Enterprise file sharing vendor Syncplicity recently announced its software is now integrated with Microsoft Office 365, while competitor Egnyte rolled out its Egnyte Protect governance solution.
Syncplicty’s latest update includes at Microsoft Office Online capability so that users with an Office 365 account can view and edit documents directly from an online web browser. The company also added support for editing Office applications on their Android devices, along with a Syncplicity App Tab for in-use file notifications so that users are notified in real-time when files are being viewed, editing and saved.
A multi-folder sharing with security controls also has been added so IT administrators can control the sharing rights for files and folders. The Syncplicity application also now supports Microsoft Azure so that users can locate Syncplicity StorageVaults on the Azure public cloud.
“We now support that object-based storage model,” said Kevin de Smidt, Syncplicity’s vice president of products and marketing.”
Enterprise file sharing competitor Egnyte launched a hybrid data governance solution that allows users to control files stored collectively in Box, Dropbox, Microsoft SharePoint, Google Drive, Documentum and network attached servers (NAS). The Egnyte Protect data governance capability integrates with the public cloud and on-premise repositories.
Isabelle Guis, Egnyte’s chief marketing and strategy officer, said the Egnyte Protect is a uniform abstraction layer that connects to on-premise repositories. The governance capability gives IT administrators universal control over content.
“We make sure that policies and security features are enforced,” she said.
Egnyte customer Vimal Thomas, CIO at Yamaha, is a beta customer for Egnyte Protect. The company got rid of all their file servers and moved and moved all their Windows-based file server data into the enterprise file sharing Egnyte cloud last year. They had five file servers using direct-attached storage (DAS) that serviced 600 users.
“We had Windows file servers and we could not share files outside of Yamaha (and) there was no versioning,” Thomas said.
Thomas said they have their SharePoint on Egnyte Protect, giving them the ability to see who has access to sales data or the daily report on financials but also the control to make sure data is accessed by only a select group of people. All the data is encrypted and the data filtered to protect files that, for example, have social security numbers. Yamaha previously was a Dropbox customer for two years but they dropped the product last year.
“It was not enterprise-grade. It’s consumer-grade software,” Thomas said.
Diablo Technologies chalked up another legal victory over Netlist this week, although Netlist’s separate patent infringement lawsuit remains unresolved.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit this week upheld a March 2015 jury verdict that Diablo Technologies did not breach a supply contract with Netlist, its former development partner. Netlist did not appeal the jury’s findings that Diablo did not violate a non-disclosure agreement and did not misuse trade secrets.
Netlist asked the Federal Circuit to review the contract language and rule that Diablo’s use of Netlist chips in the design of SanDisk ULLtraDIMM technology constituted a breach of contract. The three-judge Federal Circuit panel heard oral arguments on July 7 and affirmed the jury verdict two business days later.
The Irvine, California-based memory module manufacturer has two options to appeal the Federal Circuit panel’s decision. Netlist can request an “en banc” rehearing of the case before all of the Federal Circuit judges or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Through a spokesman, Netlist declined to comment on whether it intends to appeal the decision.
The appellate ruling will become final within two weeks if Netlist does not appeal the three-judge panel’s decision, according to Fabio Marino, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, the law firm representing Diablo Technologies.
Marino, lead counsel for Diablo, said the appellate decision would conclude Netlist’s main case against Diablo. “The patent case is really against SanDisk, and we are implicated as a supplier,” he said.
Prior to the March 2015 trial, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California had granted Netlist’s request for a preliminary injunction to stop Ottawa-based Diablo Technologies from supplying SanDisk with the chipset for the ULLtraDIMM product. The court dissolved the preliminary injunction a month after the jury verdict. SanDisk is now part of Western Digital.
Patent lawsuit stayed
The U.S. District Court suspended Netlist’s seven-patent lawsuit pending the completion of Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to Netlist, Diablo, SanDisk and Smart Modular Technologies filed a total of 17 IPRs to try to invalidate Netlist’s asserted patents related to memory technology.
Noel Whitley, vice president of intellectual property and licensing at Netlist, claimed that Netlist has prevailed in the reviews of five patents with the Patent Trial and Appeals Board. He said Netlist is appealing the results with two other patents, and the patent lawsuit will likely remain stayed until all IPR-related appeals are complete.
IDrive has opened its vault to offer a new hybrid backup appliance, touting the product as feature-rich but affordable data protection.
The IDrive Vault, available now, provides 4 TB of local storage and 4 TB of cloud backup space. It’s compatible with the IDrive cloud.
“It’s a nice little package and a good disaster recovery solution,” said Matthew Harvey, senior business development manager at IDrive.
Target customers include SMBs and small to mid-sized enterprises, Harvey said.
The IDrive Vault appliance costs $1,000 per year, including the 4 TB of cloud backup space. Each additional year of cloud backup costs $1,000. For a limited time, IDrive is offering the Vault appliance at $500 for the first year.
Harvey said one of the keys to the appliance is its affordability. He also noted it can back up an unlimited number of servers and endpoint devices.
IDrive Vault’s other major elements include:
• Local snapshotting: Users can roll back to any previous snapshots of files or folders
• Time Machine backup: Users can back up a drive locally and push it to the cloud
• Security: Data transferred from the appliance to the cloud is protected with 256-bit AES encryption, with an optional private key known only to the user
“The market has always wanted more features,” Harvey said.
IDrive has been working on the appliance since early this year, following market demand and suggestions from its customers. The IDrive Vault hybrid backup will be especially helpful in the fight against ransomware, Harvey said.
Vault customers can also use the IDrive Express service, which involves requesting a hard drive from the company and sending it back with data to be backed up in the IDrive cloud within five to seven days.
Users can return IDrive Vault and cancel the account within 30 days to receive a full refund. Since the device is on subscription lease, a user who cancels must return it.
A new reporting tool added this week into IDrive business accounts provides a clear visibility to administrators of the status of all sub-accounts, so they can see username, device name, user status, last activity and last backup status. Harvey said that the reporting tool is for IDrive’s software and is not specific to the Vault, but it can be accessed with the IDrive cloud.
Rubrik’s early focus is on data protection, although it has designs on primary data eventually. It is pushing its r300 and r500 Series appliances with Pure Storage’s FlashArray//m platform. The vendors claim common customers are seeing more than 250 TB per hour ingest rate from Pure arrays per Rubrik appliance.
Rubrik CEO Bipul Sinha said the partnership with Pure includes collaboration among their sales team plus co-engineering that allows Rubrik appliances to directly read data from Pure SANs. That’s a unique feature for Rubrik, which connects to other storage systems through VMware APIs. Common customers can manage Rubrik and Pure systems through the same browser.
Both systems dedupe data – Pure handling primary data and Rubrik backup data.
“The systems complement each other,” Sinha said. “The biggest benefit is the faster ingest. We make sure we extract data from the primary array without hurting performance of the primary data. We have seen dramatic throughput from data coming from Pure to Rubrik.”
Sinha said Rubrik will have a similar partnership with Pure’s FlashBlade when the unstructured data system ships.
Pure and Rubrik name ExponentHR, Castilleja School, Red Hawk Casino, Phreesia, and Wabash as customers using Pure flash arrays and Rubrik appliances for data protection.
With Cisco Live running this week, there were other storage partnerships in the news. Backup software vendor Commvault launched reference architectures combining its data protection with Cisco UCS servers and added support for Cisco HyperFlex hyper-converged appliances. Commvault software will detect and classify new virtual machines on HyperFlex, and also load balances across backup servers.
Flash array vendor Tegile Systems expanded its IntelliStack converged infrastructure with Cisco UCS. Tegile customers can use IntelliStack software to orchestrate and automate management through Cisco UCS Director. UCS Director manages compute, network, virtualization, storage and public clouds connected to UCS.
Cloud provider Backblaze has gone GA with B2 Cloud Storage, a cloud service that is trying to compete with heavy hitters such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft Azure at a cheaper cost.
The Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, which went into private beta in September 2015 and then public beta December that year, is an open-source object storage service in the cloud. It provides cloud storage for backup, disaster recovery, replication and copying data on tape and it can work with on-premise or public-based cloud.
“If you want compute or database and you use Amazon S3 storage, then you want to stay with Amazon,” Backblaze CEO Gleb Budman said. “But if you don’t need all the other things that Amazon offers and you care about cost then we will provide the storage. B2 is four to six times lower in cost than Amazon S3.”
Backblaze came out of stealth seven years ago with the Backblaze Storage Pod that was a high-density, cheap online cloud service that offered unlimited storage at $5 a month. It was marketed as online backup for consumers and businesses with no more than a few employees.
The company built its own systems, called storage pods that contain 67 TB of capacity in 4U servers for its cloud. Backblaze now is making its cloud service available either through a Web interface, a command line interface or API interface integrated with applications.
Backblaze partners Synology, CloudBerry Lab and Ortana Media Group use B2 as a cloud target. Synology’s Network Attached storage (NAS) users can sync folders between the Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage and the Synology NAS system. After installing the 2.1.0 Cloud Sync package to their system, customers can select Backblaze B2 as their cloud destination.
CloudBerry Lab, which provides a cloud-based backup and file management service to small to med-size business, has integrated Backblaze B2 with the CloudBerry Backup for Windows Servers. Support for B2 on CloudBerry Explorer and CloudBerry Managed Backup Service is on the road map.
Ortana Media Group’s Cubix is a scalable software platform for controlling media workflow, such as post production, broadcast and archiving. Backblaze B2 is integrated in Cubix as a storage destination for a customer’s digital assets. Cubix defines storage rules and can automatically route the assets to the appropriate storage media and location.
In the latest shot fired in the David-and-Goliath dispute between Nexsan Technologies and EMC over the Unity trademark, EMC claimed it began using the Unity brand name in 2014. The first scheduled court appearance for the lawsuit is less than two weeks away.
Nexsan filed a complaint on May 6 in the United States District Court in Boston, claiming it has priority to the Unity trademark. EMC submitted counterclaims on June 20 alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. The vendors are scheduled to make their first court appearance on July 14 before U.S. District Court judge William Young.
The battle started in the spring, after Nexsan and EMC executed major product launches for their respective Unity products. Nexsan’s press release hit the wires on April 26 for its Unity storage product, combining NAS, SAN and enterprise private-cloud file system synchronization. Nexsan had submitted applications for the terms “Unity” and “Nexsan Unity” on March 22, 2016 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
EMC filed its applications for the “Unity” and “EMC Unity” trademarks with the USPTO on April 29 – the same day it sent a letter to Nexsan reserving the “right to commence legal action” if Nexsan didn’t stop using the product name Unity and withdraw its trademark applications. EMC launched its Unity mid-range array, combining block and file storage, on May 2 at EMC World 2016.
In its June 20 court filing, EMC claimed it started using the Unity and EMC Unity trademarks publicly more than two years ago in connection with an extension of its VNX storage system. Examples cited in the court document include:
–May 5, 2014: Blog post by Chad Sakac at http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2014/05/vnx-architectural-evolution-keeps-rolling-vnxe-3200-project-liberty.html
–March 19, 2015: Unity product presentation to a customer and large reseller. At least three additional customer presentations took place in March 2015, according to EMC.
–Dec. 14, 2015 to March 14, 2016: EMC provided 21 partners and customers versions of the Unity product, “featuring the UNITY marks.” Several of those original beta testers subsequently purchased the products, according to EMC.
EMC also claimed that “at least as early as” May 2014 it “has spent a significant amount of money to advertise” the Unity products. As a result, “purchasers and potential purchasers of data management software immediately associate the distinctive” Unity trademarks with EMC, according to the company’s court filing.
So, if EMC had been using the name Unity for so long, why did the company wait until April 29 to file its trademark application with the USPTO?
EMC declined comment for this blog post, citing a policy not to comment on pending litigation.
Nexsan also declined comment yesterday on EMC’s counterclaims. But, in a May conversation, Nexsan CEO Bob Fernander said he had no knowledge of any 2015 EMC customer presentations in which the term “Unity” may have been used.
“You’ve got to do it publicly,” Fernander said at the time. “And the definition of public is kind of common sense, we think. And your commerce becomes another next step in the process of making it publicly known that you’re using a mark. So we’re scratching our heads on that one.”
Fernander said he first learned of the EMC Unity product when he received a call from a reseller in May, asking him if he knew that EMC had just launched a product bearing the same name as Nexsan’s product.
Lisa Tittemore, an attorney at Boston-based Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, the firm that filed Nexsan’s federal court complaint, said in May, “Priority is based on who uses or files the mark first, so you can have rights based on filing first or based on using first. That’s literally what this lawsuit is about.”
Through its court filing, EMC claimed it exercised valid trademark rights and had priority over Nexsan since its “adoption, promotion, beta testing and offering for sale” of its Unity products pre-dated Nexsan’s trademark application filing dates or “any other dates upon which Nexsan could rely.”
EMC claimed, via the document, that Nexsan’s Unity products were not generally available until June 2016 at the earliest and that Nexsan had not indicated it had closed any sales for the Unity system.
Red Hat Storage showed off updates to its Ceph and Gluster software and laid out its strategy for working with containers at this week’s Red Hat Summit in San Francisco.
We caught up with Ranga Rangachari, vice president and general manager of Red Hat Storage, to discuss the latest product releases, industry trends and the company’s future storage direction. Interview excerpts follow.
Which of the Red Hat storage products – Gluster or Ceph – is seeing greater adoption?
Rangachari: Both of them are. It’s very much a workload-driven conversation. Ceph is part and parcel to the OpenStack story. In the community, [the majority] of the OpenStack implementations were using Ceph as the storage substrate. Gluster is classic file serving – second-tier storage, deep archiving. If I were to take a look at the big picture, it’s right down the middle. Some days, you might have a lot more OpenStack conversations. Other days, you might have a lot more archiving, file services or virtualization conversations.
Red Hat just unveiled a technology preview of the Ceph file system (CephFS). Why does Red Hat need another file-based storage option?
Rangachari: The tech preview is focused on OpenStack. The advantage of this approach is customers can now use Ceph for file, object and block for OpenStack. Ceph has good penetration within the OpenStack market for block storage. We expanded it to object, and file is the third leg to the stool.
Do you envision CephFS in use only in conjunction with OpenStack?
Rangachari: It’s tough to predict, but for the foreseeable future, it’s going to be mainly focused on OpenStack. File systems need a lot of time from a testing and a maturity standpoint before we throw it out and say, ‘Start using it for general-purpose workloads.’ . . . We have not yet formulated any detailed plans around what else we could do with CephFS beyond OpenStack.
What’s the future direction for Ceph and Gluster?
Rangachari: One area that we are focused on the ability to manage our portfolio through a single management plane. The other area is interfacing and integrating with leading ISV applications, especially in the object storage space. The first wave of our ecosystem was around the hardware vendors, whether it’s server vendors or SSDs and those type of things.
With all the disruption in the storage industry, which events are having the greatest impact on Red Hat storage strategy?
Rangachari: One is flash [solid-state drives] SSDs. One of the biggest holdbacks a year ago was that the cost per TB was pretty expensive when it comes to SSDs and flash. But now I think Moore’s law in a way is taking shape. You’re seeing the processing and the capacity increase and the price dramatically drop. That’s one area that we are paying very close attention to, and the SanDisk [InfiniFlash] announcement was the first step in that direction.
The other thing that we are seeing is containers. In the conversations that we are having with customers, that’s becoming the next wave in infrastructure and the next wave in how applications are developed and delivered.
IBM is bringing in industry veteran Ed Walsh to try to light a fire under its struggling storage division.
Walsh will take over as general manager of IBM Storage and Software Defined Infrastructure on July 11. He joins IBM from Catalogic Software, where he was CEO since 2014.
Walsh worked for IBM Storage from 2010-13 and has been CEO of four storage startups. Walsh became CEO of Catalogic nine months after it spun out of Syncsort. Under Walsh, Catalogic has broadened the storage arrays it supports – adding support for IBM and EMC systems to go with its original NetApp support.
An e- mail from an IBM spokesperson referred to Wash as a “change agent” and noted his “ability to drive transformation and lead teams to embrace a new direction.” Walsh is expected to try and rally IBM’s storage business around its FlashSystem all-flash platform, Spectrum storage software and its Cleversafe object storage acquisition.
Walsh faces a different type of challenge at IBM than he is used to. He is considered a turnaround specialist of startups, and his tenure usually ends with a sale to a larger vendor. At IBM he will be tasked with waking a sleeping giant and he will more likely be buying companies instead of selling his.
IBM’s storage revenue has declined in each of the last four years, dropping from $3.7 billion in 2011 to $2.4 billion in 2015. Its storage hardware revenue was $433.5 million in the first quarter of this year, down 6% year over year.
According to IDC, IBM stood fifth behind EMC, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Hitachi in networked storage sales in the first quarter with 7.9% market share. IBM’s full year 2015 market share was 10%, according to IDC.
IBM has fared better in the all-flash market, ranking second by IDC for 2015. However, IDC put IBM’s first quarter all-flash revenue at $67.4 million, up 54% in a market that grew 87.4%. IBM ranked fifth in all-flash revenue for the first quarter behind EMC, NetApp, Pure Storage and HPE on IDC’s list.
Walsh was IBM’s vice president in storage in charge of marketing and strategy after selling primary data compression vendor Storwize to Big Blue in 2010. Walsh was also CEO of data deduplication pioneer Avamar from 2005 until selling the company to EMC in November of 2006. He stayed with EMC to run the Avamar division until February 2007. He was CEO of server virtualization startup Virtual Iron from 2009 until selling that company to Oracle in 2010.
Walsh was also VP of sales, marketing and alliance for Fibre Channel switch vendor CNT Technologies from 2001 to 2005.
Walsh replaces Greg Lotko, who held the GM job on an interim basis and will becomes vice president of development for IBM Storage.
Catalogic today named Ken Barth as its CEO to replace Walsh. Barth has been on the Catalogic board since the 2013 spinout. He was CEO of storage resource management vendor TekTools from 1996-2010 until SolarWinds acquired TekTools.
Webscale Networks is well aware that its e-commerce customers can’t tolerate much downtime.
To that end, the website infrastructure provider recently expanded capabilities to build a multi-cloud for disaster recovery as a service. Webscale Networks lets customers implement backup instances of their cloud deployments in separate regions or with separate cloud providers. The provider offers a service-level agreement (SLA) that guarantees customers will have their site running at an alternate location within 60 minutes, with no more than 15 minutes of data loss.
“Customers were interested in DR that was cross-cloud,” said Jay Smith, CTO and founder of Webscale.
Smith said Webscale’s SLA is conservative with the stated recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives, and sees them decreasing over time.
“We’re able to meet SLAs with room to spare,” Smith said.
Webscale Networks, based in Mountain View, Calif., began operations in 2012 under the name Lagrange Systems. It now claims over 40 customers, mainly mid-market e-commerce companies.
The Webscale Multi-Cloud DR service allows customers to fail over to another cloud provider, with minimal data loss and minimal outage time, said CEO Sonal Puri. In addition, if downtime occurs, Webscale can automatically fail over to a scheduled alternate region.
Webscale Multi-Cloud DR provides two options for disaster recovery — Webscale Cloud Backup and Webscale Cloud Mirror.
With Webscale Cloud Backup, customers can make a copy of their entire back end — the application and data server — periodically. For e-commerce applications that require more frequent backup, Webscale Cloud Mirror allows customers to keep a near real-time replica of their back end in an alternate location. Webscale Cloud Mirror also ensures that application delivery controllers remain consistently available regardless of the status of either the data server or application layer, according to the company.
Webscale Multi-Cloud DR, with Cloud Backup, is included with the Webscale Pro and Enterprise platforms. Webscale Multi-Cloud DR, with Cloud Mirror, is included in Webscale Enterprise or available as an additional service for Webscale Pro.
Puri said much of the Webscale Networks value lies in its back-end DR services across cloud providers and regions.
“We are unique because of the back end,” she said.
Veeam Software, which went from a niche virtual machine backup software vendor to an industry leader in less than a decade, changed its top leadership team Tuesday. The changes come as Veeam prepares to make a stronger run at enterprise sales and helping customers move to the cloud.
Ratmir Timashev stepped down as CEO and his co-founder Andrei Baronov shifted from VP of software engineering into the new CTO post. They will help Veeam with market strategy and product development. Veeam veteran William Largent was promoted to CEO and the vendor added VMware executive Peter McKay, who will run the vendor’s day-to-day operations as president and COO.
Veeam chief marketing officer Peter Ruchatz said the vendor had close to $500 million in billings last year and the transition is designed to help it reach its goal of $1 billion annual billings by 2019.
“We’re constantly thinking about how we can take the business to the next level,” he said. “We have a couple of things coming together now. Over the past 12 to 18 months, we’ve pursued opportunities beyond what Veeam’s business was in the beginning, which was the SMB market. Now we’re focused on availability for the enterprise.
“The changes we’ve made are starting to come to fruition and they will take Veeam to the next growth level. Those new opportunities also bring complexity, so we decided we should bring on external management.”
Largent joined Veeam in 2008 as executive vice president. He previously worked with Timashev and Baronov at Aelita Software, which Quest Software acquired in 2006. He has also been CEO of Applied Innovation. Largent will move from Veeam’s Columbus, Ohio office to its global headquarters in Baar, Switzerland.
McKay comes to Veeam from VMware, where he was senior vice president and general manager of the Americas. He was CEO of startups Desktone, Watchfire and eCredit – all acquired by larger companies – before joining VMware.
Ruchatz said McKay will run the day-to-day business. “He has experience in large corporations,” Ruchatz said. “He also knows how startups work. He knows how to scale and where we need to be.”
Ruchatz said Timashev will help plan Veeam’s strategic moves, and Baronov will remain involved in product direction.
Veeam has sold into the enterprise for the past year or so, but mostly to departments inside large companies. Ruchatz said the vendor is ramping up its sales team to go after larger footprints inside enterprises. It is planning an August product launch that expands its availability platform. Cloud connectivity will play a large role in the new product, which will include disaster recovery orchestration. Veeam is also expected add deeper integration with public clouds such as Amazon and Microsoft Azure. The changes will include more subscription-based pricing.
Veeam cracked the Gartner Magic Quadrant leaders category for data center backup and recovery software this year for the first time. Gartner listed Veeam as a leader along with Commvault, IBM, Veritas Technologies and EMC.
Veeam, a private company, claims its bookings revenue grew 24% year-over-year for the first quarter of 2016, including a 75% growth in deals above $500,000. Veeam claims an average of 3,500 new customers each month and said it finished March with 193,000 customers worldwide.
Newcomer McKay previously served as an executive-in-residence for Insight Venture Partners, which has a minority holding in Veeam. However, Ruchatz said Veeam has no plans to seek venture funding or become a public company.
“Nothing changes on the investment side,” Ruchatz said. “We enjoy being a private company and have the flexibility to make big moves. We’re running a profitable company and the market knows it. We don’t need further funding. In fact, we have a enough to start looking at making potential acquisitions.”