It doesn’t seem like that much time has gone by since the release of Windows 7, but free mainstream support for that operating system from Microsoft comes to an end on January 13, 2015. On July 2, 2014, MS Support posted a notification entitled “Products Reaching End of Support in the Second Half of 2014” (thanks to Mary Jo Foley and a recent ZDnet post for alerting me to this). Title notwithstanding, the second heading on page provides the lead-in for this discussion, and reads “Key Products Transitioning from Mainstream Support to Extended Support.” The explanation for Extended Support proffered there is very much worth repeating here, to help put this transition into its proper context:
Extended Support lasts for 5 years and includes security updates at no cost, and paid hotfix support. Additionally, Microsoft will not accept requests for design changes or new features during the Extended Support phase.
The following screen cap shows a list of Windows 7 products moving to extended support (for the complete list, which also includes specific releases of MS Dynamics, Exchange Server 2010, Windows Embedded and Phone, Windows Server 2008 including R2, and Windows Storage Server 2008 also including R2, please consult the notification page):
Any and all Windows 7 versions transition to Extended Support on 1/13/2015.
Does this mean that the end of life for Windows 7 is at hand? No, as the MS explanation clearly states, it still has 5 years of life left once it attains Extended Support status. But with the relentless forward march of technology continuing unabated after that, the requirement for paid hotfixes, and the absence of new features or design changes Windows 7 can’t help but be left behind in the face of new hardware and software that is certain to appear during that time window. Will enterprises want to risk being left behind to avoid migration? I have to believe the answer will shade from “Fine by us” as the 5-year-clock starts ticking, but enterprises will become increasingly less complacent — tending more toward “urgent” to “desperate” — as the 60-month window of ongoing but limited support for Windows 7 starts closing.
What does it all mean? For those enterprises who migrated to Win7 more than two years ago, it means they probably already expected to start planning the next migration at about that time (January 2015). For those who’ve completed their migrations (or haven’t yet done so) it means they must face a compressed migration schedule as their next technology lifecycle turns over.
Here’s a nice graphic from the Microsoft Security Response Center’s latest blog post, entitled “July 2014 Security Bulletin Release;” it summarizes the items pushed out via Windows Update yesterday, July 8, and presents a new look and feel for security bulletin stuff.
Sharp colors and simple labeling let you absorb the latest security bulletin deployment priorities at a glance (full-size original).
And now that MS has stopped e-mailing advance notifications and update information to users, in response to a Canadian governmental anti-spam initiative, they’ve set up something called the MyBulletins “security bulletins customization free online service,” which enables registered users to create custom dashboards so they can track security bulletins related to products and platforms deployed on their systems and networks. Here’s a snipped of what my dashboard looks like, after I registered interest in Windows 8.1 and 7, various .NET Framework releases, Windows Server 2012 and R2, and so forth.
MS now offers a way to customize a security bulletin dashboard to track only products and platforms of interest to IT professionals.
On the face of things, I’d say that MS has come up with a reasonable and perhaps even more usable alternative to its now-obsolete and unavailable e-mail notifications for security bulletins. Check it out, and see for yourself!
At the end of last week, ZDNet’s Mary Jo Foley posted a story on the upcoming next major Windows release, code-named Threshold, often called Windows 9. She slipped an interesting remark right past me therein, called into sharp relief by a follow-up story I read this morning on Gidgets.com. Here’s a paragraph from MJF’s story that lays out an interesting hypothetical situation surrounding that upcoming release:
The Microsoft OS team is hoping to get as many Windows 7 users moved to Windows 7 Service Pack 1 and Windows 8 users to Windows 8.1 Update in preparation for (hopefully) getting them to move to Threshold once it is out. It’s still early in the Windows development cycle for Microsoft to have decided on packaging, pricing and distribution, but my sources say, at this point, that Windows Threshold is looking like it could be free to all Windows 8.1 Update, and maybe even Windows 7 Service Pack 1, users.
Here’s one cut at a logo for the next generation of Windows for the desktop (Windows 9 Logo Wallpaper).
This certainly poses one interesting and compelling way for Microsoft to stimulate wholesale upgrades to Windows 9 for a large majority of users. With Windows 7 SP1 now representing over 50% of the installed Windows based, and Windows 8.* versions accounting for roughly 12% or so of what’s left over, this could provide a straightforward way to achieve critical mass for the next major Windows release. Certainly, Apple experienced higher conversion rates when they stopped charging for major releases of OS X, so there’s no reason to expect that Windows behavior would differ significantly. That said, a great many more enterprise desktops, notebooks, tablets, and so forth run Windows than MacOS, and we all understand that even if it’s cheap for such organizations to migrate, there are many other factors (and a great deal more time, effort, and expense) involved in making wholesale migrations at the large end of the scale.
This is undoubtedly an interesting hypothetical to consider, and possibly even a positive inducement for some parties to make the move up to Windows 9 from earlier versions. But from an enterprise perspective, it is only one small consideration among a host of others that can’t help but involve significant time, effort, and expense in planning and implementing an OS migration. I’d have to guess that a free upgrade wouldn’t impact corporate and large organization lifecycle planning much, if at all. It should be interesting to keep an eye on this, and to see what it morphs into in the months ahead. If other rumors about Windows 9 have any merit, we should be hearing more about the new OS later this year, and witness the developer and consumer preview releases late in 2014 and early 2015 respectively, with a GA release about a year from now. There is still plenty of time for things to change and for rumors to coalesce into actual, announced plans and releases. Stay tuned!
In poring over Paul Thurrott’s SuperSite for Windows this morning, I found a tantalizing recommendation amidst his tweets to a HooToo device called the HT-UE01 3-port USB 3.0 Hub with GbE Converter. This is a case where a picture tells the story (or at least, explains the motivation for owning such a device) rather nicely, so here ’tis, straight from the Amazon product page:
Most compact Win8 tablets offer at most 2 (usually 1) USB 3.0 port and no wired Ethernet; this device adds the latter and provides 3 more of the former.
At about $29, the device isn’t exactly dirt-cheap. But it won’t break the bank, either, and offers a compact and portable way to add more ports to the current crop of thin-and-light tablets that are increasingly available, such as the Surface family from MS, the Dell Venue 8 and 11 Pro models, the upcoming ThinkPad 10, and the Fujitsu Q704 series. I’ve found that I like to use a mouse, a Bluetooth keyboard, and one or more fast UFDs when I’m on the road (not much access to wired GbE on the plane just yet), so the added USB ports are quite welcome. This device looks like a worthwhile addition to one’s traveling tablet kit when away from the office. Check it out!
Over the past few months, I’ve blogged repeatedly about issues related to installing (or rather, failing to install) the Windows 8.1 Update 1 for Windows 8.1. Windows experts such as Woody Leonhard (at InfoWorld) and Paul Thurrott (at his SuperSite for Windows) have dug into those details, and I blogged about them repeatedly myself here (especially in connection with KB 2919355). Recent rumors are divided, however, about whether or not the upcoming Windows 8.1 Update 2 (which most sources indicate should become available in August 2014) will be released through the Windows Store or through Windows Update.
Who knew that Windows Update would prove preferable to the Windows Store?
As some readers may be aware, Windows 8.1 itself was promulgated through the Windows Store, and there were plenty of issues with that delivery mechanism, too. While the majority of users were able to download and install the update from the Store without difficulty, an unspecified minority (estimates range from below 1% to as high as 2-3%) found themselves unable to get completely through the installation process. Some of that minority, in fact, found themselves stuck between the old version and the new, requiring a complete reinstall of Windows to regain access to their desktops and file systems. Ouch!
This morning, WinBeta.org is reporting that MS is “testing Windows 8.1 upgrades for Windows 8 users via Windows Update.” In covering the same phenomenon, Paul Thurrott produces this memorable conclusion to his posting entitled: “Microsoft Works to Get Windows 8/RT Users updates to 8.1:”
Given the experience of the Store-based Windows 8.1 update, I suspect that’s the last time we’ll see Microsoft do such a thing. I expect all future Windows updates to ship via Windows Update, as God intended.
I’m not sure if distribution of Windows Updates is a matter for divine providence, but I have to agree that Windows updates, patches, and fixes seem to work better when delivered through the Windows Update service. Perhaps that means that rumors about the upcoming Windows 8.1 Update 2 distribution through the Windows Store will not pan out, much to everybody’s relief — including Mr. Thurrott’s, as well as mine!
Last week, I reported that OneDrive raised the ceiling on free storage, and that Google Drive was one of two other free providers (Copy.com is the other) to match their 15 GB storage allotment. I also reported that by signing up for Office 365, MS subscribers obtain a 1 TB OneDrive storage allotment in addition to access to the online components in Office. Today, I’m reporting that Google has fired another salvo in what appears to be an emerging online services and storage conflict — namely, access to Google Apps for Business plus unlimited storage (or 1 TB per user if 5 or fewer users from the same organization sign up) for $10 a month per user. Because Microsoft charges $12.50 to $15.00 a month for 25-300 users ($5.00 per user, per month for a minimum of 5 users, but no access to full installed versions nor tablet access on iPad or Windows PCs) this is very much in the same ballpark as the Microsoft offering, give or take $30 – 60 per user in annual fees.
Google Drive storage on a pay-as-you-go basis includes Google Apps for Business, unlimited storage for 5+ user accounts.
I can’t help but see the “unlimited storage” option as Google’s way of inducing prospective customers to buy into their apps package, as a presumably natural consequence of gaining the cloud-based storage they need. On the face of it, the storage is easy to access and simple to use. Because synchronization occurs in the background over time, users don’t notice how long it takes to transfer data from the cloud drive to a local drive, or vice-versa (a test copy of the 3.4 GB Windows 8.1 64-bit ISO file reported instantaneous completion, and resulted in upload rates between 800 KBits and 6 MBits as the copy made its way from my local drive to the Google repository online over a half-hour period or so). Could it be that Google is thinking users will ultimately say “I came for the storage, and stayed for the apps?” That’s my best guess at this point.
One thing’s for sure: the cost of online storage and a safe repository for online backups and other important digital assets, just got a whole, whole bunch cheaper. Look out Carbonite, Mozy, et al: Google is coming to eat your lunch!
Those who follow the Windows OS rumor mill have learned over the past few years that when Russian “leaker” WZOR offers up information — an identity carefully enough shrouded that nobody’s sure whether it’s a single individual or a group of like-minded Windows-heads — it’s usually worth checking out, and often turns out to be correct.
According to an archetypal “usually reliable source,” Windows 8.1 Update 2 will make its debut here in mid-July.
As reported in Woody Leonhard’s blog post for Infoworld yesterday (6/26/2014) entitled “Windows 8.1 Update 2 likely hit RTM, could debut in July,” WZOR tweeted two intriguing rumors about the next upcoming update to the current Windows desktop OS:
1. The update will be announced at the upcoming Worldwide Partner Conference (WPC) to be held in Washington DC from July 13-17
2. The official sign-off for the Windows 8.1 Update 2 release to manufacturing (RTM) build has reached (or is reaching) final, frozen status some time this week, possibly even yesterday (6/27) or today (6/28)
It’s not unusual for information about impending MS releases to make their way out the door in advance of Microsoft’s own carefully orchestrated PR maneuvers and official announcements. What is unusual about Windows 8.1 Update 2 is that we still know very little about what’s inside the update package, as it were. Even Woody can only speculate on its contents, and repeat shared beliefs about the upcoming release, which include the following recitations:
1. The Start menu is highly unlikely to make its return in this release, triumphant or otherwise
2. There probably won’t be a mechanism to run Modern UI apps in desktop Windows (a la Stardock’s ModernMix)
3. The update will most likely be available through the Windows Store rather than via Windows Update
4. After some delay period occurs (2-3 months, if the Update 1 history is any guide), this Update will be mandatory for those wishing to receive further future updates
5. Woody speculates further that “…most bets emphasize plumbing changes in Update 2 and very little if anything on the UI side” to which I’ll add the observation that key components in earlier Service Pack releases invariably included update roll-ups from past patches and fixes: something similar is highly likely to be part of Update 2 as well
Other than that, we don’t know much. But at least, we won’t have to wait too much longer (about three weeks from today) before these rumors can be confirmed, corrected, or denied by the reality presented at WPC — or not, as the case may be. Stay tuned!
Seems like there’s a lot happening with OneDrive lately. Above and beyond the features added or changed in the wake of June’s Patch Tuesday (here’s my blog on that stuff), MS has just announced that users’ free disk allocations are increasing. Everyday users will get their allocations bumped from 7 to 15 GB effective immediately, while Office 365 subscribers now get 1 TB of storage space per subscriber. Group Program Manager Omar Shahine blogged the details about this increase to the OneDrive Blog in a Monday, 6/23/2014 post entitled “Massive increase to OneDrive storage plans: 15 GB free for everyone, 1 TB for Office 365 subscribers.”
By giving away some appreciable space, does MS hope that OneDrive users will buy more at above-average rates?
This morning I was also pleased to see a ZDnet story from security and mobility maven Larry Seltzer entitled “Cloud storage price check” that helps to put this offer (and the further implications of buying in heavily to OneDrive) in perspective. There, he reveals that Microsoft’s upped allotments are actually fairly generous — only one other player listed, Bitcasa, exceeds their free space offer, while Google Drive and Copy.com match it — but that their prices for additional storage fall on the more expensive end of the spectrum. To be more specific, MS charges between $0.0321 up to $0.0388 per GB of online storage in OneDrive depending on the size commitment (curiously, with larger commitments costing more not less!), where the lowest prices fall in a range of $0.0024 to $0.0098 per GB from vendors MediaFire, Bitcasa, and Google Drive. Nobody’s saying that the free storage is an attempt to entice users to buy more at higher prices to make up for that lagniappe, but it’s hard not to think such thoughts when looking at the second table in Mr. Seltzer’s very nice article.
At the cheapest rates published for pay-as-you-go OneDrive storage space online, the 1 TB for Office 365 subscribers is worth $32.87 to $39.73 per month. That more than covers the cost of access to Office 365 by itself, and may actually provide a measurable inducement for customers who’ve been considering a subscription to go ahead and sign up. If that means you, I’d recommend acting soon enough to take advantage of this offer: it can’t last forever!
On a happier front, Jason Moore of the OneDrive team announced this morning (June 25) that MS is pushing updates to OneDrive for iOS and Android to simplify storing photos and videos from their devices onto OneDrive. iOS users will also be able to open Office documents of all kinds directly inside Office Mobile on their iPhones, or Office for iPad on the eponymous device.
I was looking at some screen caps in a utility from Sergey Tkachenko over at WinAero.com (for a nice little utility called This PC Tweaker) when I suddenly realized that the Libraries icon and listing had gone missing. After scratching my head a bit, a quick google search turned up a PC World article from Rick Broida that reminded me that MS had inexplicably turned off this display when they released the 8.1 update. Turns out I’ve been selectively restoring this on some, but not all of my PCs, and I just happened to be working on that hadn’t yet gotten this interface tweak.
If you’re in the same boat, here’s how to turn the Libraries back on in your Windows 8.1 installation, too:
1. Inside File Explorer, click the View tab.
2. Click the Navigation Pane, then make sure the check next to Libraries is selected (it’s turned off in the following screen cap, so you’d click it to turn it back on).
A single click turns libraries back on in File Explorer, once you get to the right control.
Though it’s a mystery as to why MS decided to turn Libraries off by default, at least it’s relatively easy to turn them back on. Go figure!
I’ve been shopping around for a new laptop lately. There are lots of interesting choices out there, but I’ve noticed something very interesting about pricing. Let me illustrate:
1. MS Surface Pro 3 i7 256 GB SSD, 8GB RAM $1,549 512 GB SSD $1,949 Difference $400 Cost of Samsung 500 GB $280 (Newegg)
2. Lenovo ThinkPad W540 Base model $1,569
Add $140 for i7-4800MQ CPU, $380 for i7-4900MQ, $930 for i7-4930MX
Add $70 for 1920×1080 screen with color sensor, add $200 for 2880×1621 IPS display, $70 more for same with color sensor
Add $250 to upgrade from NVidia Quadro K1100M 2G to K2100M 2G display card
Add $140 to upgrade from 8 GB to 16 GB RAM (4x4GB), $260 for same (2x8GB), $650 for 32 GB (4x8GB)
Add $170 to upgrade from 500 GB 7,200 RPM HD to 128 GB SSD, $270 for 256 GB SSD, $620 for 512 GB SSD
Add $40 to install 40 GB M.2 SSD (no other options available, though 42mm M.2 SSDs up to 256 GB are available for around $180)
3. Fujitsu Stylistic Q704 Hybrid Tablet $1,649 i5-4300U, 128GB SSD, 4GB RAM
Add $160 to upgrade to 8 GB RAM
Add $300 to upgrade to i7-4600U vPRO CPU
Add $200 to upgrade to 256 GB SSD
In cases 1 and 3, the ultra-slim tablet format for each of those PCs means that the builder must often choose to solder devices onto the motherboard rather than use a socket mount of some kind, simply to achieve the narrowest possible height profile. But they do mark up additions to memory and storage well beyond the retail price difference (and they’re not paying retail, either) between higher and lower capacity memory and storage configurations. To some extent, I can see this as taking advantage of a captive audience (which must either buy the higher capacity from the maker or forgo it completely). I don’t have to like it, though, and it bugs me to see this as a standard industry practice.
Lenovo’s W540 is more puzzling. Lenovo is always good about making its maintenance manuals available to owners of its equipment, where they’ll find detailed instructions on upgrading most internal components for those devices that can be swapped out in the field. Here’s what I did to my current traveling laptops, for example:
- I upgraded an X220 Tablet from 4 to 16 GB RAM, from an HD to an SSD, and to which I added an mSATA SSD in the PCI-e Express socket available for either storage or a WWAN device
- I did likewise to a T520 ThinkPad, and swapped out its DVD drive bay for a 2.5″ drive caddy that now accommodates a 1 TB Seagate SSHD for backup and extended storage as well
For the W540, there’s nothing to stop a motivated buyer from purchasing the minimum default configuration, then installing more RAM, swapping an SSD for the 500 GB HD, adding one or two M.2 42 MM SSDs into the available slots on that machine for up to 512 GB of additional SSD storage, and replacing the optical drive with an HD/drive bay combination. The cost differential between DIY and paying Lenovo to it for you could be over $1,000, even accounting for extra parts (additional memory modules, the 500 GB default HD, and a drive bay to replace the optical drive) that a DIY-er must buy that Lenovo need not purchase.
Is there a moral to this story? Yes, actually there are several. First, if you want to max out ultrabooks or tablets, you and your employer will have to resign yourselves to paying a premium to acquire added processing power, storage, or RAM. Second, if you decide to acquire a field-upgradable notebook or laptop, you may want to perform a time-vs-savings tradeoff analysis for management to ponder. Even accounting for the fully-burdened overhead cost of labor for acquisition, installation and testing of in-house upgrades, it may still be cheaper to use company staff to handle those tasks and do it yourselves, rather than to pay the premium prices that PC vendors routinely charge to deliver PCs with more oomph than standard configurations deliver.