<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foundry delays vote on Brocade deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/foundry-delays-vote-on-brocade-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/foundry-delays-vote-on-brocade-deal/</link>
	<description>A SearchStorage.com blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brocade gets discount on Foundry &#8212; Storage Soup</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/storage-soup/foundry-delays-vote-on-brocade-deal/#comment-7310</link>
		<dc:creator>Brocade gets discount on Foundry &#8212; Storage Soup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/10/24/foundry-delays-vote-on-brocade-deal/#comment-7310</guid>
		<description>[...]  When Foundry Networks delayed its shareholders meeting last week to vote on the proposed Brocade deal, there was speculation that A) Brocade wanted to renegotiate the price, or B) it had problems raising $400 million in high-yield bonds to help finance the deal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  When Foundry Networks delayed its shareholders meeting last week to vote on the proposed Brocade deal, there was speculation that A) Brocade wanted to renegotiate the price, or B) it had problems raising $400 million in high-yield bonds to help finance the deal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->