 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Enterprise Desktop &#187; older Windows 7 PCs can&#8217;t use all of Windows 8&#8242;s advanced features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/tag/older-windows-7-pcs-cant-use-all-of-windows-8s-advanced-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:52:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Not everyone buys my &#8220;Heck no, we won&#8217;t go&#8221; argument for Win8</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/not-everyone-buys-my-heck-no-we-wont-go-argument-for-win8/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/not-everyone-buys-my-heck-no-we-wont-go-argument-for-win8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[older Windows 7 PCs can't use all of Windows 8's advanced features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 8 offers compelling value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=1883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last blog &#8212; entitled &#8220;Heck No, We Won&#8217;t Go! (from Windows 7 to Windows 8, that is)&#8221; &#8212; I argued that given how happy most folks are with Windows 7, and how little non-touch machines gain from the upgrade, that many satisfied Windows 7 users are unlikely to upgrade existing machines to the new [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last blog &#8212; entitled &#8220;<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/heck-no-we-wont-go-from-windows-7-to-windows-8-that-is/" target="_blank">Heck No, We Won&#8217;t Go!</a> (from Windows 7 to Windows 8, that is)&#8221; &#8212; I argued that given how happy most folks are with Windows 7, and how little non-touch machines gain from the upgrade, that many satisfied Windows 7 users are unlikely to upgrade existing machines to the new OS after it ships. Unsurprisingly, not everybody agrees with me: I&#8217;ve received email (and one comment) from a handful of readers advancing these arguments:</p>
<ul>
<li>A certain class of PC user is inclined to use the latest and greatest, no matter what it may be in the interests of keeping up</li>
<li>Another class of PC user (including your humble author) is required to work with (and in some cases like mine, write about) the latest Windows version  even now, as it&#8217;s in pre-beta status</li>
</ul>
<p>I have to concede that some people will indeed do the upgrade for all kinds of good reasons. But my argument is more along the lines of &#8220;those who don&#8217;t HAVE to probably won&#8217;t&#8221; rather than &#8220;nobody&#8217;s going to do it at all.&#8221; Of course, I also cheerfully confess that my previous post&#8217;s headline is a bit lurid and exaggerated, so I am probably overdue for a little &#8220;constructive feedback.&#8221;</p>
<p>For another interesting take on the interested in upgrading side of this discussion, check out Matt Egan&#8217;s very nice article for PC Advisor this morning (12/12/2011) entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/how-to/windows/3324376/why-2012-will-be-year-of-windows-8/" target="_blank">Why 2012 will be the year of Windows 8</a>.&#8221; His argument is worth reading, but my thumbnail sketch is that he believes that users are more interested in shared and common access to services and data, and that Windows 8&#8242;s ability to integrate apps and info across tablets, smartphones, and desktop is an unbeatable proposition that is also necessary to keep MS In the same league as Apple and Google.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2011/12/pcad01.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1885" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2011/12/pcad01.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="87" /></a></dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2011/12/pcad02.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1886" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2011/12/pcad02.jpg" alt="Headline for &quot;Year of Win8&quot; story" width="459" height="87" /></a></p>
<dd>Headline for Year of Win8 Story</dd>
<dl></dl>
<p>FWIW, I agree. But I also observe that the only way you get these advanced Windows 8 features is on new PCs with UEFI BIOS and with iX class CPUs with SLAT (or the AMD equivalent). Thus I believe this is a case where I can have my cake and eat it, too &#8212; because my previous argument is about UPGRADING from Windows 7 to Windows 8, not about buying new systems that support the full panoply of Windows 8&#8242;s advanced features. I stick by my argument having now had more time to realize that without these razzle-dazzle features, users will either stick with Windows 7 on older hardware or bite the bullet and buy new Windows 8 capable systems. I&#8217;m already speccing-out one such system myself! I&#8217;ll probably upgrade (or dual boot) some of my older systems with Win7/8 just to see how that works, and to better understand how far behind the curve pre-2010 PCs will be in a Windows 8 world.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/not-everyone-buys-my-heck-no-we-wont-go-argument-for-win8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
