 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Windows Enterprise Desktop &#187; and 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/tag/and-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:05:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>64-bit approaches parity with 32-bit versions for Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/64-bit-approaches-parity-with-32-bit-versions-for-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/64-bit-approaches-parity-with-32-bit-versions-for-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Tittel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[and 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparing 32- vs. 64-bit Windows versions for XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growing popularity of 64-bit desktop OSes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7 hits near-parity between 32- and 64-bit versions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an interesting table from CNET that reports on the 64-bit installed Windows base vis-v-vis 32-bit versions by OS for Windows 7, Vista, and XP: It certainly looks like the ability to access and use RAM sizes in excess of 3.1-3.2 GB or so (about the best you can do with Windows 7 32-bit versions, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20010092-75.html" target="_blank">table from CNET </a>that reports on the 64-bit installed Windows base vis-v-vis 32-bit versions by OS for Windows 7, Vista, and XP:</p>
<div id="attachment_952" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 526px"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2010/07/64-bit-vs-32-bit-windows1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-952" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/79/files/2010/07/64-bit-vs-32-bit-windows1.jpg" alt="CNET summarizes 64-bit OS usage from the MS Windows Update report for June 2010" width="516" height="274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">CNET summarizes 64-bit OS usage from the MS Windows Update report for June 2010</p></div>
<p>It certainly looks like the ability to access and use RAM sizes in excess of 3.1-3.2 GB or so (about the best you can do with Windows 7 32-bit versions, even with 4 GB of RAM installed) has to be contributing to this change in the makeup of the Windows OS distribution when it comes to relative numbers of 32- and 64-bit versions for recent Windows OSes. With memory getting cheaper, increasing use of virtual machines, and a growing number of applications designed to take advantage of 64-bit data structures, file sizes, and so forth, there are also lots more reasons why it makes sense to buy a PC with 64-bit Windows pre-installed, or to switch from 32-bit Windows XP or Vista when upgrading to Windows 7.</p>
<p>As I look at my own PC population in-house, I see that except where 64-bit versions aren&#8217;t possible (as on Atom-based netbooks) or don&#8217;t make sense (as on older hardware with 4 GB or less of RAM installed), my own preference has been to upgrade to 64-bit Windows 7 on existing hardware. All of the systems I&#8217;ve purchased recently (except for an HP MediaSmart Server, for which 64-bit Windows is not available) in fact, have come with Windows 7 pre-installed as well.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/64-bit-approaches-parity-with-32-bit-versions-for-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
