 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Storage Soup &#187; scale-up storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/tag/scale-up-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<copyright>2009 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>bpariseau@techtarget.com (SearchStorage.com)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>bpariseau@techtarget.com (SearchStorage.com)</webMaster>
	<category>Technology</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle>A SearchStorage.com podcast</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>A SearchStorage.com podcast covering the top stories in enterprise data storage from week to week, also featuring interviews with industry experts. </itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>data storage, cloud storage, data backup, Data center disaster recovery planning, Data center energy efficiency, data compliance and archiving, data compliance and archiving; data migration; storage vendors, data deduplication, data reduction, data security, Data storage management, disk drive, disk drives, e-Discovery, Editorial process, ESX Server, Flash storage, iSCSI, iSCSI SAN, NAS, Online Backup, SAN, small business storage, software as a service, solid state drives, Storage, Storage and server virtualization, Storage backup, Storage conferences, storage headlines, Storage managed service providers, Storage market research reports, Storage protocols, storage service providers, Storage software as a service, storage technology research, Storage tips, storage vendors, storage virtualization, Strategic storage vendors, tape data storage, VMware, WAN Optimization / WAFS</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Tech News" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Technology" />
	<itunes:category text="Technology">
		<itunes:category text="Podcasting" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>SearchStorage.com</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>SearchStorage.com</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>bpariseau@techtarget.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://media.techtarget.com/digitalguide/images/podcast/Storage_Soup_podcast_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Scale-out vs. scale-up: the basics</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/scale-out-vs-scale-up-the-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/scale-out-vs-scale-up-the-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randy Kerns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scale-out storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scale-up storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/?p=8404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about scale-out and scale-up storage lately, and I get a sense that a lot of people don&#8217;t understand that these terms are not synonymous. And that causes confusion among IT professionals when they are planning product purchases and trying to determine how these types of products bring value versus [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: Arial;font-size: small">There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about <a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/magazineFeature/0,296894,sid5_gci1525655,00.html">scale-out </a>and <a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/magazineFeature/0,296894,sid5_gci1393686,00.html">scale-up</a> storage lately, and I get a sense that a lot of people don&#8217;t understand that these terms are not synonymous. And that causes confusion among IT professionals when they are planning product purchases and trying to determine how these types of products bring value versus cost and complexity to their environments.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">To make informed buying decisions, IT pros need to understand the difference between scale-up and scale-out. The following are the basics, which can be built upon for more detailed considerations. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">Scale-up, as the following simple diagram shows, is taking an existing storage system and adding capacity to meet increased capacity demands.<span>  </span><span>  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale1.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8414" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale1.gif" alt="" width="491" height="209" /></a> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">Scale-up can solve a capacity problem without adding infrastructure elements such as network connectivity. However, it does require additional space, power, and cooling. Scaling up does not add controller capabilities to handle additional host activities. That means it doesn’t add costs for extra control functions either.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">So the costs have not scaled at the same rate for the initial storage system plus storage devices – only additional devices have been added. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">Scale-out storage usually requires additional storage (called nodes) to add capacity and performance. Or in the case of monolithic storage systems, it scales by adding more functional elements (usually controller cards).One difference between scaling out and just putting more storage systems on the floor is that scale-out storage continues to be represented as a single system.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">There are several methods for accomplishing scale out, including <a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid5_gci1518161,00.html">clustered storage </a>systems and grid storage. The definitions of these two types can also be confusing, and other factors add to the complexity (that’s a subject for another article), but the fundamental premise is that a scale-out solution is accessed as a single system.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">This diagram shows an example of a scale-out storage solution. In this diagram, the scaling is only with an additional node but a scale-out solution could have many nodes that are interconnected across geographical distances. <span> </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"><span><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale2.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8415" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale2.gif" alt="" width="426" height="237" /></a></span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;margin: 0in 0in 0pt" align="center"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">The scale-out storage in this example added both the control function and capacity but maintained a single system representation for access. This scaling may have required additional infrastructure such as storage switches to connect the storage to the controller and a connection between the nodes in the cluster or grid. These connections let the solution work as a single system.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">Scaling-out adds power, cooling, and space requirements, and the cost includes the additional capacity, control elements and infrastructure.<span>  </span>With the scale-out solution in this example, capacity increased and performance scaled with the additional control capabilities. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">Not all scaling solutions are so simple. Many storage systems can scale out and up. The following diagram illustrates this: </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" align="center"><a href="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale3.gif"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-8417" src="http://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/ITKE/uploads/blogs.dir/94/files/2011/02/scale3.gif" alt="" width="341" height="262" /></a></p>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><strong>Considerations</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>When looking at scale-up or scale-out storage, consider these factors: </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span> </span></p>
<ul>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>Costs Scale up adds capacity but not the controller or infrastructure costs. <span> </span>If the measure is dollar per GB, scale-up will be less expensive. </span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>Capacity. Either solution can meet capacity requirements but there may be a limit on the scale-up capacity based on how much capacity or how many devices an individual storage controller can attach. </span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>Performance. Scale out has the potential capability to aggregate IOPS and bandwidth of multiple storage controllers. Representing the nodes as a single system may introduce latency, but this is implementation specific. </span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>M</span><span>anagement. Scale up would have a single storage system management characterization. Scale-out systems typically have an aggregated management capability but there may be variations between vendor offerings. </span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>Complexity. Scale-up storage is expected to be simple, while scale-out systems may be more<span> </span>complex because they require elements to manage. </span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span>Availability. Additional nodes should provide greater availability in case one element fails or goes out of service. This depends on the particular implementation. </span></div>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small">There is a great deal to consider when making a choice between <a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/video/Expert-video-Scale-up-vs-scale-out-storage-explained">scale out and scale up</a>. The decision will ultimately depend on how one vendor implements its solution and its capabilities and features compared to another vendor. But, it is always best to start with a basic understanding and then look at the differences.<span>  </span><span> </span></span></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span><span style="font-size: small"> </span></span></p>
<!-- wpms-network-global-inserts -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/scale-out-vs-scale-up-the-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
