U.K.-based Aorta Cloud is trying to rescue its soon-to-be-defunct cloud storage provider partner Nirvanix, and has apparently enlisted the help of IBM. The provider is also asking if Nirvanix customers want to pitch in.
Aorta – with the help of its sister company Aorta Capital – has set up a Nirvanix Rescue Package page on its website detailing efforts to save the day for Nirvanix customers. Nirvanix notified its customers earlier this week that they have until the end of September to move their data off its cloud because it is going out of business.
The note on the Aorta web site from CEO Steve Ampleford claims his group has a “seven-figure commitment” to provide liquidity and a bank has agreed to match its investment. He also asked if there were any Nirvanix customers who would like to join his funding effort. The plan is to raise enough money to keep the company going for at least two months, and then try to secure more funding to save it long-term or at least give customers more time to get their data off the Nirvanix cloud. Ampleford said he wanted to consolidate Nirvanix’s seven global data centers into two or three to maintain operations while reducing overhead.
“After all, the hurdles for existing customers to move their data are substantial and if there is any way that we can help Nirvanix continue its operations, this has to be a preferable scenario for those customers to any alternative,” Ampleford wrote in his blog. “ … The technology is robust and solid, the business is credible, the market clearly exists and demand is there. We must be able to find a way forward together.
An update to the site posted today claims “We can now publicly confirm that IBM are an active participant in our attempt to drive forward a solution. More to follow …”
IBM is a Nirvanix OEM partner.
Hewlett-Packard today upgraded its Application Information Optimizer (AIO) archiving application, adding support for the cloud and integration with the HP Intelligent Data Operation Layer (IDOL) search engine.
AIO, which HP acquired when it bought Autonomy in 2011, is used to archive or retire data for performance or regulation purposes. It includes e-discovery and data protection features for information governance. The software accesses, classifies and moves outdated and inactive structured data from production databases and legacy applications onto lower-cost storage. From there, it can be used in other applications or deleted.
The integration with the IDOL search engine lets customers mine structured and unstructured data through AIO. With the new release, HP added support for the HP Cloud and Amazon S3.
“We are adding flexibility on where you can retrieve the information and where customers can put the data, such as the cloud,” said Joe Garber, HP’s vice president of information governance.
IDOL integration gives AIO “Google-like” search so administrators can easily locate data residing on old hardware that is difficult to retrieve because of outdated technology.
AIO now can do searches across multiple IBM DB2 databases via the IDOL search engine. Administrators can use SQL or plain English searches.
Hewlett-Packard (HP) has officially killed its Enterprise Virtual Array (EVA) SAN platform, telling customers it will stop selling the two remaining models next January. HP is steering customers instead to its Converged Storage portfolio, which basically means its 3PAR StoreServ platform.
An HP spokesman said the vendor last week notified its EVA customers that it will stop selling the HP EVA P6530 and P6550 – the last models still on the market. HP will continue to support disk drives, major operating systems and SAN infrastructure through Jan. 31, 2017.
This is no surprise. HP last December began offering 3PAR Online import software to move customers from EVA to StoreServ arrays through EVA’s Command View management interface. HP also started using EVA’s Smart Start application to deploy 3PAR arrays.
“For HP EVA customers considering either a technology refresh or new application deployments, the replacement product for EVA systems is HP 3PAR StoreServ 7000 Storage,” the HP spokesman wrote in an e-mail about the EVA end-of-life notice. “In fact, moving from EVA to 3PAR is easier than moving from EVA to EVA.”
When HP came out with the migration software to move from EVA to HP, the vendor said it would not end-of-life EVA through 2013. It lived up to that pledge, and tacked on a month extra although it seems unlikely that any one will buy an EVA now that its fate has been sealed.
HP has made the 3PAR platform its flagship storage platform since acquiring 3PAR for $2.35 billion in 2010. 3PAR sales have been strong since then, while EVA has faltered and dragged down HP overall storage sales. During the last quarter, HP reported 3PAR sales increased more than 10% year-over-year while overall storage sales dropped 10% to $833 million.
When HP launched the StoreServ Storage 7000 and migration software last year, HP storage marketing VP Craig Nunes claimed “this StoreServ platform is everything you would want in a next-generation EVA.”
Compaq originally developed the EVA in 2001, and it became HP’s major midrange storage platform after the 2002 merger between those companies. HP claims there are were well over 100,000 EVA systems deployed.
Dealing with information in IT operations includes delivering the resources to store and retrieve information as well as all the management and security requirements. Continued capacity demand creates challenges in adding more storage systems, adapting the data protection process for additional capacity, and ensuring that performance scales in parallel with capacity to meet application and system demands.
This continuum of managing storage gets disrupted when a big storage problem is introduced into IT. Big in this case means a large amount of unplanned capacity is introduced into IT. The large amount of data can come from new projects or acquisitions or from non-traditional data (not usually stored in IT) used for analytics. The capacity demand seen for these types of requirements may dwarf the existing storage systems and processes in IT currently.
Extending current environments usually doesn’t work for these large capacity situations. Public clouds or private clouds can add capacity more quickly, but adding capacity alone doesn’t solve the problem. The ability to move data and manage it is also required.
The type of information growing fastest is unstructured data in the form of files. The massive number of files presents another problem. Storing the potentially billions of files into file systems may not be possible or may result in slow access using the hierarchical index structures. Using next-generation object storage with a flat address space may be the answer. Most cloud storage offerings use object storage with RESTful access protocols such as Amazon S3. Object storage systems deployed within IT either independently or as part of private clouds uses protocols for objects or use gateway devices or file system interfaces to map file access to objects. So we see object storage used to solve the big storage or massive amount of data problem.
Object storage systems or software vary greatly in capability and support for access protocols. But solving the big storage problem really isn’t about object storage. It’s about the problem and the approaches. Object storage is a technology to use as part of the solution.
(Randy Kerns is Senior Strategist at Evaluator Group, an IT analyst firm).
The speculation about troubled cloud storage vendor Nirvanix was true: today the company took steps to begin closing its doors.
Nirvanix did not comment on its future, but advised customers to stop replicating data to the Nirvaix cloud and to move their data off the company’s systems in the next couple of weeks.
Nirvanix sent a notification to customers late this afternoon with suggestions to follow for data migration, because it plans to disable uploads to the cloud on Sept. 23. The e-mail to customers read: “We are notifying you as soon as possible after making this decision so that you can make alternative plans for storage service. Nirvanix will have resources available to continue to provide service between now and Oct. 15 for you to download your data free of charge.”
“It’s been crazy,” said Chris Pyle, chief executive of Champion Solutions Group, a Nirvanix partner who received a call from Nirvanix at 9 a.m. today. “It’s a complete surprise. Yes, it’s disheartening.”
Oracle launched two new ZFS-based storage appliances this week, gave them a new name and released benchmarks that the vendor claims show it is the fastest file storage system on the market.
The new Oracle ZFS Storage Appliances have two models — the ZS3-2 and ZS3-4. The systems are the next generation of what Oracle previously called the Sun Storage ZFS 7000 Series. Like the 7000 series, the ZS3-2 and ZS3-4 are optimized for Oracle software applications with the goal of running database queries and analytics faster.
Both new systems are available in single or dual-cluster configurations with up to 12.8 TB of read flash cache. The ZS3-2 has four eight-core Intel Xeon processors, 512 GB of DRAM cache, and scales to 768 TB with eight disk shelves. The ZS3-4 has eight 10-core Xeon processors, 2 TB of read flash cache and scales to 3.5 PB with 36 shelves.
Jason Schaffer, Oracle’s senior director of storage product management, claims the big enhancements are in the software designed to simplify deployment and improve performance of Oracle databases. These enhancements include Oracle Intelligent Storage Protocol (OISP) that automates Oracle Database tuning and administration. OISP allows Oracle Database 12c to communicate metadata to the storage system to optimize performance. The ZS3 appliances also have new heat map and Automatic Data Optimization (ADO) capabilities to apply different compression levels depending on where the data is in its lifecycle. It also uses Hybrid Columnar Compression (HCC) to significantly compress Oracle Database data.
Oracle claims the ZS3-4 set benchmark “new world records” with its 450,702 SPECsfs operations per second throughput score for a dual-node NAS system, and its SPC-2 $22.53 price performance and aggregate throughput of 17,244 MB per second.
“Oracle applications will see a tremendous advantage of moving to ZS3 over competitive systems,” Schaffer said. “It’s designed to insure that any Oracle software running behind ZS3 will be the fastest and most efficient.”
In a report on the ZS3 series, SSG-Now founding analyst Deni Connor wrote that the automated database-to-storage tuning, heat map-drive tiering and HCC “separate ZFS storage from the rest of the competition in Oracle environments … Running an Oracle Database without these features enabled is like flying a plane without all the engines turned on – you’re still flying but you’re not getting the maximum output and velocity that’s available to you.”
You say you’re not running Oracle database apps? Never mind, then.
Quantum this week took the wraps off its latest StorNext data management file system, adding performance, scalability and flexibility.
StorNext 5 represents a substantial re-write of the software that will be available standalone or on integrated appliances. Quantum claims the new metadata controller appliance performs up to 10 times faster and scales five times as high as the previous version. It also added NAS and HTTP/REST cloud-based network support to go along with the previous SAN support. The software was also optimized to run with solid-state drives (SSDs), InfiniBand networking and multi-core processors.
“This is a rebuilding from the ground up,” said Janet LaFleur, Quantum’s senior product marketing manager for StorNext.
Performance improvements focus on better cache management and CPU utilization, which help support more users and files. Quantum said small file performance has been drastically improved, making StorNext 5 a better fit for applications that require fast file creation and deletions such as financial analytics and high performance computing (HPC).
The new version supports up to five billion files shared in one StorNext File System (up from 1 billion in the previous version) and metadata into the petabytes.
StorNext 5 will be available on appliances in December, and as software-only in 2014. StoreNext M440 and M660 appliance customers will get the StorNext 5 upgrade with their support contracts. However, the new StorNext 5 appliances will be given a new name, which Quantum has yet to reveal.
LaFleur said the hardware in the appliances will be updated for speed, but “this is primarily a software change. You wouldn’t see this level of improvement if it were only new hardware.”
StorNext, along with the DXi disk backup platform, is a key piece of Quantum’s strategy to expand from its legacy standing as a tape vendor. While DXi sales have been uneven, Quantum reported 55 new customers and 13 percent year-over-year growth of StorNext revenue last quarter, including a 60 percent increase in appliances.
Dell Inc. is reverting into a private company, while it tries to relaunch its strategy of becoming a stronger enterprise player.
On Thursday, CEO Michael Dell and CFO Brian Gladden said shareholders finally approved multi-billion dollar deal that gives Michael Dell control of the company he founded back in 1984. Shareholders have agreed to a sell the company to the CEO and private equity firm Silver Lake Partners for $25 billion, giving Michael Dell 75 percent ownership of the firm.
During a Thursday conference call, Michael Dell said they plan to “go back to our roots.” However, the strategy that Dell and Gladden offered seemed to be more of the same, with plans to invest in customers’ end-to-end IT needs, increase software revenues and expand the partnership program. The company has made a slew of acquisitions in the last several years, particularly in storage , as it tried to become more of an enterprise-level company. Executives did not offer much about technology details, other than saying they have the products needed to to be recognized as more than a PC company.
“We have done a broad reset of our strategy over the last four years,” said Gladden. “We are recognized as having a full portfolio of enterprise solutions. Now its time for execution.”
Western Digital continued its flash storage shopping spree today, saying it intends to acquire server-side flash startup Virident Systems for $685 million.
The deal is expected to close by the end of 2013, and Virident will become part of Western Digital’s HGST subsidiary. Virident is the third flash acquisition for Western Digital/HGST this year.
Western Digital/HGST’s $340 million acquisition of solid-state drive (SSD) manufacturer sTEC is also expected to close by the end of the year and it already closed on caching software startup VeloBit.
Virident launched its first FlashMAX PCIe card in 2011, and added FlashMAX II with double the capacity a year ago. The startup also sells FlashMax Connect software that provides high availability, pooling of storage across servers and caching for its PCI Express (PCIe) cards.
Virident, which had $116 million in funding, has OEM partnerships with Seagate and EMC. Seagate sells Virident PCIe cards as its X8 Accelerator. The future of that deal is uncertain because Western Digital is a Seagate competitor. EMC sells Virident FlashMAX II cards as part of its XtremSF PCIe flash portfolio.
Virident CEO Mike Gustafson will become HGST senior vice president and lead the Virdent team inside Western Digital.
Worldwide external disk storage system revenue came in at $5.9 billion for the second straight quarter for the period ending in June, according to IDC. The revenue also declined year-over-year for the second straight quarter, following four years of solid year-over-year growth.
The latest results show revenue down 0.8 percent for networked (SAN and NAS) systems. While declining revenue is bad news for storage vendors, it is good news for buyers. The sales dip came mainly from declining price, not declining demand. IDC research director Eric Sheppard said units sold were up 15% from last year and terabytes shipped increased 26% from last year. That’s below the close to 40% TB growth we used to see a few years ago, but shows that storage capacity needs are still expanding.
The dip in revenue also shows an increased resourcefulness on the part of storage admins, who are truly doing more with less.
“Part of this is efficiency,” Sheppard said. “Users have gotten comfortable with storage efficiency techniques like dedupe, compression and tiering than two years ago. Flash is also a big part of storage efficiency because it increases tiering.”
Sheppard said the public cloud is also playing a part in organizations buying less storage. Larger providers such as Amazon and Google build their own storage and often buy commodity hardware instead of going to large storage vendors. But Sheppard pointed out that many smaller service providers build clouds with gear from the large vendors, and that is becoming a big piece of storage vendors’ revenues.
EMC continues to lead the vendor race. Its market share increased to 31.3% from 30.4% in the previous year and revenue grew 2.1% to $1.86 billion in the second quarter. NetApp made the biggest jump, increasing revenue 8.6% year-over-year to $789 million and moved into second with 13.3% market share.
Sheppard said NetApp’s jump was in large part to customers upgrading to Data Ontap 8.2 and Clustered Data OnTap operating systems and successful partnerships, particularly the FlexPod reference architecture designed with Cisco and other vendors.
Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) took the biggest tumble, with revenue down 12.4% to $424 million and 7.1% share. Most of Hitachi’s problems came in Japan and its revenues fell only 2.7% in the rest of the world, Sheppard said.
IBM placed third with $747 million and 12.6% market share, Hewlett-Packard (HP) was fourth at $594 million and 10% share and Dell moved ahead of HDS into fifth with $454 million and 7.6% share. However, IBM external storage revenue dipped three percent from last year, with Dell dropping 3.1 percent and HP 7.5 percent.
The “others” category – consisting mostly of startups – had an aggregate $1.08 billion for 18.2 percent of the market and declined 0.4 percent from 2012.
The NAS market increased 2.5% over last year with EMC (46.3% market share) and NetApp (30.8% share) leading the way. The SAN market declined by 0.6 percent.