Storage Soup


May 29, 2009  8:15 AM

05-28-2009 Storage Headlines

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

(0:25) Hewlett-Packard launches Windows 2008-based multiprotocol data storage system for SMBs
(2:18) Riverbed Technology’s Steelhead and Autodesk’s AutoCAD resolve file compatibility problem
(3:58) Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) adds High Availability Manager (HAM) to USP V controllers
(5:11) Sun releases cluster array
(6:17) MA court says Donatelli can start work for HP

May 28, 2009  10:02 PM

SunGard to open arms – and data centers – to healthcare IT

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Washington D.C. isn’t the only place where people are paying a lot of attention to healthcare these days. The IT world sees healthcare as a soon-to-be booming market, thanks to billions of dollars set aside for electronic healthcare records and procedures in this year’s economic stimulus bill. So it’s no surprise that vendors are positioning themselves to ride the coming wave of digitization in the healthcare field.

SunGard Availability Services is among those making a big push into healthcare. This week it revealed a partnership with IT outsource provider PhoenixHealth Systems to offer data center outsourcing for hospitals, and it will soon launch a service for archiving medical images based on a partnership with InSiteOne Inc.

The InSiteOne-based service, called Secure to Disk, will include compression, encryption, deduplication, audit trails, and content addressing specifically for secure, compliant storage of medical images. The partnership with PhoenixHealth is for hospitals and healthcare centers looking to outsource the entire data center, with a focus on application delivery and availability, although data storage and disaster recovery features are also part of that service.

Glenn Boland, national vice president of healthcare for SunGard Availability Services, says the two services might also be combined in a hybrid public-private cloud - the InSiteOne service would use a shared infrastructure, while services offered through PhoenixHealth use a dedicated infrastructure that the customer must supply or contract for.

SunGard and competitors such as Iron Mountain and HP feel hospitals are especially good candidates to outsource processes such as DR and online archiving services because many hospitals prefer to focus on core medical competencies.

“Even institutions that feel they can house applications better, faster and cheaper in-house are probably taking a harder and harder look at where they spend their storage dollars,” Boland says.


May 26, 2009  7:13 PM

MA court says Donatelli can start work for HP *Updated*

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

According to a press release put out by Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) today, a Massachusetts court has ruled that former EMC storage division head Dave Donatelli can start work for HP, provided he doesn’t oversee storage.

The statement from HP reads:

HP today announced that the Suffolk County Superior Court of Massachusetts entered an order that allows David Donatelli to begin working at the company.

This order modifies an earlier ruling by the court temporarily prohibiting Donatelli’s employment by HP.

Donatelli will serve as executive vice president of Enterprise Servers and Networking. Due to certain restrictions in the court’s most recent order, Dave Roberson, senior vice president and general manager of the StorageWorks division, will report directly to Ann Livermore, executive vice president of the Technology Solutions Group at HP, until the order is lifted.

HP is pleased with the court’s recent decision and looks forward to the contributions Donatelli will make to HP’s business.

As a 22-year veteran of EMC who ran a $14.9 billion division, Donatelli surprised the storage world by accepting a position with HP in late April. Earlier this month, the Massachusetts court blocked Donatelli from starting work at HP until the dispute over a non-compete clause in his contract with EMC was settled.

EMC officials have yet to respond to requests for comment on this latest ruling today.

Update: An EMC spokesperson just sent the following statement:

“We are pleased with the court’s ruling upholding the terms of EMC’s key employee agreement. The judge entered an order as proposed by EMC that precludes Mr. Donatelli from being engaged in any aspect of HP’s business that overlaps or competes with EMC’s storage business for a 12-month period.”


May 26, 2009  4:10 PM

Broadcom looks to unseat Emulex board

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Photobucket
Emulex shareholders must make a choice…

Just in case you thought Broadcom was playing around with its hostile takeover bid for Emulex, yet another notice put out by Emulex today highlights another tactic Broadcom is using – an attempt to get shareholders to unseat Emulex’s board of directors, replacing them with a board that would be more receptive to Broadcom’s $9.25 / share tender offer.

Shareholders have now received two cards – a gold one and a white one. Signing the white one works in Emulex’s favor; if enough investors sign the gold card, the board could be threatened with replacement. Not surprisingly, Emulex said in a letter to shareholders this morning, “We Urge You to NOT Tender Your Shares into Broadcom’s Grossly Inadequate Offer and NOT to Sign a Gold Consent Solicitation Card from Broadcom. Please Sign and Return Our WHITE Card When You Receive It” (capitalization in the original).

The ball is in Emulex shareholders’ court. Will they stick with Emulex’s current management, or take the gold pill, and see how deep the rabbit hole goes?

Broadcom’s offer to Emulex shareholders expires June 3.


May 26, 2009  4:07 PM

HDS’s anagrammatic announcement

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Hitachi Data Systems has put out a brain-teaser for storage industry watchers in anticipation of announcing a new system on a webcast scheduled for tomorrow. HDS CTO of Storage Architectures Claus Mikkelsen posted an anagram on his blog of the technology HDS will be making noise about tomorrow – REGRADES OUR CLASSY TREAT.

U.K. storage consultant Chris M. Evans solved the puzzle on his blog with STORAGE ARRAYS CLUSTERED or CLUSTERED STORAGE ARRAYS, although the ever-cheeky Register has a few more “adventurous” suggestions.

Here are a couple more, courtesy of Wordsmith.org:

  1. A Lacerated Grosser Yurts
  2. A Declaratory Egress Ruts
  3. A Daycares Legs Torturers
  4. A Carloads Regrets Surety
  5. A Caldera Rogers Yet Rusts

Let us know if you’ve come up with any more good ones in the comments.


May 22, 2009  11:28 AM

Xiotech resizes Emprise self-healing disk array, says SSDs on roadmap

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Xiotech has rolled out a smaller entry-level configuration of its Emprise 7000 array, targeting branch offices and the midmarket. The single-controller Emprise 7000 Edge supports up to 10 of what Xiotech calls Intelligent Storage Elements (ISE), for a total maximum capacity of 160 TB.

Xiotech product management director Eric Lomascolo says the 7000 Edge also has a direct upgrade path to the dual-controller enterprise Emprise 7000, which supports up to 64 ISE for up to 1024 TB.

Xiotech also sells the Emprise 5000, a direct-attached storage (DAS) box, which users can stack to expand capacity. However, according to Lomascolo, the 7000 series includes software features not found in the 5000, including replication, which can be applied to the entire SAN from a single management point. Each 5000 unit has to be managed separately.

Xiotech has yet to add solid-state drive support to Emprise, but Lomascolo said it’s on the roadmap and Xiotech will consider hybrid as well as purely solid-state offerings. Another trend among disk array vendors has been the development of software for automatic placement of data on SSDs according to performance needs, but Lomascolo said it’s low on the priority list for Xiotech users. “It’s absolutely something we’ll make available, and today you can move data around with integration through our Web services interface,” Lomascolo said. “But what we’ve seen so far from feature functionality surveys is that’s at the bottom of what users really care about.”


May 22, 2009  8:15 AM

05-21-2009 Storage Headlines

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Please excuse my voice this week, battling a cold.

Stories referenced:

(0:25) NetApp acquires data deduplication specialist Data Domain for $1.5 billion

(2:15) EMC Corp. reveals storage automation plans at EMC World 2009
EMC World Reporter’s Notebook

(5:31) EMC, AT&T open up Atmos-based cloud storage services

(7:03) IBM writes software to improve data placement on solid-state drives

(9:02) Sun tweaks tape platform while waiting for Oracle to take over


May 21, 2009  5:25 PM

NetApp looks to get one right

Dave Raffo Dave Raffo Profile: Dave Raffo

Like all large acquisitions, NetApp’s $1.5 billion purchase of Data Domain leaves a few lingering questions in its wake.

The first is, will this be another acquisition that blows up in NetApp’s face? Let’s face it, NetApp hasn’t hit any home runs in past pickups. A quick look at its track record shows NetApp:

• bought Spinnaker for $300 million five-and-half years ago, and still hasn’t fully integrated the code into its Data OnTap operating system.

• paid $272 million for Decru in 2005, only to be frustrated when the appliance-based encryption market never developed.

• acquired Topio for $160 million in 2006, and discontinued selling its heterogeneous replication software at the end of last year.

NetApp president Tom Georgens is quick to point out the 2008 acquisition of Onaro for $100 million has worked out. Georgens says the SANScreen SRM software NetApp got from Onaro has sold well above expectations in the first year since the deal.

But even counting Onaro as a hit still leaves NetApp with a poor average with acquisitions.

NetApp CEO Dan Warmenhoven found himself on the defensive on the NetApp earnings call Wednesday night when asked about previous acquisitions. “Spinnaker was completely integration — we tried to fuse together two separate technologies,” he said. “That was a much harder problem than we anticipated going in. Decru had a little bit different outcome. While I agree with you it was not to the fulfillment of our expectations, I think it was because we saw that market shift much faster than we thought.”

Neither of those problems should arise with Data Domain, though. The dedupe market is clearly established and growing, and Data Domain has led the charge. No integration is necessary in this case. There may be some integration down the road, but NetApp can sell the Data Domain dedupe boxes while it develops future products. Unlike Spinnaker, Decru and Topio, Data Domain is a public company. It has a strong organization and an accomplished sales force. And as Warmenhoven points out, NetApp already knows how to sell software wrapped in commodity hardware. The odds look good for NetApp in this case.

Another question in the wake of the deal is, will the ripple effects result in more acquisitions? It is sure to renew speculation that EMC will buy out its dedupe partner Quantum, but EMC already has the only thing from Quantum that it wants – its dedupe code. Why should it buy the entire company, unless another suitor forces it into a defensive deal?

The more likely deal would be Hewlett-Packard and Sepaton. HP already sells Sepaton’s dedupe and VTL software, and has a track record of buying companies following successful OEM relationships.

Regardless of what happens next, NetApp’s deal has made a hot tech area even more interesting.


May 20, 2009  8:38 PM

NetApp drops $1.5 billion for Data Domain

Dave Raffo Dave Raffo Profile: Dave Raffo

Well, NetApp found a way to make money off data deduplication without charging for its primary deduplication licenses.

NetApp acquired Data Domain today for $1.5 billion, giving it the top dedupe revenue-producing product platform after the deal closes in about two to four months.

Earlier this week, NetApp issued a release saying 7,200 customers were using its dedupe for more than 37,000 systems. But those customers aren’t paying for dedupe because NetApp doesn’t charge for dedupe licenses for its primary storage. It does sell virtual tape libraries (VTLs) with separate dedupe licenses, but that platform will likely be phased out now that NetApp has Data Domain’s product line.

NetApp paid $25 per share in cash and stock for Data Domain, well above the $18.08 price Data Domain opened at today.

NetApp and Data Domain both count EMC as their largest competitor, and this will intensify the NetApp-EMC competition. EMC licenses Quantum’s deduplication software for its Disk Library family, and also offers host-based deduplication with its Avamar software. EMC recently moved to challenge NetApp in primary dedupe by adding single instance capability to its Celerra NAS platform.

See our story on SearchStorage for more details.


May 20, 2009  7:57 PM

Photos from EMC World

Beth Pariseau Beth Pariseau Profile: Beth Pariseau

Photobucket
The decor theme at the Welcome Reception Sunday night seemed to be “art-deco tropical.”

Photobucket
View of the Gin Blossoms concert from behind the VIP Lounge.

Photobucket
The Gin Blossoms perform on a screen (top / foreground) and onstage (bottom / background).

Photobucket
Attendees take in the Gin Blossoms concert at the Welcome Reception Sunday night.

Photobucket
The Gin Blossoms’ lead singer, Robin Wilson, stands on the drum kit (center-right) during the band’s performance.

Photobucket
It’s just not a tech trade show without blinking LED trinkets. This year, they were at the bottom of Brocade-themed beer glasses.
Photobucket
The Gin Blossoms’ Robin Wilson performs.

Photobucket
Monday morning – a stampede for the show floor just after it opened.

Photobucket
Hard at work inside the Bloggers’ Lounge.

Photobucket
View of the funky exterior of the Bloggers’ Lounge.

Photobucket
Orlando, I discovered on this trip, is not a walking city. Technically, the Orange County Convention Center was across the street from our hotel, but ‘across the street’ means something different in Orlando than Boston or New York – in this case the street was a six-lane divided highway. Also, the fact that we could see part of the OCCC from the hotel didn’t mean the conference was necessarily close by – the structure (or group of structures) is so enormous we had to be bussed a few blocks to get to the right concourse. Once inside, the scale didn’t seem to get much smaller. Needless to say, by this time Monday afternoon I was pretty jealous of the OCCC staff who were jetting around on Segways.

Photobucket
EMC directors’ chairs, ready for executives’ closeups.

Photobucket
EMC’s Rich Napolitano, Mark Sorenson and Brian Gallagher at a panel session with press Monday afternoon. 

Photobucket
Dual controllers: VMware CEO Paul Maritz (left) and EMC CEO Joe Tucci (right) field questions from press on Monday.

Photobucket
VCE reps Chuck Hollis of EMC, Ed Bugnion of Cisco and Parag Patal of VMware host a roundtable discussion with press Tuesday morning.


Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: