<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rant: Anyone else dislike those &#8220;enter the letters you see below&#8221; confirmation pages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jlees</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jlees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Awesome example, Suzmonster! I hadn't heard of this one beforebefore-- and who deoesn't like kitty cats and puppy dogs?!?! 

Thanks for contributing to the conversation!

Plus, it let me know what CAPTCHA meant, (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) --- That's a mouth full!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome example, Suzmonster! I hadn&#8217;t heard of this one beforebefore&#8211; and who deoesn&#8217;t like kitty cats and puppy dogs?!?! </p>
<p>Thanks for contributing to the conversation!</p>
<p>Plus, it let me know what CAPTCHA meant, (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) &#8212; That&#8217;s a mouth full!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzmonster</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has release a free CAPTCHA what is partnered with petfinder.com called Asirra. http://research.microsoft.com/asirra/ It's much more user friendly, and allergy-free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has release a free CAPTCHA what is partnered with&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://petfinder.com" title="http://petfinder. " target="_blank"&gt;petfinder.com&lt;/a&gt; called Asirra.&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://research.microsoft.com/asirra/" title="http://research.microsoft.com/asirra/" target="_blank"&gt;http://research.microsoft.com/asirra/&lt;/a&gt; It&#8217;s much more user friendly, and allergy-free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooklynegg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooklynegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Agreed. That is quite ugly and unreadable.  I have seen simpler ones that have real letters with a line through them that I assume would make them unreadable to a spambot. You "organic" example is truly ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. That is quite ugly and unreadable.  I have seen simpler ones that have real letters with a line through them that I assume would make them unreadable to a spambot. You &#8220;organic&#8221; example is truly ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jlees</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jlees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Yes, those are my favorites as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, those are my favorites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrentSheets</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>BrentSheets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/vbscript-systems-administrator/rant-anyone-else-dislike-those-enter-the-letters-you-see-below-confirmation-pages/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Haha. Jerry, I know just what you mean. I understand the need for spam prevention but some CAPTCHA are simply unreadable to me. I've always liked the silly little "Is fire hot or cold?" or "2 + 2 =" type spam preventers instead. They seem quicker and at least you can read the darn things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. Jerry, I know just what you mean. I understand the need for spam prevention but some CAPTCHA are simply unreadable to me. I&#8217;ve always liked the silly little &#8220;Is fire hot or cold?&#8221; or &#8220;2 + 2 =" type spam preventers instead. They seem quicker and at least you can read the darn things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->