Research firm IDC reports factory revenues for worldwide purpose-built backup appliances (PBBA) experienced solid growth in the second quarter while enterprise storage systems revenue remained flat during that same period.
Factory revenues for worldwide purpose-built backup appliances (PBBA) grew 11.5% year over year in second quarter to $871 million, according to IDC’s Worldwide Quarterly Purpose-Built Backup Appliance (PBBA) Tracker. Most of that growth came from open systems, which increased 12% to $788 million. The rest of the revenue came from backup systems for mainframes.
“After three consecutive quarters of year-over-year decline, mainframe systems revenue was up by 6.2 percent from a year ago,” according to the PBBA tracker report. “Total worldwide PBBA capacity shipped for Q2 2016 reached one exabyte, an increase of 35.3 percent from Q2 2015.”
EMC held on to its lead in the overall PBBA market, with $538 million and 62% revenue share. Veritas came in second at 13% with $116 million in revenues. IBM ranked third with $49 million (six percent) and HPE fourth with $32 million (four percent). Dell came in fifth with 3 percent market share and $25 million in revenues.
The overall picture was different for worldwide enterprise storage systems factory revenue as it posted zero year-over-year growth in the second quarter with about $9 billion in revenues, according to IDC’s worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Storage Systems Tracker. External storage systems still is the largest market but the $6 billion in sales represented flat year-over-year growth
However, total capacity shipments were up by about 13% year over year to 35 exabytes. Sales of server-based storage also were up at 10% during the quarter and accounted for almost $2.4 billion in revenue.
EMC and HPE came in at a statistical tie for the total worldwide enterprise storage systems market, accounting for 18% and 17.6% market share, respectively. (IDC considers anything less than a percentage point apart a statistical tie). EMC’s revenue dropped 5.5 percent to $1.599 million, while HPE’s business grew almost 9 percent and generated $ 1.556 million in revenue.
Dell came in third with 11% market share and increased its business by 14% year over year, generating 1 million in revenue, while IBM had 7 percent market share and lost 16 percent in year-over-year revenue, generating $600 million in overall storage revenue. NetApp came in fourth, showing a 3.2 percent decline in year-over-year in overall storage revenue growth with $595 million in revenues.
“As a single group, storage system sales by original design manufacturers, selling directly to hyperscale data center customers accounted for $9 percent of global spending during the quarter,” the report stated.
EMC was the largest external enterprise storage system supplier, accounting for 28% of worldwide revenues. All of EMC’s revenue came from external (networked) storage.
HPE and NetApp were tied for tmarket share. HPE had 10.6% share and $602 million in sales. NetApp captured 10. 5% of the worldwide market share and generated $6 million in sale.
IBM’S revenue declined about nine percent since last year and it stood fourth with $538 million, followed by Hitachi at $419 million and Dell at $395 million. Hitachi revenue grew 15% and Dell increased 10% year over year.
StorageCraft will use its new analytics technology to tell its customers to stop backing up certain data.
That’s right, the data protection vendor wants its customers to back up less. And StorageCraft’s acquisition of Gillware Online Backup from Gillware Data Services this week will help it do that.
StorageCraft’s flagship ShadowProtect SPX software backs up virtual and physical Microsoft Windows and Linux servers. It also sells Cloud Services replication software, GranularRecovery software for Exchange, and management and monitoring software.
The key piece of Gillware Online Backup is Backup Analyzer. The application can look at all of a customer’s files, suggest those that have not been backed up and which files may not need to be backed up.
StorageCraft CEO Matt Medeiros said Backup Analyzer technology will optimize ShadowProtect backups, and he expects the Gillware development team to expand its current technology.
“Knowing what you should back up can be difficult,” Medeiros said. “Backup Analyzer helps customers determine high, medium and low priority for backups. Now we can help customers intelligently tier their data.
“The storage industry wants you to believe that all data is equal. It’s not. Some companies are finding that 50 percent of their data is not even of value to the business anymore. Yet we back it up, buy more storage for it, and pay people to manage it.”
Draper, Utah-based StorageCraft sells its software through managed service providers and VARs.
The Gillware Online Backup team consists of around 30 people, mainly engineers. The acquisition brings StorageCraft’s total headcount to a bit over 350, Medeiros said. The Gillware team will stay in Madison, Wisconsin.
Gillware Data Services already resells StorageCraft software, and that partnership will continue.
StorageCraft did not disclose the sale price, but part of the $187 million equity investment that TA Associates made in StorageCraft in January will fund the deal. Medeiros joined StorageCraft from Dell SonicWall at the time of the TA Associates funding.
Zetta unveiled the latest version of its disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS) that promises data recovery in less than five minutes.
The company initially launched its DRaaS back in May 2015 to protect virtual and physical servers in the cloud. The Zetta cloud DRaaS service does not require a local appliance and allows managed service providers (MSPs) and companies to run a virtualized native network in the cloud.
Mike Grossman, Zetta’s CEO, said the latest version includes upgrades that customers have asked for since the service was initally introduced. The latest version also includes failback, automated disaster recovery testing that encompasses both backup confirmation and “bootable” servers in the cloud, and active directory integration.
“We really feel like we have learned what customers need,” said Grossman. “A lot of key pieces needed to be built. We’ve been focusing on all these things in the last year.”
Also, Zetta cloud storage built in a preconfiguration capabitilty for network, VPN and firewall configuration at the time of onboarding to the cloud. Zetta does up-front configuration of the network, firewall, VPN connectivity. The offering is priced on a monthly, per-gigabyte storage cost and the amount of RAM used.
“We are a cloud company and there are complications in network configurations,” said Grossman. “There are network configuration nuances that we have to deal with that application vendors do not. We found out that a lot of vendors don’t complete the set. Now, we are dealing with it upfront.
Zetta’s cloud DRaaS, which targets MSPs and enterprise businesses, can protect at least 100 physical or virtual servers. The DR as a service offering has built-in WAN optimization that moves up to 5 TB of data in 24 hours for backup and recovery. It’s also optimized for data sets that are up to 500 TB.
Zetta cloud DRaaS supports multiple servers, applications, native networks and heterogeneous operating system platforms. It can boot physical and virtual systems in the cloud via a virtual private network or Remote Desktop Protocol connection. It can replicate native file systems and map a local drive in the cloud to recover individual files or entire server images.
Grossman said they target small-to-medium enterprises and partners and they offer a “no-data corruption” guarantee. The management portal allows for fast configuration and a software agent does efficient and resilient transport to and from the cloud. It offers standards-based, stateless architecture, along with the ability to manage multi-tenant storage.
Kaminario Clarity will be available to any K2 customer. Kaminario has a target of the first quarter of 2017 for delivering Clarity.
Kaminario Clarity features include a quality of service that lets customers set service levels for specific types of workloads. For instance, the K2 array could prioritize small reads and writes over large ones in a transactional database to match usage patterns.
Clarity will also include a new portal customers can use to see insights into K2 performance, as well as suggestions to improve performance and capacity.
Josh Epstein, Kaminario VP of global marketing, said a future step will be to automate the service levels for applications. Kaminario intends to add Clarity agents that will integrate into specific applications, such as Oracle and Microsoft SQL databases. The agents will provide more granular metrics for those applications.
“We’re gathering statistics about the K2 and the storage ecosystem – databases, servers, networking – and providing analytics, trends and insights from across our installed base,” he said. “The analytics tell customers how to configure and optimize their storage infrastructure.”
Kaminario Clarity continues the trend of vendors providing tools that collect data from storage arrays, upload it to clouds and provide analytics reports from customers. Other cloud-based analytics include Nimble Storage Nimble InfoSight, PureStorage Pure1 Cloud Global Insight, EMC Unity CloudIQ, HPE StoreFront Remote, IBM Spectrum Control Storage Insights, and Tintri Analytics. These tools are gaining popularity with newer array models, specifically those incorporating flash.
The Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) released Swordfish, a new specification that could ease the management of storage equipment and data services in converged, hyper-converged, hyperscale and cloud environments.
The SNIA Storage Management Initiative’s Swordfish 1.0 specification aims to simplify the provisioning, monitoring and management of block, file and object storage.
For instance, the Swordfish application programming interface (API) can associate different classes of service with storage gear of varying performance levels. An IT administrator would need only to specify the class of service to allocate storage to servers and virtual machines (VMs), rather than having to specify details on the most suitable storage array.
So far, the SNIA Swordfish specification offers extensive functionality only for block and file storage. Capabilities include the provisioning with class of service as well as replication and capacity and health metrics. Object storage support is on the Swordfish roadmap.
“One of the reasons SNIA’s so interested in doing Swordfish as an extension of Redfish is that this is an industry play to wind up with a unified approach for server, storage and fabric management,” said Don Deel, chair of SNIA’s SMI governing board and NetApp’s senior standard technology.
Swordfish can work across a variety of storage network fabrics including Fibre Channel, Ethernet, SAS and PCI Express (PCIe), according to Deel.
Swordfish will eventually replace SNIA’s Storage Management Initiative Specification (SMI-S) and possibly overcome SMI-S limitations. Deel said SMI-S is an “equipment-oriented” standard that exposes what the storage gear can do. By contrast, Swordfish is a “customer-centric interface” that focuses on use cases for “what IT administrators need to do with storage in a data center on a day-to-day basis,” Deel said.
“SMI-S has a ton of functionality but it does not scale well. That is a key for plugging and playing into all of these new models,” said Richelle Ahlvers, chair of SNIA’s SSM Technical Work Group and principal storage management architect at Broadcom.
Ahlvers said the tech industry has been shifting to REST-based interfaces. SNIA partners wanted to see standards updated with a more modern interface that could play in all environments, including the emerging hyperscale and cloud scenarios. They also wanted storage management APIs that are simpler to implement and consume and accessible via a standard browser, she said.
“SMI-S and other standards, even on the server side, have been very complicated. It’s a high learning curve,” Ahlvers said
SNIA’s Scalable Storage Management (SSM) Technical Work Group formed last October to scope out the Swordfish project and drew up a charter in December. Broadcom, Dell, EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Inova, Intel, Microsoft, NetApp, Nimble Storage, and VMware are among vendors that played key roles in developing Swordfish.
The SNIA Swordfish specification is publicly available for implementation. Ahlvers said anyone with a Redfish implementation could tack on Swordfish within a few months, but those starting from scratch would need to do more work. She expects to see products and early implementations start to show up in the middle of next year.
“The key here is really going to be the client drivers,” said Ahlvers, noting the work of Intel, Microsoft and VMware. “Between those three, that’s going to be helping to pull the vendors to add support for Swordfish.”
SNIA Swordfish team members and industry experts are presenting details on the new specification at this week’s Storage Developer Conference in Santa Clara, California.
Nutanix took the last step before completing its initial public offering today when it set the target price range for its offering.
Nutanix filed an S-1 registration form with the Securities and Exchange Commission detailing plans to sell 14 million shares of Class A stock for between $11 and $13 per share. The hyper-converged market leader seeks to raise $209 million through the IPO. A Nutanix IPO price of $13 would make the company worth $1.8 billion. That falls below its $2 billion valuation at the time of its last funding round in 2015.
Nutanix first filed to go public last December, but the Nutanix IPO was stalled by a slow IPO market. There has only been a handful of tech IPOs in 2016.
One of Nutanix’s founders and its original CTO, Mohit Aron, said Nutanix executives and its investors likely were scared off by the poor IPO market. He said the current IPO market is less forgiving of a company still losing money despite strong revenue growth. Aron holds 10.7 million shares of shares of Nutanix common stock but no longer works for the vendor.
“Investors used to look at growth in past years,” Aron said. “This year, investor sentiment has turned and they’ve started looking for investors have started looking for profitability. Maybe Nutanix thought it would show a reduction in losses — which they’ve been showing — so investors would be more lenient towards looking at them.”
Aron said he expects Nutanix will do well in the long term. “Eventually, it’s about a technology that is ground-breaking, solves a real problem and customers are adopting it,” he said. “The technology makes sense. I see hyper-convergence getting adopted every day for primary and secondary storage. Markets go through temporary ups and downs. I think companies will do well when they have strong fundamentals.”
Aron calls Nutanix’s hyper-converged technology “my baby,” although he left in 2013 to start secondary data hyper-converged vendor Cohesity.
Nutanix investors will need patience if they want to see profit. In an SEC filing last week, Nutanix declared “we will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.”
The company has lost a total of $442 million during its history, including losses of $84 million, $126 million and $169 million in the last three fiscal years. Nutanix lost $50 million last quarter after losing $49 million the previous quarter.
Those losses came despite impressive revenue growth. Its revenue increased 84% year-over-year to $445 million during the last fiscal year, which ended July 31. For the quarter that ended July 31, it reported $140 million in revenue – a 22% increase over the same quarter last year – and has $255 million of revenue in the first two quarters of this calendar year. Most of Nutanix’s expenses come from sales and marketing — $288 million of its $439 million in expenses last fiscal year and $88 million of its $133 million in the last quarter came from sales and marketing.
The Nutanix IPO filing indicated no plans to decrease that spending. Nutanix claimed: “We intend to grow our base of 3,768 end-customers, which we believe represents a small portion of our potential end-customer base, by increasing our investment in sales and marketing, leveraging our network of channel partners and furthering our international expansion. One area of specific focus will be on expanding our position within the Global 2000, where we currently have approximately 310 end-customers.”
Aron said Nutanix needs to pursue a growth strategy if it is to hold off competitors such as Dell EMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Cisco. That includes research and development as well as sales and marketing. Nutanix is expanding its technology to become a platform of choice for companies looking to build internal enterprise clouds.
“I think we all know no company can just rest on its laurels and milk a technology for a while,” Aron said. “Others catch up eventually. You have to keep innovating.
“I think if they want to become profitable, they can do it next year. If a company wants to, it can put a complete break on growth, but what’s the point of profitability if you’re not growing? So there’s a healthy balance a company has to juggle.”
LAS VEGAS — In the pre-Symantec days when Veritas was an independent storage software company, its executives frequently bashed their primary competitor EMC. That rhetoric cooled after Symantec bought Veritas, and the chief EMC bashers (including current Dell EMC CMO Jeremy Burton) left Symantec.
With Veritas Technologies on its own again, its executives have resumed public attacks on EMC along with its new owner Dell. Veritas Vision in Las Vegas this week was filled with snarky pokes at both principals in the newly formed Dell EMC.
During a keynote given by Veritas CMO Lynn Lucas at the first Veritas Vision user conference in more than a decade, the company flashed a question for customers to ponder: “What is worse than a lifetime of hardware with EMC? An eternity in Dell.”
Veritas also took out an advertisement in the Wall Street Journal, stating “There is a special place in Dell for hardware.”
Mike Palmer, Veritas’ senior vice president and general manager of solutions for data insight and orchestration, said during his keynote address Tuesday that companies like EMC’s and Dell’s historical agenda was to sell more hardware in a world that is becoming more focused on software defined storage. Even when EMC acquired the successful VMware virtualization company, it “kept you in a walled garden of the VMware ecosystem.”
Palmer even compared EMC to convicted Los Angeles drug dealer Rick “Freeway” Ross.
“This is a guy that knew more about product lock-in than anyone. … He bought houses to store his cash,” Palmer said. “Rick Ross went to jail. Today, he sells T-shirts. EMC went to Hell, I mean to Dell.”
Palmer also took a swipe at Dell EMC’s Data Domain deduplication storage hardware, saying that for customers it’s like a 30-year-old kid living in the basement.
“He’s never moving out,” he said, while a bloated, man sitting on a sofa couch appeared on the screen.
In focusing on the Dell and EMC merger, Veritas tried to revive its own historical roots as a “no hardware agenda” that was its primary message before it was acquired by Symantec 10 years ago for $13.5 billion. On Aug. 2015 Symantec announced the sale of its Veritas information management business to The Carlyle Group. Veritas and Symantec achieved operational separation last Oct. 1, and the sale closed Jan. 30 when Veritas became a privately held company.
“Veritas is making the assumption that EMC separately or together with Dell cannot get away from their (hardware) past,” said Arun Taneja, founder of the Taneja Group storage consulting firm. “Veritas recognizes that they were considered a has-been company. They have been missing in action (under the Symantec ownership). So they needed to do something that was in-your-face and edgy. It’s their way of saying, ‘I’m back and you are going to pay attention to me.’
“The way to do that was to poke fun at the 800-pound gorilla. It was a gutsy choice.”
Taneja said Dell’s and EMC’s revenues still rely primarily on hardware. VMware, which gave EMC a beachhead in the virtualization software space, is also owned by Dell.
“Now with the merger, (Dell and EMC) have so many issues that this is the time for a pure software company, which is what Veritas has been from the beginning,” Taneja said. “Now, if they can pull it off, they will be back in the game. If they can’t, it will be a sad ending to the company.”
Backup vendor IDrive has added the private cloud to its repertoire, allowing customers to keep backup data on premises as well as in the public cloud.
The IDrive Private Cloud appliance features 6 TB of on-premises backup with the ability to access and manage from anywhere. The product also includes 6 TB of IDrive cloud backup space. The IDrive Private Cloud software is the same as the vendor’s public cloud software.
“The best part of the whole thing is it’s the exact same IDrive Client as the public cloud,” IDrive CEO Raghu Kulkarni said. “There’s no learning curve [for current IDrive public cloud users].”
Kulkarni said IDrive users and partners often requested a private cloud option. Businesses also wanted to store data locally and be able to access it through the cloud.
The IDrive software backs up data from multiple computers locally to the IDrive server. Data is encrypted in transit and in storage, with AES 256-bit encryption and an optional private key. The software protects servers and individual files.
Backing up the data locally makes for faster restores than from a public cloud. Users can access data from anywhere online, according to the vendor. The product scales to hundreds of terabytes and can handle an unlimited number of users. Its dashboard can manage the backup of hundreds of users, and monitor reporting and data usage.
The client for the IDrive cloud can restore 10 previous versions of backed up files from an account. It also combines backups from multiple devices — PCs, Macs and mobile — into a single account.
The IDrive Private Cloud brings enterprise-level functionality to small businesses and some medium-sized companies, Kulkarni said.
IDrive claims 3 million users of its public cloud. Small businesses make up 30-40% of that figure, Kulkarni said.
Since the software is the same, any improvement IDrive cloud makes to its public option will be available almost immediately for the private product as well.
Pricing for IDrive Private Cloud starts at an introductory rate of $1,000 for the first year for the 6 TB appliance with 6 TB of cloud backup space. Regular pricing is $2,000 per year. More space is available upon request.
Customers of Barracuda Networks just received some welcome news. In tandem with an upcoming software release, the backup specialist gave a 25% capacity boost to one of its midrange disk-based Barracuda storage appliances and lowered list prices on two high-end models.
Barracuda Backup software version 6.3 is slated for general availability later this year. The new agent adds multi-streaming replication and tools to export data to virtual tape storage in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud.
The software enhancements will be available to customers that purchase Barracuda storage directly from the vendor, as well as backup storage products via its Intronis managed services provider (MSP).
On the hardware side, new Barracuda Backup 990 appliances have 48 TB of usable storage, up from 36 TB. Model pricing remains the same at $49,999. Customers with an active Instant Replacement subscription will receive the upgraded Barracuda 990 at no charge. Instant Replacement entitles eligible Barracuda customers to upgrade their hardware every four years.
Prices are reduced on Barracuda Backup 995 and Barracuda Backup 1090 devices. Barracuda’s 995 model starts at $67,000 for 72 TB of usable storage, down from $90,000. The Backup 1090 device with 112 TB of usable Barracuda storage starts at $105,000, reduced from $135,000.
Barracuda Backup software version 6.3 is in early availability. The existing software includes a feature called LiveBoot, which allows users to run image-based backups of virtual servers for instant recovery. The addition of multi-streaming is designed to improve backup and restore times by allowing a backup server to process several files simultaneously. Barracuda also added a replication-queuing system to address storage bottlenecks in high-transaction environments.
Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is a software-as-a-service offering launched in 2015 for Microsoft Office 365. Barracuda said v6.3 reduces the time needed to complete incremental backups running a hosted online version of Microsoft Windows applications.
Barracuda’s storage cloud allows subscribers to place data in an offsite vault for up to seven years. To support longer retention times, the enhanced Barracuda software adds the AWS Storage Gateway-VTL for long-term retention in Amazon Simple Storage Service or Amazon Glacier.
Barracuda is best known for its network security products, but enterprise storage accounts for a growing part of its business, with offerings tailored for backup and data protection. The Barracuda storage portfolio expanded last September with its $65 million acquisition of Intronis Inc., which designs backup platforms used specifically by MSPs.
With time and money running out, Violin Memory next week will take another shot at launching a successful all-flash array. It might be its last shot – Violin doesn’t have enough money to last another year at its current losses.
Violin on Wednesday will launch its next family of Flash Storage Platform (FSP) arrays as it tries to stay relevant in the all-flash market it helped create. Full details of the product won’t be available until launch day, but CEO Kevin DeNuccio teased it Thursday night during Violin’s earnings call. The new FSP is a key piece of Violin’s survival strategy, along with reduced spending and a raising of capital.
DeNuccio said the new FSPs will double the IOPS (input/output operations per second) performance of its current FSP systems and cut latency by five times. Violin will allow customers to run its Concerto operating system in a public cloud, enabling customers to use the cloud for backup, disaster recovery and data that does not require flash performance.
Violin will also add encryption software across all of its arrays in the latest Concerto update.
DeNuccio said the cloud enhancements “will position the Violin’s Flash Storage Platform as the best product line for building private, hybrid, and public clouds. While enterprises have been migrating data to the cloud over the last several years, the coordination, management and retrieval challenges of data have been very difficult. The Concerto in the cloud solution will address this customer pain point.”
The new system follows Violin’s 2015 launch of its FSP 7300 and 7700 arrays, which added the data management and protection features missing from its earlier flash systems. Those FSP arrays never caught on with customers. Violin reported revenue of $7.5 million last quarter, down from $9.7 million the previous quarter and $15.3 million in the same quarter last year.
Product revenue of $2 million last quarter came at the cost of $7.5 million that Violin spent on sales and marketing.
FSP sales have been a big disappointment, failing to come close to Violin’s projected revenue growth of 25% to 35%.
To put Violin’s revenue in perspective, all-flash competitor Pure Storage raked in $163 million in revenue last quarter. Nimble Storage sold 133 all-flash arrays in their first full quarter on the market. Among legacy vendors, Dell EMC’s XtremIO all-flash array will hit close to $2 billion in revenue this year and NetApp sold $194 million in all-flash arrays last quarter.
So while the all-flash market is booming, Violin Memory is going bust.
“This quarter’s performance is obviously frustrating and disappointing,” DeNuccio said. “We still have many challenges to return to growth and complete our turnaround.”
Violin lost $20.6 million last quarter, burned through $13 million and has $36 million in cash remaining. Violin executives said they are cutting expenses and looking for outside financing to stay afloat.
“We believe our existing cash balance is insufficient to operate the business for the next 12 months even as we continue to restructure our operations and reduce spending even further,” CFO Cory Sindelar said.
To cut expenses, Violin is outsourcing much of its development work to GlobalLogic. Sindelar estimated the outsourcing will save Violin $5 million a year. Violin is also putting COO Ebrahim Abbasi in charge of sales and marketing to take “a layer out of management out of our senior rank,” according to DeNuccio. DeNuccio said his goal is to reduce quarterly expenses to under $11.5 million by the start of 2017, which means it would require $70 million to $80 million in annual revenue to break even.
Violin executives have not said how the changes will affect headcount. Violin Memory has already gone from 318 employees at the start of the year to 235 at the end of last quarter, and now stands about 200.
“We learned a lot over the last couple of years,” DeNuccio said. “We are learning from our mistakes and making the necessary adjustments.”