 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defragmenting virtual machine disk files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/defragmenting-virtual-machine-disk-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/defragmenting-virtual-machine-disk-files/</link>
	<description>A SearchVMware.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:50:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottElsdon</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/defragmenting-virtual-machine-disk-files/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottElsdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/?p=427#comment-1305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, interestign reading,

I wondered if defragmentsing woudl gain space back on a large FP server.  In the past, I&#039;ve used diskkeeper to derfag a phys server,  consolodatign the cluseters we gained around 10 gig on a 300 gig drive after defragmentation on a box that had never been defragged before.  Would there be a similar advantage on a virtualised box, or is the OS cluster usage transparant at the physical SAN layer ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, interestign reading,</p>
<p>I wondered if defragmentsing woudl gain space back on a large FP server.  In the past, I&#8217;ve used diskkeeper to derfag a phys server,  consolodatign the cluseters we gained around 10 gig on a 300 gig drive after defragmentation on a box that had never been defragged before.  Would there be a similar advantage on a virtualised box, or is the OS cluster usage transparant at the physical SAN layer ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasture</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/defragmenting-virtual-machine-disk-files/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/?p=427#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great, this site doesn&#039;t work properly with Opera...nevermind, just copy-paste from my first post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, this site doesn&#8217;t work properly with Opera&#8230;nevermind, just copy-paste from my first post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yao</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/defragmenting-virtual-machine-disk-files/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Yao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/virtualization-pro/?p=427#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[defragment  should be run in guest os, also run sdelete to write null after running defrag  can get vm-backup better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>defragment  should be run in guest os, also run sdelete to write null after running defrag  can get vm-backup better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
