Storage Soup

May 22 2012   10:24AM GMT

Hitachi Data Systems, EMC divided about federation

Dave Raffo Dave Raffo Profile: Dave Raffo

EMC’s new Federated Tiered Storage (FTS) for VMAX arrays allows customers to run other EMC platforms or competing storage systems behind VMAX, much like Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) has virtualized arrays for years behind its Universal Storage Platform (USP) and current Virtual Storage Platform (VSP) systems.

Not surprisingly, EMC claims its virtualization features go beyond those of Hitachi’s, and HDS claims EMC is off base with those claims.

Brian Gallagher, EMC president of enterprise storage, made the case for EMC’s virtualization Monday during the opening of EMC World.

“We’ve extended Symmetrix’s data integrity to non-EMC devices. Hitachi does not do that,” Gallagher said. “Also, our technology is free of charge. You can virtualize any amount of non-EMC storage behind Symmetrix. Hitachi gives you a certain amount of terabytes for free, and then they charge when you go beyond that. Hitachi will also tell you not to use virtualization for databases, we don’t say that. We also extend FAST to other arrays. They [Hitachi] don’t extend auto tiering [to VSP].”

Claus Mikkelsen, chief scientist at HDS, disputed EMC’s points in an e-mail to Storage Soup. He said the HDS VSP supports “full inheritance” on externally virtualized storage devices from HDS or other vendors.

As for EMC’s free claim, Mikkelsen said “EMC states that software license enablement of FTS is a no-charge feature to customers, but fails to mention the future impact on software maintenance costs for the FTS license and any other EMC software license that charges maintenance based on installed capacity. With the Switch It On program from HDS, virtualization is free and third-party capacity is deeply discounted.”

Mikkelsen said HDS offers “prudent” advice on using virtualization with databases.

“We state that that Hitachi Dynamic Tiering on VSP will intelligently place data pages based on an application’s I/O access pattern,” he said. “Additionally, we recommend that customers do not immediately place OLTP database environments with high I/O transaction rates and low average response time requirements as externally virtualized storage. This is prudent advice that any intelligent storage vendor would recommend.”

Finally, Mikkelson said HDS’ technology does extend its Dynamic Tiering to third-party virtualized arrays.

EMC’s FTS will require time for users to kick the tires before it can be accurately judged, but the virtualization features are welcome additions.

“This is at least a step down the path to VSP-style virtualization,” said Ray Lucchesi, president of Silverton Consulting.

You can expect more steps – and more spats with HDS – before EMC’s array virtualization story is finished.

1  Comment on this Post

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when other members comment.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
  • Dumadum
    It is really nice to see EMC play catchup for a change on a technology feature they have ignored for so long and now trying to defend it by trying to portray that they have something new and unique. Another important factor is that it is not easy to build and complete an interoperability matrix for virtualization. HDS, IBM, NetApp all have a clear jump over here. Customers should be wary of putting their storage arrays behind the VMAX as it is still unproven and frankly EMC will have to build that expertise of testing from ground up. (I am sure they will claim otherwise!!!!). Also important for customers to note that this is not the only storage virtualization technology out there. In fact both EMC and HDS have the philosophy that "our boxes can also do virtualization". But the fact remains that the VSPz and the VMaxes can never ever treat third party storage as primary storage. There will be performance implications and functionality issues with the virtualized storage unlike architectures from IBM (SVC) and Netapp (V-series). This is the reason you will never find a public benchmark from HDS or EMC about storage virtualization........
    0 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to: