 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogue shadow IT poses security risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/rogue-shadow-it-poses-security-risks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/rogue-shadow-it-poses-security-risks/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/rogue-shadow-it-poses-security-risks/#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/?p=10698#comment-8354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The survey found that 54% of respondents work at organizations that do not allow access to file sharing.
&#160;
That seems to mean either that the restriction is only in policy or that there is no clear method of enforcing the restriction through automated controls.
&#160;
If it&#039;s only in policy, then it also implies that there is no effective monitoring and that there are no visible consequences of violating policy. It implies that &lt;STRONG&gt;any&lt;/STRONG&gt; policy violation might have no consequence, even ones not related to IT.
&#160;
If it&#039;s because automated controls aren&#039;t feasible, it implies that systems are dangerously vulnerable to outside, unauthorized access.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The survey found that 54% of respondents work at organizations that do not allow access to file sharing.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
That seems to mean either that the restriction is only in policy or that there is no clear method of enforcing the restriction through automated controls.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
If it&#8217;s only in policy, then it also implies that there is no effective monitoring and that there are no visible consequences of violating policy. It implies that <strong>any</strong> policy violation might have no consequence, even ones not related to IT.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
If it&#8217;s because automated controls aren&#8217;t feasible, it implies that systems are dangerously vulnerable to outside, unauthorized access.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
