 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet traffic growth could be $150 billion problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/internet-traffic-growth-could-be-150-billion-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/internet-traffic-growth-could-be-150-billion-problem/</link>
	<description>A SearchCloudProvider.com blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacomo</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/internet-traffic-growth-could-be-150-billion-problem/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/telecom/internet-traffic-growth-could-be-150-billion-problem/#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Mr. Nolle, without financial rewards there is little incentive to build out these backbones.
However, If one looks at how Google is positioning itself Nationwide US (today-World near term) with their data Centers interconnected by fiber and managed end to end with low latency &amp; QoS, one sees a subsitute for much high volume Broabdnad traffic that will be routed over their backbone to their in house Content/Hosting Applications etc.
All they are missing YTD, is access to the Last Mile Pipes, which they will address either with their 700Mhz Bid (assuming they win a nationwide license) or via a simple Fiber Link to most service providers as a replacement for or complemment to their Dual Home Internet (Tier#1) links.
WIth Ad revenue share and very high quality Broadband links to Google based and other  Worldwide Content/Apps, they will eventually dominate much of the Web activity.
As a Service Provider we&#039;d welcome an opprtunity to work with Google and provide (at our cost) a dedicated Fiber Link to their local Data Centers
and allow them access to our local customer base with premium level Services.

Jacomo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Nolle, without financial rewards there is little incentive to build out these backbones.<br />
However, If one looks at how Google is positioning itself Nationwide US (today-World near term) with their data Centers interconnected by fiber and managed end to end with low latency &amp; QoS, one sees a subsitute for much high volume Broabdnad traffic that will be routed over their backbone to their in house Content/Hosting Applications etc.<br />
All they are missing YTD, is access to the Last Mile Pipes, which they will address either with their 700Mhz Bid (assuming they win a nationwide license) or via a simple Fiber Link to most service providers as a replacement for or complemment to their Dual Home Internet (Tier#1) links.<br />
WIth Ad revenue share and very high quality Broadband links to Google based and other  Worldwide Content/Apps, they will eventually dominate much of the Web activity.<br />
As a Service Provider we&#8217;d welcome an opprtunity to work with Google and provide (at our cost) a dedicated Fiber Link to their local Data Centers<br />
and allow them access to our local customer base with premium level Services.</p>
<p>Jacomo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
