<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware vs. Partners: chatter about conflict increases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/vmware-vs-partners-chatter-about-conflict-increases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/vmware-vs-partners-chatter-about-conflict-increases/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Conniff</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/vmware-vs-partners-chatter-about-conflict-increases/#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Conniff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/03/11/vmware-vs-partners-chatter-about-conflict-increases/#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>What storage vendors in particular were not happy about Storage Vmotion?  Certainly not an enterprise approach to pooh pooh SVM, as it does address a need that really isn't competitive to an enterprise storage virtualization strategy, or at least a non-array based storage virtualization strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What storage vendors in particular were not happy about Storage Vmotion?  Certainly not an enterprise approach to pooh pooh SVM, as it does address a need that really isn&#8217;t competitive to an enterprise storage virtualization strategy, or at least a non-array based storage virtualization strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->