Uncharted Waters

Dec 28 2016   1:07PM GMT

Do you Even Lift: Goals for 2017 and Beyond

Matt Heusser Matt Heusser Profile: Matt Heusser

Tags:
Agile
budget
improvement
Metrics
PMP
Project management
schedule

A few years ago I visited a company in West Michigan that had graphs on all the walls. Graphs everywhere; very impressive.

Then I looked at one.

It was a percentage on on-time project delivery chart for the past year – and it looked something like this:

Do you even lift graph of project success (all 100% for a year)

The typical response to this is probably either excitement (they are doing the best humanly possible!) or disbelief, or perhaps, a small chance the company actually managed to hit dates by cutting scope. My response was a little different.

I saw waste.

The Trouble With Perfection

The probability curve for a typical project looks something like this:

Do you even lift Probability Curve of projects

At the far left of the curve we have the land of “isn’t going to happen”, up until you hit about a 10% chance of success. From 10% or so, the real choice of management is how much confidence to have in the project deliverables. Confidence costs money.

If I see a program running 10 simultaneous projects, with fifty projects a year, and they are all on time, it means the projects are probably padded out to the 90% percentile – or beyond.

Some of the projects could have been scheduled for less time.

If we only saw a few late projects – a ten percent dip here or there – we’d know the company was planning things aggressively.

Some of my management consultant friends would say that adding in time for morale, for R&D, and to respond to emergencies is a good thing. Others might point out that perhaps this could be a contracting company, with large bonuses for being on-time and penalties for being late. There certainly are business contexts where the positive benefits of being on-time outweigh the waste of excess padding.

But let’s be honest.

None of that was happening here.

And if you don’t push yourself, you get fat and lazy.

Failure As A Good Thing In Action

This October I started a weight lifting program called StrongLift 5×5. Every week, three times a week, I do three exercises, a combination of squats, overhead press, bench press, barbell row, and the dead lift. I do five sets of five repetitions, for each of the three exercises. Every time I succeed with the weight, the software adds five more pounds for my next routine.

After just two months, my metrics look like this:Do you even lift - Stronglift graph

The only line that is going down is the red one – my weight.

The most interesting line is probably the purple one, the overhead press. I have reached muscle failure twice on the overhead press. That means I could not complete the assigned weight. Two or three days later, I am back in the gym, trying to do the same weight. If fail a few times in a row, the software will de-load the weight for me.

In Plain English

The only way for me to see serious gains in the gym is by pushing myself to my limits, seeing myself fail, learning from it, then trying again.

My problem with the “perfect” team is that they were not pushing themselves to failure. I could do the same thing in the gym right now – I could overhead press 45 pounds 5×5 every day, easily … but I would not gain muscle strength. In fact, at this point, I would probably see muscle loss.

The combination of an actual plan for improvement, strong numerical goals, and a willingness to improve myself had me dead lifting more than my body weight as a multi-rep routine (not a one-time “personal record”), early in December, with nothing but gains from there.

Of course, that was holistic, I had to fix my diet and my sleep too. The point is to have a plan, push yourself, and have some way to measure it.

As we start to look at 2017, it might be worth considering. 

Tomorrow

Samuel Beckett, the 20th century novelist, is credited with this little gem:

“Ever tried.

Ever failed.

No matter.

Try Again.

Fail Again.

Fail Better.”

In 1969, Beckett earned the Nobel Prize in Literature, equivalent to a few million US Dollars today. In typical fashion, he gave the money away, and kept writing.

Whatever you are doing in 2017, set a goal to do more of it. If you reach muscle failure, that is okay. Just keep doing it.

Don’t aim for 100% and make sure the goal is easy – Aim for 100% of better.

1  Comment on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.
  • jruberto
    Matt,

    The failure rate reminds me about how we track innovation projects on my team. We encourage our team members to try new things, a new tool or a new practice. If the Proof of Concept (POC) succeeds, and we adopt the innovation and call it a success.
    We target a 50% success rate. If every POC succeeds, we aren't trying hard enough. If every POC fails, we aren't being mindful with our time.
    Hitting exactly 50% isn't important. What is important is trying new things, even if some of them don't work out. ("work out", see what I did there?)

    Thanks,

    John
    20 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

Share this item with your network: