 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Enterprise Desktop &#187; MS flubs performance hotfix for AMD Bulldozer on Win7 and WinSrv2008 R2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/tag/ms-flubs-performance-hotfix-for-amd-bulldozer-on-win7-and-winsrv2008-r2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>MS AMD Bulldozer Performance Fix Up and Down in 24 Hours</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/ms-amd-bulldozer-performance-fix-up-and-down-in-24-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/ms-amd-bulldozer-performance-fix-up-and-down-in-24-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MS flubs performance hotfix for AMD Bulldozer on Win7 and WinSrv2008 R2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, December 15, MS released a hotfix to &#8220;optimize the peformance of AMD Bulldozer CPUs&#8230;&#8221; for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2 (KB2592546). Seems that the original code base wasn&#8217;t properly set up to take full advantage of multi-threading in the Bulldozer architecture. According to some hurry-up benchmarking work from X-bit Labs, the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, December 15, MS released a hotfix to &#8220;<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2592546/" target="_blank">optimize the peformance of AMD Bulldozer CPUs&#8230;</a>&#8221; for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2 (KB2592546). Seems that the original code base wasn&#8217;t properly set up to take full advantage of multi-threading in the Bulldozer architecture. According to some hurry-up benchmarking work from X-bit Labs, the hotfix could boost performance anywhere from 2-10 percent, depending on the actual application involved &#8212; but only if that application is designed to run in multi-threaded fashion.</p>
<div id="attachment_1842" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 508px"><a href="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/74/files/2011/12/ms-amd-hotfix.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1842" src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/74/files/2011/12/ms-amd-hotfix.jpg" alt="Now you see it, now you do not!" width="498" height="123" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Now you see it, now you do not!</p></div>
<p>This morning, however, VR-Zone posted a story entitled &#8220;<a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/microsoft-pulls-down-the-amd-bulldozer-multi-threaded-patch/14267.html" target="_blank">Microsoft Pulls Down the AMD Bulldozer Multi-Threaded Patch</a>,&#8221; citing reports of user problems and peformance decreases for the reversal in course. While you can visit the Hotfix page for <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2592546/" target="_blank">KB2592546</a>, you&#8217;ll immediately notice that the download links on this page are no longer live.</p>
<div id="attachment_1843" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 514px"><a href="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/74/files/2011/12/ms-amd-nodownload.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1843" src="http://http.cdnlayer.com/itke/blogs.dir/74/files/2011/12/ms-amd-nodownload.jpg" alt="Later rather than sooner?" width="504" height="114" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Later rather than sooner?</p></div>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing that a development team is working feverishly to address whatever gotchas popped up following the inital drop of this release onto the Microsoft Support pages. I imagine we&#8217;ll see a round two on this stuff as soon as it&#8217;s judged to be &#8220;really working this time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very interesting!</p>
<p>[Note on 12/19: <a href="http://www.hardocp.com/news/2011/12/18/microsoft_pulls_bulldozer_performance_hotfix/" target="_blank">HardOCP</a> has since explained that the initial hotfix was incomplete, and got pulled because it demonstrated a negative effect -- that is, decreased performance -- on enough Bulldozer systems that MS apparently decided it was better off pulling the code than leaving it up for download.]</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/ms-amd-bulldozer-performance-fix-up-and-down-in-24-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
