 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Enterprise Desktop &#187; Windows Vista SP2 RC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/tag/windows-vista-sp2-rc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bitten by the &#8220;Eval&#8221; nature of Vista SP2 RC?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading from Windows Vista SP2 RC to final release version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC expiration date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 release candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my frenzy to test and evaluate Vista SP2 for stability I built myself a test system around the slipstreamed version of Vista x64 SP2 RC available from MSDN for download to subscribers. And while my results were overall positive&#8211;FWIW, SP2 seems to add significantly to Vista stability and uptime&#8211;it appears that I&#8217;m now faced [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my frenzy to test and evaluate Vista SP2 for stability I built myself a test system around the slipstreamed version of Vista x64 SP2 RC available from MSDN for download to subscribers. And while my results were overall positive&#8211;FWIW, SP2 seems to add significantly to Vista stability and uptime&#8211;it appears that I&#8217;m now faced with a painful dilemma about when to scrub the machine and rebuild with the just-released production version.</p>
<p>So, off I go to find the expiration date for the RC. It turns out that whenever one exists, it appears in the &#8220;About Windows&#8221; information for any Windows release. I scratch my head a bit to figure out how to do this, then run <span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Courier">winver</span> at the command line: it does the trick nicely.</p>
<div id="attachment_286" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 439px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/05/winver.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-286" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/05/winver.jpg" alt="The fine print says I have until 4/1/2010 to replace this OS." width="429" height="423" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The fine print says I have until 4/1/2010 to replace this OS.</p></div>
<p>Upon seeing the details, I heave a sigh of relief for numerous reasons. First, there&#8217;s no compelling reason to act soon, with just under 11 months to go before this OS turns into a pumpkin. Second, there&#8217;s every hope that the commercial release of Windows 7 will be out before that date (and I may even be able to perform an in-place upgrade to x64 Windows 7 Professional from this version if the stars smile on me). Third, this being a test machine after all, circumstances (read: new work) may compel me to rebuild this machine for any number of reasons well before the expiration date arrives.</p>
<p>All this said, however, there is a moral to this story: When MS says you shouldn&#8217;t install an RC version on  production gear, they&#8217;re not kidding around. You do have to be willing to bite the bullet sometime after installing one of these versions, and replace the install with something else (that is, a so-called &#8220;clean install&#8221; that wipes out all the work involved in setting up the machine with the RC and its accoutrement) in its stead. I&#8217;m glad that my primary work on this machine consists of building various VMs to use for testing inside Virtual PC 2007. Presumably I need only copy those constituent files to a backup drive, rebuild the underlying system, then replace them in the &#8220;My Virtual Machines&#8221; folder to keep on using them no matter which version or kind of host OS is running to support them. More on this later, I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista SP2 RC Now Available for Download</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-now-available-for-download/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-now-available-for-download/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise Vista desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 release candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit the Microsoft Download Center today (March 4, 2009) and you&#8217;ll see numerous Windows Server 2008/Windows Vista SP2 downloads available there, all of which posted on 3/3/2009. When I visited the page in the morning, here&#8217;s what shows up under the New Downloads heading there: Careful inspection of these listings, however, reveals that all of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visit the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/default.aspx">Microsoft Download Center</a> today (March 4, 2009) and you&#8217;ll see numerous Windows Server 2008/Windows Vista SP2 downloads available there, all of which posted on 3/3/2009. When I visited the page in the morning, here&#8217;s what shows up under the New Downloads heading there:</p>
<div id="attachment_167" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 412px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/03/rc2-newdownloads-090304.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-167" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/03/rc2-newdownloads-090304.jpg" alt="Today's New Downloads are all about the SP2 RC" width="402" height="187" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Today&#39;s downloads are all about SP2 RC</p></div>
<p>Careful inspection of these listings, however, reveals that all of them still include the word &#8220;Beta,&#8221; even though all are indeed new files that posted yesterday. Only the DVD ISO includes a filename that specifically mentions RC2&#8211;namely, <span style="font-family: Courier New,monospace">6002.16670.090130-1715_iso_update_sp_wave0-RCSP2.0_DVD.iso</span>.</p>
<p>Other downloads simply reference their associated KB articles by number, as with the IA64-based offering that appears at the top of the listing shown in the preceding screenshot&#8211;namely, <span style="font-family: Courier New,monospace">Windows6.0-<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/948465">KB948465</a>-IA64.exe</span>. Here again, these articles specifically reference the SP2 beta releases, and make no mention of the Release Candidate itself.</p>
<p>This leads me to a couple of contemplative musings:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you want to see what&#8217;s in RC2, you&#8217;ll want to download and inspect the DVD ISO download</li>
<li>Microsoft will probably either be issuing a clarification soon, or will replace those other downloads with RC2-labeled materials and KB articles</li>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;re all going to have to stay tuned to see what happens next. Very interesting! As for myself, I&#8217;m downloading the ISO image right now, and will use Daemon Tools to see what&#8217;s inside as soon as the download finishes (in 28 more minutes according to the download manager).</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-now-available-for-download/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista SP2 RC On Its Way</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-on-its-way/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-on-its-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 release candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, February 25, Brandon LeBlanc, Windows Communications Manager for the Windows Client Communications Team, posted information to The Windows Blog to announce the Release Candidate (RC) for &#8220;Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.&#8221; Otherwise known as SP2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, this update is still in beta, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, February 25, Brandon LeBlanc, Windows Communications Manager for the Windows Client Communications Team, <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2009/02/25/announcing-the-service-pack-2-for-windows-vista-and-windows-server-2008-rc.aspx">posted information</a> to The Windows Blog to announce the Release Candidate (RC) for &#8220;Service Pack 2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008.&#8221; Otherwise known as SP2 for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, this update is still in beta, but is now available to TechNet and MSDN subscribers for broad access and testing.</p>
<p>Important details of the RC version&#8217;s contents (and those planned for release when SP2 goes live later this year, probably in April) are spelled out in LeBlanc&#8217;s same-day posting entitled &#8220;<a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windowsvista/pages/notable-changes-in-sp2-rc-for-windows-vista-and-windows-server-2008.aspx">Notable Changes in SP2 RC for Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008</a>.&#8221; There&#8217;s also a TEchNet (dated 2/26/2009) document on SP2 available entitled &#8220;<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335033.aspx">Hotfixes and Security Updates in Windows Server SP2 and Windows Vista SP2</a>&#8221; as well. It&#8217;s probably worth a taking a look at these documents, but here&#8217;s my take on some highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>As I mentioned in my previous blog, SP1 remains a mandatory pre-requisite for the install of SP2</li>
<li>Users who wish to update to SP2 using Windows Update or Windows Software/Server Update Services (WSUS) have to patch the servicing stack to automate the SP2 install (see KB 955430 for details; the typical URL http://support.microsoft.com/kb/955430 is not yet working as I write this, however).</li>
<li>Download sizes run fom 300 to 622 MB for standalone packages, and from 41-90 MB for Windows Update users (DVD info not yet available).</li>
<li>Lots of interesting changes to setup and deployment, including a single installer for both Vista and Windows Server 2008, incompatible driver checks, improved error handling and messages, better logging, more secure installation, and post-release installer serviceability. As with SP1, there will also be an SP2 cleanup tool (Compcln.exe) to remove pre-SP2 files from machines, or to reduce the size of slipstream images used to install Vista and/or Windows Server 2008.</li>
</ul>
<p>Anybody who&#8217;s interested who also has a TechNet or MSDN subscription can now sally forth and grab this beta. Because most enterprise admins have one or the other, if not both, this means you!</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/vista-sp2-rc-on-its-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
