<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lotus Notes to Sharepoint Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/system-i/lotus-notes-to-sharepoint-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/system-i/lotus-notes-to-sharepoint-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kmpgmr</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/system-i/lotus-notes-to-sharepoint-blog/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Kmpgmr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/system-i/?p=271#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Amen to that!!  Now, if you wanted to compare Sharepoint to Quickr, you may be on to something, but comparing Sharepoint to all that Lotus Notes / Domino offers makes no sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!!  Now, if you wanted to compare Sharepoint to Quickr, you may be on to something, but comparing Sharepoint to all that Lotus Notes / Domino offers makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->