a mere 50 megabytes of memory. That makes it small enough to fit on most flash drives. Aside from adding even more acronym confusion to the world of computing (given that Damn Small Linux is shortened to “DSL”), DSL is the latest example of how simple experiments using the open source model of development can become robust distributions. In this case, the original concept was to see how many (usable) desktop applications could fit inside of a 50 MB CD, including a functional operating system.
If you’re wondering how many that is, by the way, the current breakdown, according the DSL Web site, includes:
XMMS (MP3, CD Music, and MPEG), FTP client, Dillo Web browser, Netrik Web browser, Firefox, spreadsheet, Sylpheed email, spellcheck (US English), a word processor (Ted), three editors (Beaver, Vim, and Nano [pico clone]), graphics editing and viewing (Xpaint, and xzgv), Xpdf (PDF Viewer), emelFM (file manager), Naim (AIM, ICQ, IRC), VNCviwer, Rdesktop, SSH/SCP server and client, DHCP client, PPP, PPPoE (ADSL), a Web server, calculator, generic and Ghostscript printer support, NFS, Fluxbox and JWM window managers, games, system monitoring apps, a host of command line tools, USB support, PCMCIA support, some wireless support.
Of course, that list could grow over time, but we’re still impressed by the power of community. In fact, it sounds like another example of crowdsourcing to our ears.
If you Google lifecasting, the odds are that you’ll find lifecasting.org at the top of your search results, a site dedicating to “lifecasting artists” who make 3D copies of living human bodies. The current new media hype around Justin.tv, a new always-on videoblog featuring Yale-grad Justin Kan, may just enter an alternate meaning for the term “lifecasting” into the lexicon.
We’ll make sure to add it to our glossary of ‘casts, to cover our bases.
JustinTVGuide, a blog dedicated to tracking the life and times of Justin.tv, describes Justin’s video experiment as “lifecasting,” for instance. Dandelife.com is doing as much as anyone to support this version of the term. In the info section of Dandelife, for instance. you’ll find a definition for lifecast. We prefer this, slightly amended vesion:
A lifecast is a publicly available streaming video netcast of an individual’s life.
Dandelife itself is a interesting discovery, tracking the progress of various “dandelives” in graphically-rich timelines shared online. Craig Mathias, by the way, thinks Justin.tv may be the future of wireless.
Regardless of what you think of Justin’s programming choices (his life, more or less, which may or may not be your cup of tea) the delivery method, Sprint’s 3G EV-DO wireless telephony network, is certainly worth noting. Given that 3G is a reality in many major metropolitan areas already, you may see many more “Justins” lifecasting around your neighborhood soon.
You’ll certainly see them on the blogosphere, as noted by Wired’s Epicenter blog. According to Adario Strange:
Desktop search itself is nothing new either, of course. Google Desktop has, in its Windows incarnation, been the subject of both security concerns and accusations of spyware.
In fact, recent patch vulnerabilities and a generalized need to lock or secure Google Desktop (read expert Matt Schwartz’s tips on how to tame Google Desktop, if you’re curious) have left enterprise and individual users somewhat cautious about inviting the desktop search engine (DSE) onto their hard drives.
We can’t whole-heartedly recommend it because of these concerns, though the end user experience of many of our geeky early-adopting friends has been positive.
Now, Mac users have the same choice, though as most will immediately protest, OS X’s fourth generation (10.4, aka Tiger) has long had such an engine already built-in, appropriately named Spotlight.
We’ll leave it to you to compare the two, though the Unoffical Apple Weblog (TUAW) has done if for you in this excellent review of Google Desktop for Mac that contrasts the feature sets of the two engines.
If you use other Google apps on your Mac, notably Gmail, Google Desktop may be worth your time. ArsTechnica‘s Jacqui Cheng offers a generally positive hands-on review of Google Desktop for Mac as well.