 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Linux effect on storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: yfeefy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>yfeefy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/06/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author makes the common mistake that enterprises run only windows and linux. Of course this is false, and they will need backup applications that can handle the above, as well as the various vendor supplied UNIX systems, OpenVMS, tandem, mainframe, as/400, etc... 

I&#039;m pretty sure there is no one &#039;enterprise backup solution&#039; that can handle all of the above. If it&#039;s possible for an application to be quiesced/frozen while a storage array snapshot it taken, the snapshot can be backed up (a number of ways) block for block, which can be good for quick easy image backup/bare metal recovery. We&#039;ll still probably need more than one file-based/application-based backup, in addition to this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author makes the common mistake that enterprises run only windows and linux. Of course this is false, and they will need backup applications that can handle the above, as well as the various vendor supplied UNIX systems, OpenVMS, tandem, mainframe, as/400, etc&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure there is no one &#8216;enterprise backup solution&#8217; that can handle all of the above. If it&#8217;s possible for an application to be quiesced/frozen while a storage array snapshot it taken, the snapshot can be backed up (a number of ways) block for block, which can be good for quick easy image backup/bare metal recovery. We&#8217;ll still probably need more than one file-based/application-based backup, in addition to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/06/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a storage consultant I have to admit I&#039;m seeing more and more Linux in the enterprise datacenters.  A recent client, a well established telecom provider, used a 32 node SAN attached bladecenter environment running SUSE Linux as it&#039;s primary OS.  I was impressed by the ease of configuration and at the same time how deep the configuration detail could go.  

As far as the comment above about Linux being a &quot;Windows Wannabe&quot; - I beg to differ.  I&#039;ve been in a position to hire linux engineers as well as windows, and the one thing I can definitively say about the difference is that Windows engineers are really good at following procedures and whitepapers, but often fold when the time comes to troubleshoot/think creatively.  This is the result of M$ engineers having a severly myopic view of the world.  If it&#039;s not Microsoft, it&#039;s not worth knowing.  

Linux engineers on the other hand want to know as much as they can about as much as they can.

When it comes time to hire a windows person, I will often toss the resume of anyone who puts MCP/MCSE etc, directly into the trash, and instead look for a Linux/Unix engineer who also knows windows.  That way I&#039;m getting someone who learns and grows beyond their original programming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a storage consultant I have to admit I&#8217;m seeing more and more Linux in the enterprise datacenters.  A recent client, a well established telecom provider, used a 32 node SAN attached bladecenter environment running SUSE Linux as it&#8217;s primary OS.  I was impressed by the ease of configuration and at the same time how deep the configuration detail could go.  </p>
<p>As far as the comment above about Linux being a &#8220;Windows Wannabe&#8221; &#8211; I beg to differ.  I&#8217;ve been in a position to hire linux engineers as well as windows, and the one thing I can definitively say about the difference is that Windows engineers are really good at following procedures and whitepapers, but often fold when the time comes to troubleshoot/think creatively.  This is the result of M$ engineers having a severly myopic view of the world.  If it&#8217;s not Microsoft, it&#8217;s not worth knowing.  </p>
<p>Linux engineers on the other hand want to know as much as they can about as much as they can.</p>
<p>When it comes time to hire a windows person, I will often toss the resume of anyone who puts MCP/MCSE etc, directly into the trash, and instead look for a Linux/Unix engineer who also knows windows.  That way I&#8217;m getting someone who learns and grows beyond their original programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MS</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/06/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linux is such a Windows wannabe.  Good job on using a &quot;free&quot; OS to save a bit of dollars and then you have to hire seperate support people who don&#039;t work well with others and the OS has no reliabilty without relying on Windows wannabe drivers.  LOL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux is such a Windows wannabe.  Good job on using a &#8220;free&#8221; OS to save a bit of dollars and then you have to hire seperate support people who don&#8217;t work well with others and the OS has no reliabilty without relying on Windows wannabe drivers.  LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AD</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6764</link>
		<dc:creator>AD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/08/06/the-linux-effect-on-storage/#comment-6764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very interesting. i never thought Linux would be this popular.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting. i never thought Linux would be this popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
