 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncommon Wisdom &#187; telecom networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/tag/telecom-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom</link>
	<description>A SearchCloudProvider.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:46:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Verizon CEO eyes fiber-fueled future sans &#8216;voice-only&#8217; service</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/verizon-ceo-eyes-fiber-fueled-future-sans-voice-only-service/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/verizon-ceo-eyes-fiber-fueled-future-sans-voice-only-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber to the home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FiOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Seidenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon FiOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/?p=1490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verizon CEO Ivan G. Seidenberg is no shrinking violet, as we all know. His recent comments on the company&#8217;s plans suggest that Verizon is essentially dividing residential customers into &#8220;video-potential&#8221; and &#8220;voice-only&#8221; categories and trying to sell off geographies where the latter would be the rule. DSL has limited potential for exploitation because copper loop [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verizon CEO Ivan G. Seidenberg is <a href="../../telecom-timeout-blog/verizon-ceo-comes-out-swinging-against-net-neutrality/">no shrinking violet</a>, as we all know. His <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5izxL5a2Uu6B6v1cYB8Gr5cNXs3rgD9FHIEJO1">recent comments</a> on the company&#8217;s plans suggest that Verizon is essentially dividing residential customers into &#8220;video-potential&#8221; and &#8220;voice-only&#8221; categories and trying to sell off geographies where the latter would be the rule.</p>
<p>DSL has limited potential for exploitation because copper loop is limited, and Seidenberg is singing the praises of <a href="http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,290660,sid7_gci1220389,00.html">fiber to the home</a> (FTTH). The challenge for Verizon is that, due in part to high costs, they <a href="http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid103_gci1512793,00.html">can&#8217;t provide FTTH to everyone</a>. Seidenberg also talked a lot about wireless, which leaves one wondering if Verizon is planning to sell off areas where copper wireline is the only option, focus on fiber where FiOS can penetrate, and let voice go to either wireless or to competitors. Changes to universal service to subsidize broadband might be a workable alternative, but it sure looks like the phone companies have decided that phones alone aren&#8217;t going to cut it for the future.</p>
<p>Whether copper-loop customers in areas that Verizon can&#8217;t sell off would eventually lose service is a question nobody can answer at this point. But it&#8217;s our view that Verizon is planning ways to cut the cord for these customers, moving them to mobile service to reduce infrastructure spending.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/verizon-ceo-eyes-fiber-fueled-future-sans-voice-only-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Service-layer evolution: Pushing for vendor support</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/service-layer-evolution-pushing-for-vendor-support/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/service-layer-evolution-pushing-for-vendor-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nolle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OTT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service layer architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service oriented network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ATIS, a body driven primarily by the service providers, has announced its own initiative for what it calls the Service Oriented Network or SON. While nobody is positioning this explicitly as a repudiation of either the vendor support for the service layer or standards progress in defining standards there, we’re hearing that it’s both. Operators [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.atis.org/about.shtml">ATIS</a>, a body driven primarily by the service providers, has announced its own initiative for what it calls the Service Oriented Network or SON. While nobody is positioning this explicitly as a repudiation of either the vendor support for the service layer or standards progress in defining standards there, we’re hearing that it’s both.</p>
<p>Operators have been disenchanted with the response of vendors to their pressure to develop flexible solutions for hosted service features to let them compete better with OTT players. They’ve also been unhappy with the debate and dallying in the standards area. Now they are apparently launching a thinly veiled threat to drive the process themselves.</p>
<p>We’ve also heard that at least two and as many as four vendors will announce <a href="http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid103_gci1363873,00.html">service-layer strategies/products</a> this fall.</p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/service-layer-evolution-pushing-for-vendor-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
