 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSDs vs. 20,000 rpm drives: Who wins? I do!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives-who-wins-i-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives-who-wins-i-do/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Tory Skyers</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives-who-wins-i-do/#comment-7154</link>
		<dc:creator>Tory Skyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/10/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives/#comment-7154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Western Digital VelociRaptor does a good job of putting the notion that SATA isn&#039;t a performance oriented disk technology to bed. Based on the benchmarks at storagereview.com the VelociRaptor is on par with 10k RPM SAS drives. Also check out the comments on one of my older blog posts about Windows and SAS, there is a very in depth dialog about that very same topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Western Digital VelociRaptor does a good job of putting the notion that SATA isn&#8217;t a performance oriented disk technology to bed. Based on the benchmarks at storagereview.com the VelociRaptor is on par with 10k RPM SAS drives. Also check out the comments on one of my older blog posts about Windows and SAS, there is a very in depth dialog about that very same topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives-who-wins-i-do/#comment-7153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/06/10/ssds-vs-20000-rpm-drives/#comment-7153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yo, SAS and SATA are complementary technologies.  They both address different ends of the value chain: SAS = high performance, SATA = high capacity.  Never the two shall meet, hence they be complimentary.  Get it straight!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, SAS and SATA are complementary technologies.  They both address different ends of the value chain: SAS = high performance, SATA = high capacity.  Never the two shall meet, hence they be complimentary.  Get it straight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
