May 15, 2012 8:01 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
MS to offer $15 upgrade to new PCs running Windows 7 Home Basic or better
, MS turns former free transition upgrades into for-a-fee but adds features
Wouldn’t you know it? Not until after I posted my own blog yesterday, did Paul Thurrott report in his SuperSite Blog that “Windows 8 Pro PC Upgrade Cost is just $15.” Looks like MS really, really, really wants to encourage new Windows 7 PC buyers to jump onto Windows 8, with a $14.99 promotion that begins on June 2, 2012 (original report appeared in a C|Net article by Mary Jo Foley entitled “Microsoft’s Windows 8 upgrade offer: What’s coming when?“)
Enough attribution, already! Here’s the deal: Microsoft will make this “Windows 8 Offer” available to consumers who buy a Windows 7 PC running Home Basic or higher editions, so they can download a copy once Windows 8 becomes generally available (around the end of October, according to most prognosticators). The Windows 8 Pro package aims squarely at business/technical users and enthusiasts, and includes built-in encryption, Hyper-V virtualization, PC management and domain connectivity, and will accommodate a separately priced Media Pack for Windows Media Center (which many guess will probably cost about the same as this offer).
Foley reports further that the deal will start up on June 2, 2012, about the same time that Microsoft plans to drop its Release Preview (aka Release Candidate). The deal stays good through the end of January 2013. MS won’t comment on any of this info, but Thurrott and Foley seem convinced it’s got legs. Keep your eyes out for more info in under three week when June 2 rolls around.
May 14, 2012 2:52 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
millions of Windows 8 users already online
US and India based online ad network and data analytics company Chitika reported in late April 2012 that “millions are already using the latest Microsoft operating system every day” (Study). In fact, the title of their study proclaims that “Windows 8 Consumer Preview Usage Double that of Mac OS X Mountain Lion,” the most current Mac OS X version in use when the study was conducted and reported. Here’s a chart that shows the breakdown of the study’s user population based on “hundreds of millions of ad impressions from within the Chitika Ad network” taken from April 13 through April 19, 2012:
On the Web today 0.13% translates into millions of users
Perhaps the most amazing thing about the study is understanding that if “millions” from the Chitika point of view translates into 2 million actual users, that puts the total size of their sample population at 1.5 billion, give or take a few hundred million one way or the other! This also roughly matches the size of the total online global population, which gives the company a loooooooooong reach. Given that the size of their sample is reported as hundreds of millions in size, however, their total base has to be under a billion by definition, which means that their breathless “millions of users” is probably not much over the one million mark, if it truly is that much. I can’t find any concrete published numbers from Microsoft on the total number of copies of Windows 8 CP downloaded, which would set a hard upper bound on the number of potential users, either… In any case, that still points to a pretty sizable user population for the Windows 8 Customer Preview.
On a more serious note, these kinds of adoption and usage levels do seem to indicate that Windows 8 has some kind of future ahead of it, no matter how dire or delirious some pundit’s predictions about its success or failure might be. As far as I’m concerned, while the jury is still way out on how much uptake Windows 8 will enjoy in the marketplace, there’s apparently no shortage of willing users even now, before the new OS has gone all the way commercial. What I want to watch, very closely, is how many buyers opt for Windows 8 by choice when buying new PCs once that option is presented to them. This will be a far more telling statistic, as and when such numbers make themselves available late next October and through the end of 2012.
May 11, 2012 4:21 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
ECS G11 AIO touchscreen offers bargain experience
, interesting all-in-one barebones may make a nice Win8 platform
Earlier this week I stumbled across a January PC Magazine story entitled “Build a Touch-Screen All-in-One Desktop.” The star of the story is from EliteGroup (a Taiwanese mega-manufacturer of PCs and parts) known as the G11, a bare-bones compact PC with an integrated 21.5″ touchscreen and lots of other interesting and useful features (check out the PDF specsheet for a nice overview).
The ECS G11 is more utilitarian than high style as AIOs go
The upshot of the PC Magazine story is that you can put together a nice Windows 7 touchscreen PC for under $850 by adding your own CPU, memory, hard disk, and slide-in slimline DVD burner. Matthew Murray’s story features the following selection of parts to put that modest system together: ECS G11 ($449), i3-2120 CPU ($117), 2x4GB DDR3 SO-DIMM RAM ($40), 2 TB WD Caviar Black hard disk ($200), and a Lite-On DS-8A5S DVD burner ($33; actual total: $839; today you can get the 2 TB Caviar Green for $120, the memory for $37, and the DVD burner for $24; so today’s price is a nice and low $747).
I started wondering about the other possible tack, with Windows 8 in mind. What kind of top-of-the-line configuration might it be possible to install in this compact unit to use it as a Windows 8 learning, test, or pilot machine? Here’s what I came up with:
- The ECS G11 works with any Sandy Bridge processor whose TDP is 65 W or less. That means the i7 2600S will work, and these i5 items: 2500S, 2500T, 2405S, 2400S, and 2390T. All of the i3 models are rated 65 W TDP. Today’s going price for the quad-core 2.8 GHz 2600S is $310.
- The ECS G11 can handle 16 GB of RAM, using two 8-GB DDR3 SO-DIMMs. I found some serviceable GeIL units for $99.
- Instead of an optical drive, I selected a slim-line SATA drive tray to 2.5″ drive enclosure from NewModeus for $42 to accommodate an OCZ Vertex 3 55 GB SSD for an ultra-fast boot drive at $65 (after $15 mail-in rebate), along with a 2 TB Samsung Ecogreen SATA hard disk at $120.
- Most people who work on PCs want a mouse and keyboard at some point, too, so I picked the Logitech MK710 desktop set for $70.
- A mini PCI-e 802.11n wireless and Bluetooth combo card adds wireless capability to the unit and goes for $26.
When it comes to installation for all this stuff, I refer back to Murray’s PC Mag story, because it includes photographs and step-by-step instructions to put all these part in their proper places — except for the optical to SSD tray install, which requires plugging the drive into the internal SATA connection inside the tray, and then installing the tray just as you’d install the optical drive.
The ECS G11 is still priced at $449, so my total top-of-the line budget comes to $1,181. For just over $1,200 you can add in the cost of a portable USB-based optical drive to plug into this unit to write or write CDs or DVDs should you need to (I have two such units already, and suspect many other readers here do as well, which is why I didn’t make it part of my baseline budget, believing that the combination of an SSD for the boot/system drive and a bigger but slower data drive would be much more compelling).
I do still have some open questions, though: I’m working to find out if the ECS G11 supports SLAT, which is mandatory to take advantage of Hyper-V support in Windows 8. Ditto for the motherboard’s support for UEFI, necessary to use Windows’s pre-boot malware protection capabilities. I’ll report back as I find out more (I’m trying to get in touch with Elitegroup’s Fremont, CA offices, and have also e-mailed Matthew Murray to see if he knows more than he included in his PC Mag story).
May 9, 2012 2:47 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
Scott Fulton has just written a bang-up story for ReadWriteWeb entitled “Top 10 Windows 8 Features #7: Client-side Hyper-V.” It’s a gem of a story not just because it explains why Hyper-V beats the pants off the Virtual PC technology that made Windows XP Mode feasible (but alas, never terribly popular) on Windows 7, but also because it takes you through all the steps necessary to convert older virtual machines from the Virtual PC/Virtual Server environment into their Hyper-V compatible counterparts.
Client-side Hyper-V Makes the top 10 for Scott Fulton
Running users through a sequence of Hyper-V setup and configuration screens, Scott explains what settings are needed and how they should be populated to enable Hyper-V to mount and use these VMs in the Windows 8 environment (or on other PCs that support Hyper-V including Windows Server 2008 R2 and the upcoming Windows Server 8 as well). Combine this with Sysinternals Disk2VHD tool, and you’ve got a sure-fire way to keep legacy OS images alive and well in the brave new world of Hyper-V that’s now on its way to a desktop near you (if not already on your own desktop).
May 7, 2012 2:35 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
NIS beta 2013 plays well with Win8
, Symantec releases beta 2013 versions of NAV NIS & Norton 360
Symantec recently announced general availability of its various Norton 2013 beta products, including Norton AntiVirus, Norton Internet Security, and Norton 360. Although they come only with two weeks (14 days) of free subscription support, these programs may be worth trying out for those running Windows 8 to get a sense of how third-party security software functions in a Windows 8 runtime environment.
I’d already been running NIS 2012 on a couple of Windows 8 Customer Preview machines with great success, so it was interesting to see what kinds of differences showed up between the current year’s version and the impending (beta) release. The interface has been spruced up and is a great deal more Windows 8 friendly, and it seems like the overall system footprint is lighter and speedier, though a full system scan still manages to consume appreciable levels of system resources.
During a full system scan NIS CPU usage peaks at around 40%
That said, the full system scan on my i7-2640M X220 T notebook, with just under 40 GB of stuff on the C: drive, took just over 20 minutes to complete and caused no perceptible system drag as I opened IE windows, and ran various other applications while the scan was underway (Gabe Topala’s excellent System Information For Windows, Windows Explorer, the Snipping Tool, and so forth).
But so far, I can’t get Norton Management on my Windows 7 production machine running NIS 2012 to “see” the test machine running beta NIS 2013, or vice-versa. I may have to do some additional futzing around to get this to work. But from what I can see when logged into my Norton Account online, it looks like there’s some kind of deliberate isolation of the beta from production versions (later note: it uses a completely different account login, so there is a deliberate separation between beta and production accounts). I’m going to keep exploring the beta and will report back further as and when I learn anything interesting. But so far, it seems completely on par with the production 2012 version, if not slightly less intrusive (a pretty nice accomplishment, considering what a great job Symantec has already done in reducing Norton’s once-substantial footprint to something less obnoxious in the past 3-4 years).
May 4, 2012 5:02 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
There’s been some discussion recently in relation to the Enterprise edition of Windows 8 that it will be made available only to subscribers to Microsoft’s Software Assurance program. Not so! Subscribers to the Windows Intune program pay a monthly per-seat fee for this service, and what they’re paying for includes a license to Windows Enterprise for each such seat, in addition to the management and configuration tools and services that come along as part of the overall deal. Methods for grabbing the download are addressed in an SMB-oriented TechNet blog post entitled “Windows Intune: How Do My Customers Get Windows 7 Enterprise?”
Enterprise upgrade included in the $11 monthly fee
For $11 per PC per month (up to 25 machines), PCs with some version of Windows Professional already installed can partake of Intune. No bare metal coverage here, sorry. If you want into Intune with a do-it-yourself PC, you’ll have to buy or otherwise acquire a license for Windows Professional or better before you can use what MS calls “the upgrade rights to Windows 7 Enterprise.”
Perhaps it’s a leap of faith, but I’m assuming the deal for Windows 8 will remain more or less the same once the product becomes generally available, so this represents another way for users to get into Windows Enterprise 8 without necessarily getting into a Software Assurance deal with Microsoft.
May 2, 2012 2:14 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
back and start tips in Windows 8 activate using mouse button
- Lower left corner is where the Start screen thumbnail appears
It’s been two months now, and I’m finally starting to get comfortable with Windows 8 and the nuances of the touch-based interface and its various mouse equivalents. That’s why I found myself nodding my head when reading two recent articles from Paul Thurrott on his Supersite for Windows:
The idea behind these activities is similar, and involves a bit of a change from normal mouse selection behavior to make them work properly — something of a trick, in fact — that highlights a lot of what’s new, different, and occasionally frustrating about the Windows 8 interface. In each case moving the mouse cursor into the upper left corner (for the back tip) and lower left corner (for the start tip) works the same way: after moving the mouse to elicit the corresponding thumbnail display (a miniature Start screen at lower left, a miniature display of the last application accessed at upper left), you must click the left mouse button to switch to the display that’s showing in the thumbnail.
I experienced some frustration with these functions until I got that trick and started clicking the mouse button instead of trying to move the cursor to “grab” the thumbnail itself. Doesn’t work, and in fact, makes the thumbnail disappear. Who knew?
April 30, 2012 4:23 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
using Windows 8 to host a production Windows 7 environment
, Windows 8 Hyper-V beat Windows 7 with Virtual PC
I had a very interesting conversation with former Microsoft MVP and current MS employee and “virtualization guy” John Savill last Friday. I’ve recently had to back out of my role as a primary author for an upcoming Windows 8 book, thanks to a welcome and unexpected surfeit of expert witness work, and have therefore found myself with some pretty neat but underutilized test equipment that I want to switch over to a production role.
The reason why I called John was to ask him how best to migrate my current 32-bit Windows 7 production environment to my latest desktop test rig (a home-built desktop that includes a socket 1155 motherboard, i7 2700K CPU, 32 GB of RAM, an OCZ Vertex 3 SSD, and an nVidia 650 GTX graphics card). Not coincidentally, John now works for Microsoft as a virtualization expert, with equal emphasis on both desktop and server virtualization, so I figured he’d have some useful suggestions to make. For Windows long-timers, some may remember John from the late 1990′s as the brains behind the Windows NT FAQ which he ran independently back then (it’s now a permanent part of the Windows IT Pro Website as the FAQ For Microsoft Windows). He’s also the author of numerous books on Windows Server versions from NT 4.0 through Windows Server 2008, including his latest title Microsoft Virtualization Secrets, due out in August, 2012).
Look for added illumination on a hot topic when Savill gets his book out come August
His first suggestion came as no surprise to me at all: he recommended that I use the excellent Sysinternals Disk2VHDto capture my current runtime production environment. Through no coincidence whatsoever, in planning to upgrade that machine to accommodate 8 more GB of RAM I’ve purchased (running 32-bit at present, it can only handle 4 GB of RAM which is how much it has installed as well), I’d already used that tool to make a snapshot to give me access to any settings, preferences, passwords, and so forth, I might somehow lose in making the move from 32- to 64-bit Windows 7 on the original machine.
But John’s next suggestion really floored me, though in a thought-provoking way: He also urged me to go ahead and switch over to the Customer Preview of Windows 8 on my new hardware, since it was expressly purchased to meet Windows 8 requirements (UEFI, SLAT support, and even a touch screen). I gave him the usual “still can’t get my head around the desktop metaphor and organization” stall, to which he replied with three remarks:
1. Get used to it; it’s not going to change.
2. Hyper-V beats the pants off Virtual PC, even as implemented for Windows XP Mode in Windows 7.
3. Windows 8 is already “extremely stable,” so if you keep working on a VM, it will be trivial to jump from Customer Preview to final release.
I’d planned to set up a production native Windows 7 64-bit environment and slowly cheese over from 32- to the 64-bit world, but his remarks have me thinking pretty serious about cheesing over from a 32- to 64-bit Windows 7 VM instead, running on top of Windows 8. I have plenty of horsepower and memory to burn on this new machine, so why not? I have some major deadlines this week, or I might have tried it already, but I’m leaning ever more seriously in this direction, and will keep you posted on my thought processes and progress.
April 27, 2012 4:21 PM
Posted by: Ed Tittel
no need for MSE 4.0 in Windows 8
, Windows 8 built-in anti-malware functions are complete and robust
When I saw the news that Microsoft Security Essentials (4.0) had recently been released (see Paul Thurrott’s Microsoft Security Essentials 4.0 blog post for more information and a download link), I quite naturally found myself wondering if MSE and Windows 8 might finally collide. When I first installed the customer preview in late February of 2012, I tried to install MSE 2.0 shortly thereafter, only to have the installer inform me that the program was incompatible with my version of Windows. Thinking that now that MSE developers must surely take cognizance of Windows 8 with the Customer Preview already out, and more releases in the offing for July and October, I tried to install it on my Windows 8 desktop, only to be greeted with this very interesting results window:
In Windows 8 Defender handles more than spyware
You’ll notice that the preceding message include language indicates that Windows 8 essentially includes the same capabilities as MSE 4.0, built into the Defender module whose name is familiar since the days of Windows Vista. Although the Building Windows 8 blog addressed the OSes anti-malware capabilities in a post dated September 15, 2011, it hadn’t dawned on me that Windows 8 includes comprehensive, built-in anti-malware protection right out of the box. But when I saw this message from the MSE 4.0 installer, I started doing my homework, and learned that there’s a lot more to Defender in Windows 8 than there was in either Windows 7 or Vista.
The blog post says it best: “The improvements to Windows 8 Defender will help protect you from all types of malware, including viruses, worms, bots, and rootkits by using the complete set of malware signatures from the Microsoft Malware Protection Center, which Windows Update will deliver regularly with the latest Microsoft antimalware engine.” Also: “…Windows Defender will no provide you with real-time detection and protection from malware threats using a file system filter, and will interface with Windows secured boot, another new Windows 8 protection feature.”
This blog post (“Protecting you from malware“) is worth a (re)-read because it covers Windows 8 anti-malware features and protections pretty comprehensively. I certainly perused it with more interest and attention than I did last year, now that I’m running several systems with the Windows 8 Customer Preview. Maybe I didn’t really need the Norton Internet Security 2012 I installed on my Windows 8 desktop, after all?