 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Enterprise Desktop &#187; Windows Vista SP2 RC expiration date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/tag/windows-vista-sp2-rc-expiration-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Bitten by the &#8220;Eval&#8221; nature of Vista SP2 RC?</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrading from Windows Vista SP2 RC to final release version]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 RC expiration date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista SP2 release candidate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my frenzy to test and evaluate Vista SP2 for stability I built myself a test system around the slipstreamed version of Vista x64 SP2 RC available from MSDN for download to subscribers. And while my results were overall positive&#8211;FWIW, SP2 seems to add significantly to Vista stability and uptime&#8211;it appears that I&#8217;m now faced [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my frenzy to test and evaluate Vista SP2 for stability I built myself a test system around the slipstreamed version of Vista x64 SP2 RC available from MSDN for download to subscribers. And while my results were overall positive&#8211;FWIW, SP2 seems to add significantly to Vista stability and uptime&#8211;it appears that I&#8217;m now faced with a painful dilemma about when to scrub the machine and rebuild with the just-released production version.</p>
<p>So, off I go to find the expiration date for the RC. It turns out that whenever one exists, it appears in the &#8220;About Windows&#8221; information for any Windows release. I scratch my head a bit to figure out how to do this, then run <span style="font-size: 12pt;font-family: Courier">winver</span> at the command line: it does the trick nicely.</p>
<div id="attachment_286" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 439px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/05/winver.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-286" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2009/05/winver.jpg" alt="The fine print says I have until 4/1/2010 to replace this OS." width="429" height="423" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The fine print says I have until 4/1/2010 to replace this OS.</p></div>
<p>Upon seeing the details, I heave a sigh of relief for numerous reasons. First, there&#8217;s no compelling reason to act soon, with just under 11 months to go before this OS turns into a pumpkin. Second, there&#8217;s every hope that the commercial release of Windows 7 will be out before that date (and I may even be able to perform an in-place upgrade to x64 Windows 7 Professional from this version if the stars smile on me). Third, this being a test machine after all, circumstances (read: new work) may compel me to rebuild this machine for any number of reasons well before the expiration date arrives.</p>
<p>All this said, however, there is a moral to this story: When MS says you shouldn&#8217;t install an RC version on  production gear, they&#8217;re not kidding around. You do have to be willing to bite the bullet sometime after installing one of these versions, and replace the install with something else (that is, a so-called &#8220;clean install&#8221; that wipes out all the work involved in setting up the machine with the RC and its accoutrement) in its stead. I&#8217;m glad that my primary work on this machine consists of building various VMs to use for testing inside Virtual PC 2007. Presumably I need only copy those constituent files to a backup drive, rebuild the underlying system, then replace them in the &#8220;My Virtual Machines&#8221; folder to keep on using them no matter which version or kind of host OS is running to support them. More on this later, I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/bitten-by-the-eval-nature-of-vista-sp2-rc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
