 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secunia Supplies Continuing Reminders of the Interesting State of Software Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/secunia-supplies-continuing-reminders-of-the-interesting-state-of-software-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/secunia-supplies-continuing-reminders-of-the-interesting-state-of-software-security/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 06:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Edtittel</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/secunia-supplies-continuing-reminders-of-the-interesting-state-of-software-security/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Edtittel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=1426#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Graham:

You are correct to observe that Secunia permits users to create &quot;ignore rules&quot; on an application-by-application basis. But because I&#039;m not using the Citrix remote access software and I can&#039;t legally obtain an updated and secure version of the program for my production PC, I actually [B]prefer[/B] to remove it from that machine. I understand that a program I&#039;m not using can&#039;t easily pose a security threat, but to me, the whole point of using Secunia is to keep up with what&#039;s current. Thus, Secunia&#039;s warning served me as a reminder to get rid of something I don&#039;t use and thus don&#039;t need. And that&#039;s why I got rid of it!

Hope that makes sense to you: it certainly does to me!

Thanks for the posting and the feedback,

--Ed--]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Graham:</p>
<p>You are correct to observe that Secunia permits users to create &#8220;ignore rules&#8221; on an application-by-application basis. But because I&#8217;m not using the Citrix remote access software and I can&#8217;t legally obtain an updated and secure version of the program for my production PC, I actually [B]prefer[/B] to remove it from that machine. I understand that a program I&#8217;m not using can&#8217;t easily pose a security threat, but to me, the whole point of using Secunia is to keep up with what&#8217;s current. Thus, Secunia&#8217;s warning served me as a reminder to get rid of something I don&#8217;t use and thus don&#8217;t need. And that&#8217;s why I got rid of it!</p>
<p>Hope that makes sense to you: it certainly does to me!</p>
<p>Thanks for the posting and the feedback,</p>
<p>&#8211;Ed&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grahamt</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/secunia-supplies-continuing-reminders-of-the-interesting-state-of-software-security/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Grahamt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=1426#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OOPS - sorry &quot;...if you had [B]put [/B]it’s folder name into an Ignore Rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOPS &#8211; sorry &#8220;&#8230;if you had [B]put [/B]it’s folder name into an Ignore Rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grahamt</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/secunia-supplies-continuing-reminders-of-the-interesting-state-of-software-security/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Grahamt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vista-enterprise-desktop/?p=1426#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed,

Are you using Secunia PSI version 2.0? 

And you could have kept your Citrix application if you had out it&#039;s folder name into an Ignore Rule.

Regards
Graham]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Are you using Secunia PSI version 2.0? </p>
<p>And you could have kept your Citrix application if you had out it&#8217;s folder name into an Ignore Rule.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
